|

NATCA In Washington
Hill Visit Report
Members
Forms
Photos
2007
Photos 2008
Issues
Facility Data Report
Videos
| | 57 162
106 th Congress
Report
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
1st Session
106 180
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND RELATED AGENCIES APPROPRIATIONS BILL,
2000
June 9, 1999.--Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the
State of the Union and ordered to be printed
Mr. Wolf, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following
REPORT
[To accompany H.R. 2084]
The Committee on Appropriations submits the following report in
explanation of the accompanying bill making appropriations for the
Department of Transportation and related agencies for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2000.
INDEX TO BILL AND REPORT
Page number
Bill
Report
Narrative summary of Committee action
2
Program, project, and activity
4
Title I--Department of Transportation:
Office of the Secretary
2
5
Coast Guard
6
19
Federal Aviation Administration
10
30
Federal Highway Administration
16
72
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
18
94
Federal Railroad Administration
21
102
Federal Transit Administration
23
114
Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation
32
179
Research and Special Programs Administration
33
180
Office of Inspector General
35
185
Surface Transportation Board
35
186
Title II--Related Agencies:
Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board
36
187
National Transportation Safety Board
36
188
Title III--General Provisions
37
189
House Report Requirements:
Appropriations not authorized by law
199
Changes in existing law
194
Comparison with budget resolution
200
Constitutional authority
191
Financial assistance to state and local governments
201
Five-year projections of outlays
200
Ramseyer
192
Transfers of funds
192
Tabular summary of the bill
202
SUMMARY AND MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BILL
The accompanying bill would provide $13,420,575,000 in new budget
(obligational) authority for the programs of the Department of
Transportation and related agencies, $60,245,000 less than the
$13,480,820,000 requested in the budget. In total, the bill includes
obligational authority (new budget authority, guaranteed obligations
contained in the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA21),
limitations on obligations, and exempt obligations) of $50,699,141,000.
This is $3,475,285,000 more than the comparable fiscal year 1999 enacted
level and $541,055,000 more than the budget request.
Selected major recommendations in the accompanying bill are:
(1) An appropriation of $8,298,000,000 for the Federal Aviation
Administration, an increase of $685,442,000 above the fiscal year 1999
level;
(2) A limitation of $2,250,000,000 for grants-in-aid for airports,
an increase of $300,000,000 above the fiscal year 1999 level and
$650,000,000 above the budget request;
(3) An appropriation of $2,791,000,000 for operating expenses of the
Coast Guard, including $521,000,000 for drug interdiction activities, a
forty percent increase over last year's level;
(4) An appropriation of $571,000,000 for grants to the National
Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), to cover capital expenses;
(5) A total of $60,602,000 for the office of the secretary,
$1,975,000 below the budget request;
(6) Highway program obligation limitations of $27,701,350,000,
consistent with provisions of TEA21, and $2,190,350,000 over fiscal year
1999;
(7) Transit program obligations of $5,797,000,000, consistent with
provisions of TEA21, and $824,000,000 over fiscal year 1999; and
(8) A total of $181,884,000 for motor carrier safety operations,
research, and grants, an increase of $22,109,000 above fiscal year 1999.
THE EFFECT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE
21ST CENTURY
Last year, over the objections of the House and Senate Committees on
Appropriations and the House and Senate Budget Committees, the
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA21) amended the
Budget Enforcement Act to provide two new additional spending categories
or ``firewalls'', the highway category and the mass transit category.
The highway category is comprised of all funding for federal-aid
highways, motor carrier safety programs, highway safety grants, and
highway safety research and development programs. The highway category
obligations are capped at $28,085,150,000 and outlays (adjusted) are
capped at $24,574,000,000 in fiscal year 2000. If appropriations action
forces highway obligations or outlays to exceed these levels, the
difference is charged against the non-defense discretionary spending
category. Likewise, the transit category is comprised of funding for
transit formula grants, transit capital projects, Federal Transit
Administration administrative expenses, transit planning and research
programs, and university transportation research. The mass transit
category obligations are capped at $5,797,000,000 and outlays are capped
at $4,117,000,000 in fiscal year 2000. Any additional appropriated
funding above the levels specified as guaranteed for each transit
program in TEA21 (that which could be appropriated from general funds
authorized under section 5338(h) of TEA21) is charged to the non-defense
discretionary category.
These ``firewalls'' make it virtually impossible for the
Appropriations Committee to make downward adjustments to those funding
levels in the annual appropriations process over the next four years.
This Committee argued that providing large increases for those programs,
and guaranteeing those amounts through firewall mechanisms and points of
order in the House, essentially created mandatory appropriations within
the discretionary caps, which would undermine Congressional flexibility
to fund other equally important programs. As a result, of the
$50,699,141,000 of budgetary resources provided in this bill, nearly 70
percent, is not controlled by annual appropriations Acts but is
predetermined by TEA21. The remaining $12,700,000,000 includes
appropriations and budgetary resources principally for the National
Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak), the U.S. Coast Guard, the
Federal Aviation Administration, the offices of the secretary, the
Research and Special Programs Administration, and a number of smaller
independent agencies. These appropriations are currently controlled by
annual appropriations action.
The Committee has worked hard in this new environment to produce a
balanced bill, which provides adequately for all modes of
transportation. The transportation subcommittee has been allocated an
8.5 percent increase ($3.5 billion) in outlays for the coming fiscal
year, while the non-defense discretionary budget as a whole is at a hard
freeze. Clearly, this increase will cause non-transportation programs
all across the government to be under more severe budget pressures, in
order to keep the overall budget in balance. However, the effect of the
firewalls also leaves its mark on those transportation programs and
activities not covered within the surface transportation
guarantees--most notably the Coast Guard and the Federal Aviation
Administration. Since the highway and transit guarantees consume
three-quarters of the increase provided to the Subcommittee, other
agencies in the bill must compete for leftover funding, which is
essentially at a hard freeze. The FAA and the Coast Guard together
requested an increase of almost $800,000,000 in fiscal year 2000
outlays. Although reasonable, this level of funding is simply not
possible because of the firewalls, resulting in a Committee bill
approximately $270,000,000 below the request for these safety-related
agencies. Since the Subcommittee is required to allocate the majority of
its increased resources to firewalled programs, these other agencies
will continue to feel the budgetary pressures.
The Committee has done the best it can considering the new firewalls.
However, the Committee is concerned that TEA21 continues to skew
transportation priorities inappropriately, by providing a banquet of
increases to highway and transit spending while leaving safety-related
agencies such as the Coast Guard and FAA to scramble for the remaining
crumbs. The Committee continues to believe that safety should remain the
Federal Government's highest responsibility in the transportation area.
Were it not for the firewalls, a portion of the generous 8.5 percent
increase could have been allocated to improvements in aviation or
maritime safety, and more could have been done to fight the menace of
illegal drug trafficking, while still providing significant increases in
highway and transit programs. The Committee has also been unable to
consider increases above the guaranteed levels for highways and transit
programs, because it would have required even further reductions in
critical FAA and Coast Guard programs.
TABULAR SUMMARY
A table summarizing the amounts provided for fiscal year 1999 and the
amounts recommended in the bill for fiscal year 2000 compared with the
budget estimates is included at the end of this report.
COMMITTEE HEARINGS
The Committee has conducted extensive hearings on the programs and
projects provided for in the Department of Transportation and Related
Agencies Appropriations Bill for fiscal year 2000. These hearings are
contained in seven published volumes. The Committee received testimony
from officials of the executive branch, Members of Congress, officials
of the General Accounting Office, officials of state and local
governments, and private citizens.
The bill recommendations for fiscal year 2000 have been developed
after careful consideration of all the information available to the
Committee.
PROGRAM, PROJECT, AND ACTIVITY
During fiscal year 2000, for the purposes of the Balanced Budget and
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99 177), as amended,
with respect to appropriations contained in the accompanying bill, the
terms ``program, project, and activity'' shall mean any item for which a
dollar amount is contained in an appropriations Act (including joint
resolutions providing continuing appropriations) or accompanying reports
of the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations, or accompanying
conference reports and joint explanatory statements of the committee of
conference. This definition shall apply to all programs for which new
budget (obligational) authority is provided, as well as to capital
investment grants, Federal Transit Administration. In addition, the
percentage reductions made pursuant to a sequestration order to funds
appropriated for facilities and equipment, Federal Aviation
Administration, and for acquisition, construction, and improvements,
Coast Guard, shall be applied equally to each ``budget item'' that is
listed under said accounts in the budget justifications submitted to the
House and Senate Committees on Appropriations as modified by subsequent
appropriations Acts and accompanying committee reports, conference
reports, or joint explanatory statements of the committee of conference.
SAFETY PROGRAMS
In this bill, the Committee has worked hard to protect funding for
essential safety-related programs of the Department of Transportation
and the independent agencies. This has been difficult, but not
impossible, given the budget constraints faced by the Federal Government
this year. In some cases, funds have been added to the administration's
request for safety-related activities. However, if, in the judgment of
departmental officials any of the Committee's recommendations would
significantly harm transportation safety, or if unanticipated safety
needs arise during the course of the appropriations process, the
Committee welcomes discussions with the administration to adjust
individual funding levels and provide the funding needed. The bill also
allows significant flexibility through the reprogramming process, which
requires no further legislative action. The Committee will work with
administration officials to reprogram funds for safety programs if that
should be required.
TITLE I
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
SALARIES AND EXPENSES
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999\1\ ($60,490,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\2\ 62,577,000
Recommended in the bill\1\ (60,602,000)
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +112,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 -1,975,000
\1\Total amount appropriated in separate accounts. Excludes $7,754,000 in Y2K emergency funding.
\2\Amount requested in this consolidated account.
The bill provides a total program level of $60,602,000 for the
salaries and expenses of the various offices comprising the Office of
the Secretary. The Committee has not approved the consolidated
appropriations request for the various offices within the office of the
secretary and has continued to provide appropriations for each office
within the office of the secretary. Specific program recommendations are
discussed in this report under the individual appropriations accounts.
Congressional justifications. --The Committee appreciates the timely
submission of the department's fiscal year 2000 congressional
justifications. The Committee again directs the department to submit all
of the department's fiscal year congressional justifications on the
first Monday in February, concurrent with the official submission of the
President's budget to Congress.
The department is also directed to submit its fiscal year 2001
congressional justification materials for the salaries and expenses of
the office of the secretary at the same level of detail provided in the
congressional justifications presented in fiscal year 2000.
Staffing levels. --The offices comprising the office of the
secretary are directed not to fill any positions in fiscal year 1999
that are currently vacant if such vacancies are proposed in this Act for
elimination in fiscal year 2000.
Assessments. --The Committee directs that assessments charged by the
office of the secretary to the modal administrations shall be for
administrative activities, not policy initiatives.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Limitation on political and Presidential appointees. --The Committee
has included a provision in the bill (sec. 305), similar to provisions
in past Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations
Acts, which limits the number of political and Presidential appointees
within the Department of Transportation. The ceiling for fiscal year
2000 is 100 personnel, which is the same level as enacted in fiscal year
1999. The bill specifies that no political or presidential appointee may
be detailed outside the Department of Transportation.
Transfer authority.-- The bill contains a general provision (sec.
331) that authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to transfer funds
appropriated to any office of the Office of the Secretary to any other
office of the Office of the Secretary, provided that no appropriation
shall be increased or decreased by more than 12 percent by all such
transfers. In addition, any transfer shall be submitted for approval to
the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations.
IMMEDIATE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $1,624,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (1,967,000)
Recommended in the bill 1,867,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +243,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 -100,000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Immediate Office of the Secretary has the primary responsibility
to provide overall planning, direction, and control of departmental
affairs. The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,867,000 for
expenses of the immediate office of the secretary, which represents an
increase of $243,000 above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level and
$100,000 below the level assumed in the budget request. The
recommendation assumes the elimination of the new counselor to the
secretary position (-$100,000).
Eliminate counselor to the secretary. --The Committee recommendation
assumes the elimination of the counselor to the secretary position, a
new position proposed in fiscal year 2000. The Committee believes that
current staffing levels in the immediate office of the secretary and the
resources provided in the bill are sufficient to enable the secretary to
carry out his legislative agenda, formulate national transportation
policy, and to promote and foster an intermodal transportation system,
economic growth and trade.
IMMEDIATE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY SECRETARY
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $585,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (612,000)
Recommended in the bill 612,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +27,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Immediate Office of the Deputy Secretary has the primary
responsibility to assist the Secretary in the overall planning,
direction and control of departmental affairs. The Committee recommends
an appropriation of $612,000 for expenses of the office of the deputy
secretary, which represents an increase of $27,000 above the fiscal year
1999 enacted level and the same level assumed in the budget request.
OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $8,750,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (9,150,000)
Recommended in the bill 9,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +250,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 -150,000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Office of the General Counsel provides legal services to the
Office of the Secretary and coordinates and reviews the legal work of
the chief counsels' offices of the operating administrations.
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $9,000,000 for expenses
of the office of general counsel, which represents an increase of
$250,000 above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level and $150,000 below the
level assumed in the budget request. The recommendation assumes the
elimination of 1 attorney advisor (-$150,000).
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR POLICY
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $2,808,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (2,924,000)
Recommended in the bill
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -2,808,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 -2,924,000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Committee recommendation deletes the appropriation for the office
of the assistant secretary for policy. Funding to support the activities
of this office are contained in an appropriation for a new office, the
office of the assistant secretary for transportation policy and
intermodalism, which is discussed later in this report.
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR AVIATION AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $7,650,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (7,732,000)
Recommended in the bill 7,632,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -18,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 -100,000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs is
responsible for administering economic regulatory functions regarding
the airline industry and provides departmental leadership and
coordination on international transportation policy issues relating to
maritime, trade, technical assistance and cooperative programs.
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $7,632,000 for expenses
of the office of the assistant secretary for aviation and international
affairs, which represents a reduction of $18,000 from the fiscal year
1999 enacted level, and $100,000 below the level assumed in the budget
request. The recommendation assumes the elimination of one international
transportation specialist. The bill includes a provision that permits
the collection and crediting to this appropriation of up to $1,250,000
in user fees, as requested in the budget.
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR BUDGET AND PROGRAMS
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $6,349,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (6,790,000)
Recommended in the bill 6,770,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +421,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 -20,000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Assistant Secretary for Budget and Programs is responsible for
developing, reviewing and presenting budget resource requirements for
the department to the Secretary, Congress and the Office of Management
and Budget.
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $6,770,000 for expenses
of the office of the assistant secretary for budget and programs, which
represents an increase of $421,000 above the fiscal year 1999 enacted
level, and $20,000 below the level assumed in the budget request. The
recommendation also disallows increases in reception and representation
costs (-$20,000).
Reception and representation costs .--The Committee has not provided
an increase of $20,000 for additional representation and reception
activities. This request has been rejected for the past several years.
In light of staffing reductions and budget constraints, approving
additional appropriations for reception and representation cannot be
justified.
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $1,941,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (2,039,000)
Recommended in the bill 2,039,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +98,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Governmental Affairs is
responsible for coordinating all Congressional, intergovernmental, and
consumer activities of the department.
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,039,000 for this
office, which represents an increase of $98,000 above the fiscal year
1999 enacted level, and the same as the level assumed in the budget
request.
The Committee directs the department to notify the House and Senate
Committees on Appropriations not less than three business days before
any discretionary grant award, letter of intent, or full funding grant
agreement in excess of $1,000,000 is announced by the department or its
modal administrations from: (1) any discretionary program of the Federal
Highway Administration other than the emergency relief program; (2) the
airport improvement program of the Federal Aviation Administration; and
(3) any program of the Federal Transit Administration other than the
formula grants and fixed guideway modernization programs. Such
notification shall include the date on which the official announcement
of the grant is to be made.
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR ADMINISTRATION
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $19,722,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (18,847,000)
Recommended in the bill 17,767,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -1,955,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 -1,080,000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration is
responsible for coordinating, overseeing and conducting various
accounting, procurement, personnel management, and ADP operations of the
department.
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $17,767,000 for expenses
of the office of the assistant secretary for administration, which
represents a reduction of $1,955,000 from the fiscal year 1999 enacted
level, and $1,080,000 below the level assumed in the budget request. The
recommendation assumes the following reductions:
Eliminate funding for human resource information system -$250,000
Eliminate 2 personnel management specialists -150,000
Eliminate 3 program analysts -180,000
General reduction due to budget constraints -500,000
Human resource information system (HRIS) .--The Committee
recommendation deletes funding for the human resource information system
and directs that none of the funds contained in this Act shall be
available for the implementation of the system. By the department's own
admission, HRIS is still in its very preliminary concept exploration
phase and a total cost estimate and schedule for delivery cannot be
developed until completion of certain decision points, which are not
expected until the middle of fiscal year 2000. Any further funding for
this activity is premature and unjustified at this time.
Personnel reductions .--The Committee recommendation deletes funding
requested for several positions, including two personnel management
specialists and three program analysts. These positions are currently
vacant.
General reduction .--Due to budget constraints, the Committee
recommendation reduces the budget request for the office of
administration by $500,000. The Committee directs that such reductions
be taken from non-personnel activities, such as contractor support,
overhead and other related activities, to avoid personnel reductions not
otherwise directed by the Committee.
OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $1,565,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (1,836,000)
Recommended in the bill 1,836,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +271,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Office of Public Affairs is responsible for news releases,
articles, fact sheets, briefing materials, publications, and
audio-visual materials of the department.
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,836,000 for expenses
of the office of public affairs, which represents an increase of
$271,000 over the fiscal year 1999 enacted level, and the same level
assumed in the budget request.
EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $1,047,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (1,102,000)
Recommended in the bill 1,102,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +55,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Executive Secretariat assists the Secretary and Deputy Secretary
in carrying out their management functions and responsibilities by
controlling and coordinating internal and external written materials.
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,102,000 for expenses
of the office of the executive secretariat, which represents an increase
of $55,000 over the fiscal year 1999 enacted level, and the same level
as assumed in the budget request.
BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $561,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (520,000)
Recommended in the bill 520,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -41,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Board of Contract Appeals provides an independent forum for
considering all contract-related claims by or against a contractor
involving any element of the department.
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $520,000 for expenses of
the board of contract appeals, which represents a decrease of $41,000
from the fiscal year 1999 enacted level, and the same level assumed in
the budget request.
OFFICE OF SMALL AND DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS UTILIZATION
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $1,020,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (1,222,000)
Recommended in the bill 1,222,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +202,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization is
responsible for promoting small and disadvantaged business participation
in the department's procurement and grants programs. The Committee
recommends an appropriation of $1,222,000 for expenses of the office of
small and disadvantaged business utilization, which represents an
increase of $202,000 over the fiscal year 1999 enacted level, and the
same level assumed in the budget request.
The Committee understands that there are many qualified, willing and
able minority-owned businesses, women-owned businesses, and small
businesses that design and place advertising and advertising campaigns,
which can assist the department in its efforts to better target ethnic
and general audiences in the print, electronic, and radio media. The
Committee urges the department to utilize those qualified
minority-owned, women-owned, and small businesses in the initiation,
design and placement of its advertising in the print, radio, and
electronic media.
OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $1,036,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (1,574,000)
Recommended in the bill 1,454,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +418,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 -120,000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Office of Intelligence and Security was created during fiscal
year 1990 to address transportation intelligence and security issues.
The primary purposes of the office are to provide intelligence and
security oversight of the operating administrations to increase the
safety and security of the traveling public, and to provide the
Secretary and Deputy Secretary with current intelligence and security
information, with special emphasis on potential or actual terrorist
threats to transportation interests.
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $1,454,000 for expenses
of the office of intelligence and security, which represents an increase
of $418,000 over the fiscal year 1999 enacted level, and a decrease of
$120,000 from the levels assumed in the budget request. The
recommendation disallows funding for CIA support reimbursement
(-$120,000).
CIA support reimbursement. --The Committee recommendation deletes
funds requested to reimburse the Department of Defense for a full-time
liaison with elements of the intelligence community. The Committee
expects that such support currently provided in fiscal year 1999 by the
Department of Defense shall continue into fiscal year 2000.
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $4,875,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (5,075,000)
Recommended in the bill 5,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +125,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 -75,000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Office of the Chief Information Officer serves as the principle
advisor to the Secretary on matters involving information resources and
information systems management, including responsibility over the
Federal Aviation Administration's Year 2000 compliance efforts.
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $5,000,000 for expenses
of the office of the chief information officer, which represents an
increase of $125,000 over the fiscal year 1999 enacted level, and
$75,000 below the level assumed in the budget request. The
recommendation assumes a staffing level of 20 full time equivalent
positions. The recommendation includes $50,000 for information systems
security activities. These funds are also supplemented by funds provided
to the department's modal administrations for similar activities.
OFFICE OF INTERMODALISM
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $957,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (1,187,000)
Recommended in the bill
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -957,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 -1,187,000
\1\Requested in the consolidated salaries and expenses account.
The Committee recommendation deletes the appropriation for the office
of intermodalism. Funding to support the activities of this office are
contained in an appropriation for a new office, the office of the
assistant secretary for transportation policy and intermodalism, which
is discussed later in this report.
OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR TRANSPORTATION POLICY AND
INTERMODALISM
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999
Budget request, fiscal year 2000
Recommended in the bill $3,781,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +3,781,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 +3,781,000
The Committee recommends $3,781,000 for the office of the assistant
secretary of transportation policy and intermodalism. This office is to
encompass the activities previously performed by the office of the
assistant secretary for policy and the office of intermodalism. The
office shall be the chief domestic policy office for the department and
shall be responsible for analysis, development, communication and review
of policy and plans for domestic transportation issues, including
intermodal initiatives involving the department's multiple operating
administrations.
To satisfy the requirement of Title V of the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, the Committee directs that there
be established within the office of the assistant secretary for
transportation policy and intermodalism an office of intermodalism, of
which the assistant secretary for transportation policy and
intermodalism shall serve as the director. The recommendation assumes
the following reductions from the budget requests for the office of the
assistant secretary of policy and the office of intermodalism:
Eliminate associate deputy secretary and director, office of intermodalism position -$150,000
Reduce funds for website development -80,000
Delete funds for radio navigation staff position -50,000
Delete funds for transportation industry analyst -50,000
Intermodal trade. --The Committee recognizes that intermodal trade
is increasingly dependent on air freight. As reliance on air cargo
continues to grow in the years ahead, the impact of this burgeoning
trade on the aviation system will increase as well. While significant
resources have been expended to improve the connectivity of the truck
and rail modes of freight movement, little attention has been paid to
the growing need for better intermodal connections between air and
surface modes of freight transportation. The Committee encourages the
department to examine what steps should be undertaken to facilitate the
seamless movement of goods between the air and surface modes: including
infrastructure improvements at freight and reliever airports, that would
improve connectivity among rail, truck, and air freight; reduce
congestion at the borders and other international ports of entry; and
facilitate the development of inland ports. These recommendations should
support ongoing efforts by the Department of the Treasury to develop the
automated commercial environment and international trade processing
centers.
OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $6,966,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 7,742,000
Recommended in the bill 7,742,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +776,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $7,742,000 for expenses
of the office of civil rights, which represents an increase of $776,000
above fiscal year 1999 enacted level and the same level as the budget
request.
The Office of Civil Rights is responsible for advising the Secretary
on civil rights and equal opportunity matters and ensuring full
implementation of civil rights opportunity precepts in all of the
department's official actions and programs. This office is responsible
for enforcing laws and regulations that prohibit discrimination in
federally operated and federally assisted transportation programs. This
office also handles all civil rights cases related to Department of
Transportation employees.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, RESEARCH, AND DEVELOPMENT
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $9,000,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 6,275,000
Recommended in the bill 2,950,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -6,050,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 -3,325,000
This appropriation finances those research activities and studies
concerned with planning, analysis, and information development needed to
support the Secretary's responsibilities in the formulation of national
transportation policies. The overall program is carried out primarily
through contracts with other federal agencies, educational institutions,
nonprofit research organizations, and private firms.
The Committee recommends $2,950,000 for this appropriation, which
represents a decrease of $6,030,000 below the fiscal year 1999 enacted
level and $3,325,000 below the budget request. The following table
summarizes the Committee's recommendation for activities funded within
this account:
Transportation policy and planning:
Environmental, energy and safety policy $100,000
Transportation economic policy 164,000
Radionavigation and positioning 920,000
Aviation and international policy 200,000
Salaries and administrative costs:
Personnel compensation and benefits 1,216,000
Other administrative costs 97,000
TASC 153,000
Systems development 100,000
Total, transportation, planning, research, and development 2,950,000
The Committee recommendation deletes funding for several new
non-critical studies and initiatives, including funding for (1) the
center on environmental analysis and forecasting; (2) an interagency
personnel agreement for an engineer on the radio navigation and position
staff; (3) modernization of aviation data systems; and (4) a freight
tagging technology study. Funding of $750,000 is provided for hazard,
threat and detection monitoring and shall be available to supplement
funding provided elsewhere in the office of the secretary and the
department's operating administrations for similar activities. Funding
of $100,000 is provided for continuation activities of the electronic
grants project, but funding is deferred for new automated rulemaking
activities due to budget constraints. In addition, $100,000 is included
within the funds provided for transportation economic policy studies to
conduct a study of telecommuting (teleWork), clean air, and energy
conservation in transportation policy, in conjunction with
representatives from the high-technology business community, state and
local governments, and relevant federal agencies.
TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICE CENTER
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 1 ($124,124,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 2 (229,953,000)
Recommended in the bill 3 (157,965,000)
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 (+33,841,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 (-71,988,000)
1In fiscal year 1999, the limitation on transportation administrative service center expenses was reduced by $15,000,000.
2Proposed without limitation. Amount reflected is the estimated program level for fiscal year 2000.
3In fiscal year 2000, the limitation on transportation administrative service center expenses is also reduced in a general provision (-$10,000,000).
The transportation administrative service center was created in
fiscal year 1997 to provide common administrative services to the
various modes and outside entities that desire those services for
economy and efficiency. The fund is financed through negotiated
agreements with the department's operating administrations and other
governmental elements requiring the center's capabilities.
The Committee agreed to create the transportation administrative
service center in fiscal year 1997 at the department's request. In
agreeing to that request, the Committee limited (1) the activities that
can be transferred to the transportation administrative service center
to only those approved by the agency administrator, and (2) special
assessments or reimbursable agreements levied against any program,
project or activity funded in this Act to only those assessments or
reimbursable agreements and the basis for them are presented to and
approved by the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations. These
limitations are continued in fiscal year 2000.
The Committee recommends a limitation of $157,965,000, an increase of
$33,841,000 above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level and $71,988,000
below the request. The recommended reductions from the budget request
reflect the following adjustments:
Eliminate the transportation computer center -$15,600,000
Disallow transfer of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Office of Aeronautical Charting and Cartography to the TASC -55,055,000
Disallow request for additional staffing increases -1,333,000
Transportation computer center. --Last year in the House-reported
fiscal year 1999 Department of Transportation and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act, the House proposed to eliminate the transportation
computer center. The Committee based its recommendation on an Inspector
General (IG) report that found that several services offered by the
transportation administrative service center raised substantive cost
effectiveness issues. Based upon an evaluation by a DOT consultant and
its own audit, the IG concluded that the ``justification for continued
operation of the computer center is in doubt.'' The House agreed at that
time and proposed to eliminate the transportation computer center in
fiscal year 1999.
In the conference agreement accompanying the fiscal year 1999
Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act,
the conferees restored funding for the transportation computer center,
noting that the IG's findings may have been based on an out-dated
analysis. At that time, the conferees directed the IG to review again
the transportation computer center's cost effectiveness, utility and
value added to the department. That new audit showed that the center is
not competitive in the market place and that current rates for data
processing and storage are approximately two and six times higher,
respectively, than those quoted by another Government center providing
comparable data processing and storage services. Moreover, the center
was 31 percent less efficient than the average industry data processing
center when compared to benchmarking data for 168 Government and
commercial centers. Another February 1999 independent assessment of the
center showed that its fiscal year 1998 costs were approximately 11
percent higher than comparable Government computer centers, and 15
percent higher than comparable industry computer centers. Finally, the
IG audit recommended to the deputy secretary that the computer center
discontinue offering its current services within two years.
Consistent with the IG's report, the Committee's recommendation
eliminates the transportation computer center in fiscal year 2000 within
the transportation administrative service center and permits the
operating administrations to procure similar services from other
governmental or private providers.
Disallow transfer of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration's Office of Aeronautical Charting and Cartography to the
TASC. --The budget proposed that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration's Office of Aeronautical Charting and Cartography (AC&C)
be transferred from the Department of Commerce and placed within the
TASC. While the department believes that the AC&C product offerings are
closely aligned with the services provided by TASC, the Committee
asserts that the aeronautical charting services ultimately support
aviation safety missions within the FAA, and it is more logical that
these services be performed within the FAA. The Committee recommendation
includes funding for this activity within the FAA's appropriation for
fiscal year 2000. Accordingly, the TASC obligation limitation has been
reduced by $55,055,000 and staff reduced by 378 FTEs.
General provision. --The Committee has included a general provision
(sec. 318) which provides that amounts budgeted for the transportation
administrative service center in this bill are reduced, on a pro-rata,
basis to a limitation of $147,965,000. The Committee believes that this
reduction is justified given the significant personnel reductions that
have occurred within the department over the past several years. Common
administrative expenses like copying, supplies, computer services, motor
pool, parking and transit benefits, and telecommunications services
should be declining and can be accommodated within the levels provided
in this Act. Moreover, the Committee's recommendation for the program
operating level of the transportation administrative service center in
fiscal year 2000 represents an increase of over 35 percent compared to
the fiscal year 1999 enacted level, well in excess of the rate of
inflation for non-personnel activities.
The Committee remains concerned that previous reductions in
obligation authority have not been reflected in reduced billings to the
modal administrations. As such, over the past several years, TASC
charges have not been reduced to correspond to Congressional reductions
and each year the modal administrations have had to absorb sizable
shortfalls in TASC funding.
Last year the Committee directed the administrator of the TASC to
develop a mechanism to ensure that the budget approved for the TASC in
the accompanying Act corresponded to the appropriations provided for the
modes in the Act. The Committee is unaware of such a mechanism and
therefore directs the director of the transportation administrative
service center to submit to the House and Senate Committees on
Appropriations a plan to ensure that Congressionally-imposed reductions
in obligation authority are reflected in reduced billings to the modes
by December 1, 1999. In allocating the reductions recommended in this
Act for the TASC, the administrator of the TASC shall not reduce funding
provided to the modes for the transportation service center as these
services are to be acquired from other sources in fiscal year 2000.
PAYMENTS TO AIR CARRIERS
(airport and airway trust fund)
The essential air service program was originally created by the
Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 as a temporary measure to continue air
service to communities that had received federally mandated air service
prior to deregulation. The program currently provides subsidies to air
carriers serving small communities that meet certain criteria.
Subsidies, ranging from $5 to $320, currently support air service to 82
communities and serve about 700,000 passengers annually. This program
was established to provide a smooth phaseout of federal subsidies to
airlines that serve small airports.
The Federal Aviation Reauthorization Act of 1996 (Public Law 104 264)
authorized the collection of user fees for services provided by the
Federal Aviation Administration to aircraft that neither take off from,
nor land in the United States, commonly known as overflight fees. In
addition, the Act permanently appropriated these fees for authorized
expenses of the FAA.
Consistent with the FAA reauthorization legislation enacted in 1996,
this program became a mandatory program in fiscal year 1998.
General provision. --Over the years, Congress and the department
have worked to streamline the essential air service program and to
increase its efficiency by eliminating communities that are within an
easy drive of a major hub airport or where the costs clearly outweigh
the benefits. The bill includes a limitation (sec. 327), as requested by
the administration, that continues the existing eligibility standards
and will help preserve those efficiencies. Specifically, this limitation
continues appropriations language that limits the number of communities
that receive essential air service funding by excluding points in the 48
contiguous United States that are located fewer than seventy highway
miles from the nearest large or medium hub airport, or that require a
subsidy in excess of $200 per passenger, unless such point is more than
210 miles from the nearest large or medium airport.
MINORITY BUSINESS RESOURCE CENTER PROGRAM
Appropriation Limitation on direct loans
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $1,900,000 $13,775,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 1,900,000 13,775,000
Recommended in the bill 1,900,000 13,775,000
xlBill compared to:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999
Budget request, fiscal year 2000
The minority business resource center of the office of small and
disadvantaged business utilization provides assistance in obtaining
short-term working capital and bonding for disadvantaged, minority, and
women-owned businesses. The program enables qualified businesses to
obtain loans at prime interest rates for transportation-related
projects.
Prior to fiscal year 1993, loans under this program were funded by
the office of small and disadvantaged business utilization without a
limitation. Reflecting the changes made by the Credit Reform Act of
1990, beginning in fiscal year 1993, a separate appropriation is
provided only for the subsidy inherently assumed in those loans and the
cost to administer the loan program.
The recommendation fully funds the budget request, which provides a
limitation on direct loans of $13,775,000 and subsidy and administrative
costs totaling $1,900,000.
MINORITY BUSINESS OUTREACH
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $2,900,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 2,900,000
Recommended in the bill 2,900,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999
Budget request, fiscal year 2000
This appropriation provides contractual support to assist minority
business firms, entrepreneurs, and venture groups in securing contracts
and subcontracts arising out of projects that involve Federal spending.
It also provides grants and contract assistance that serves DOT-wide
goals and not just OST purposes. The Committee has provided $2,900,000,
the same level as provided in fiscal year 1999 and included in the
budget request.
COAST GUARD
SUMMARY OF FISCAL YEAR 2000 PROGRAM
The Coast Guard, as it is known today, was established on January 28,
1915, through the merger of the Revenue Cutter Service and the
Lifesaving Service. This was followed by transfers to the Coast Guard of
the United States Lighthouse Service in 1939 and the Bureau of Marine
Inspection and Navigation in 1942. The Coast Guard has as its primary
responsibilities enforcing all applicable federal laws on the high seas
and waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States; promoting
safety of life and property at sea; aiding navigation; protecting the
marine environment; and maintaining a state of readiness to function as
a specialized service of the Navy in time of war.
Including funds for national security activities and retired pay
accounts, the Committee recommends a total program level of
$4,048,039,000 for activities of the Coast Guard in fiscal year 2000.
This is $152,574,000 above the fiscal year 1999 program level.
The following table summarizes the fiscal year 1999 program levels,
the fiscal year 2000 program requests, and the Committee's
recommendations:
Program Fiscal year-- Committee recommended
1999 enacted 2000 estimate
Operating expenses 1 $3,048,073,000 $2,941,039,000 $2,791,000,000
Acquisition, construction and improvements 2 625,465,000 350,326,000 410,000,000
Environmental compliance and restoration 21,000,000 19,500,000 18,000,000
Alteration of bridges 14,000,000 15,000,000
Retired pay 684,000,000 721,000,000 721,000,000
Reserve training 3 74,000,000 72,000,000 72,000,000
Research, development, test and evaluation 4 17,000,000 21,709,000 21,039,000
---------------- ---------------- ----------------
Total 4,483,538,000 4,125,574,000 $4,048,039,000
1Fiscal year 1999 amount includes $2,400,000,000 in the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 and scored against budget function 400 (transportation); $300,000,000 in the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 and scored against budget function 050 (national security); $100,000,000 in emergency supplemental appropriations for readiness activities in title I of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1999; $16,300,000 in emergency supplemental appropriations for counter-drug activities in title IV of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1999; $31,773,000 in supplemental emergency appropriations distributed by the Office of Management and Budget to address Year 2000 date change compliance and provided in the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1999; and $200,000,000 in operations and maintenance funds provided in the 1999 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act. Fiscal year 2000 estimate includes $334,000,000 scored against budget function 050. Fiscal year 2000 recommended amount includes $300,000,000 scored against budget function 050.
2Fiscal year 1999 amount includes $230,000,000 in the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1999 for counter-drug assets.
3Fiscal year 1999 amount includes $5,000,000 in the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1999 for counter-drug activities.
4Fiscal year 1999 amount includes $5,000,000 in the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1999.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 1 $ 3,048,073,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 2 2,941,039,000
Recommended in the bill 3 2,791,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -257,073,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 -150,039,000
1Includes $300,000,000 in funds for national security activities scored in budget function 050; $300,000,000 in emergency funding for readiness requirements; $16,300,000 in emergency funding for drug interdiction activities; and $31,773,000 in emergency funding for Year 2000 date change compliance activities.
2Includes $334,000,000 in funds for national security activities scored in budget function 050.
3Includes $300,000,000 for national security activities scored in budget function 050.
Including $300,000,000 for national security activities, the
Committee recommends a total of $2,791,000,000 for operating activities
of the Coast Guard in fiscal year 2000, a decrease of $257,073,000 below
the fiscal year 1999 appropriation and $150,039,000 below the budget
request. The reduced amount is possible without harming Coast Guard
readiness due to $200,000,000 in supplemental funding provided for
fiscal year 1999 which will be available for obligation into fiscal year
2000. The following table compares the fiscal year 1999 enacted level,
the fiscal year 2000 estimate, and the recommended level by program,
project and activity:
[In thousands of dollars]
Program, project and activity Fiscal year--
1999 enacted 2000 estimate Recommended in the bill
I. Personnel Resources $1,757,945 $1,879,381 $1,879,381
II. Operating Funds and Unit Level Maintenance 623,149 655,472 655,472
C. District commands:
1. 1st district (Boston) 40,401 40,429 40,429
2. 7th district (Miami) 44,555 45,454 45,454
3. 8th district (New Orleans) 28,020 28,483 28,483
4. 9th district (Cleveland) 17,580 17,418 17,418
5. 13th district (Seattle) 13,165 13,721 13,721
6. 14th district (Honolulu) 8,435 7,332 7,332
7. 17th district (Juneau) 20,402 20,174 20,174
III. Depot-Level Maintenance 390,611 406,186 406,186
IV. Account-Wide Adjustments --- --- -150,039
Total base appropriation 2,771,705 2,941,039 2,791,000
Military readiness supplemental 28,295 --- ---
Military readiness supplemental 200,000 --- ---
Drug interdiction supplemental 16,300 --- ---
Y2K supplemental funding 31,773 --- ---
--------------- ---------------- --------------------------
Total appropriations 3,048,073 2,941,039 2,791,000
In Public Law 106 31, the Coast Guard received an additional
$200,000,000 in supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 1999, the
majority of which will be carried forward and made available by the
service to offset fiscal year 2000 budget requirements such as the
military pay raise, pay parity, and readiness initiatives. The change to
the budget estimate is recommended as a general reduction, to provide
the service maximum operational flexibility in blending these funds with
those provided in previous Acts.
Drug interdiction funding. --The bill provides $521,000,000, as
requested, for drug interdiction activities. This is an increase of
$148,800,000 (40 percent) over the estimated expenses for fiscal year
1999.
Ballast water management program. --Of the funds provided,
$4,000,000 is only to continue and broaden the national ballast water
management program. The current program allows Coast Guard boarding
officers to monitor industry compliance with voluntary guidelines
regarding the management of ballast water. The inadequate attention to
proper ballast water handling procedures leads to the propagation of
invasive aquatic species.
Air facilities. --Of the funds provided, $3,133,000 is only to
continue operations of the air facilities in Long Island, New York and
Muskegon, Michigan, and $5,505,000 is only for operations of a new air
facility to support Southern Lake Michigan. In fiscal year 1999,
Congress directed the Coast Guard to establish an additional search and
rescue facility on Southern Lake Michigan and to conduct a study
recommending the optimal site for this new station. The Committee
understands that the Coast Guard's analysis will recommend Waukegan,
Illinois as the preferred site, and funds are provided based on this
assumption.
Commercial fishing vessel safety program. --Of the funds provided,
$1,500,000 is only to support an expanded commercial fishing vessel
safety program.
St. Clair Shores Coast Guard Station, Michigan. --Of the funds
provided in this bill, $100,000 is only for acquisition of rescue
equipment, including airboats if determined to be necessary, at the St.
Clair Shores Coast Guard Station in Michigan.
BILL LANGUAGE
Defense-related activities. --The bill specifies that $300,000,000
of the total amount provided is for defense-related activities, the same
as enacted for fiscal year 1999, and $34,000,000 below the budget
estimate.
Executive order 12839. --The bill specifies that the Commandant
shall reduce both military and civilian employment for the purpose of
complying with executive order 12839. This provision has been included
in the bill for several years without change.
User fees. --The Committee continues the provision, first enacted in
fiscal year 1999, precluding the Coast Guard from using funds to plan,
finalize, or implement any new user fees unless legislation signed into
law after the date of enactment of this Act specifically authorizes
them.
GENERAL PROVISION
Vessel traffic safety fairway, Santa Barbara/San Francisco. --The
bill continues as a general provision (sec. 312) language that would
prohibit funds to plan, finalize, or implement regulations that would
establish a vessel traffic safety fairway less than five miles wide
between the Santa Barbara traffic separation scheme and the San
Francisco traffic separation scheme. On April 27, 1989, the department
published a notice of proposed rulemaking that would narrow the
originally proposed five-mile-wide fairway to two one-mile-wide fairways
separated by a two-mile-wide area where offshore oil rigs could be built
if Lease Sale 119 goes forward. Under this revised proposal, vessels
would be routed in close proximity to oil rigs because the two-mile-wide
non-fairway corridor could contain drilling rigs at the edge of the
fairways. The Committee is concerned that this rule, if implemented,
could increase the threat of offshore oil accidents off the California
coast. Accordingly, the bill continues the language prohibiting the
implementation of this regulation.
ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, AND IMPROVEMENTS
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999\1\ $625,465,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 350,326,000
Recommended in the bill 410,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -215,465,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 +59,674,000
\1\Includes $395,465,000 in the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 and $230,000,000 in other titles of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1999.
The bill includes $410,000,000 for the capital acquisition,
construction, and improvement programs of the Coast Guard for vessels,
aircraft, other equipment, shore facilities, and related administrative
expenses, of which $25,000,000 is to be derived from the oil spill
liability trust fund.
Consistent with past practice, the bill also includes language
distributing the total appropriation by budget activity and providing
separate obligation availabilities appropriate for the type of activity
being performed. The Committee continues to believe that these
obligation availabilities provide fiscal discipline and reduce long-term
unobligated balances.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The following table compares the fiscal year 1999 enacted level, the
fiscal year 2000 estimate, and the recommended level by program, project
and activity:
Program name Fiscal year-- Change from estimate
1999 enacted 2000 estimate 2000 House
Vessels $338,823,000 $165,760,000 $205,560,000 $39,800,000
Aircraft 134,200,000 22,110,000 38,310,000 +16,200,000
Other Equipment 36,569,000 53,726,000 59,400,000 +5,674,000
Shore Facilities and Aids to Navigation 67,423,000 55,800,000 55,800,000 ---
Personnel and Related Support 48,450,000 52,930,000 50,930,000 -2,000,000
--------------- --------------- --------------- -------------
Total appropriation 625,465,000 350,326,000 410,000,000 59,674,000
VESSELS
The Committee recommends $205,560,000 for vessels, a reduction of
$133,263,000 below the amount provided for fiscal year 1999 and
$39,800,000 above the administration's request. Specific adjustments to
the budget estimate are explained below.
Seagoing buoy tender replacement. --The Committee recommendation
provides $108,000,000 for the seagoing buoy tender (WLB) replacement
program, an increase of $35,400,000 above the fiscal year 1999 enacted
level and $31,000,000 above the budget estimate. The Committee bill
provides funding for acquisition of three WLBs compared to two in the
budget estimate. The Coast Guard advises the Committee that the
additional funding can be obligated in fiscal year 2000. The Committee
believes this program should proceed at a faster pace given the age of
the current vessels.
Mackinaw replacement. --The Committee recommendation provides
$13,000,000 for further design and acquisition of a replacement vessel
for the cutter Mackinaw, which performs icebreaking missions on the
Great Lakes. Funding of $5,300,000 was provided for this program in
fiscal year 1999. No funding was requested in fiscal year 2000.
A general provision has been included (sec. 345) which specifies that
$10,000,000 of this funding is to support a portion of the acquisition
cost, and is available for obligation until September 30, 2005.
Deepwater capability concept exploration. --The Committee recommends
$40,000,000, an increase of 100 percent above the $20,000,000
appropriated in fiscal year 1999. The budget estimate requested
$44,200,000 for this project. The Committee believes this 9.5 percent
reduction to the request will not cause harm to the deepwater program,
given its early stage of development.
AIRCRAFT
The Committee recommends $38,310,000 for aircraft, a reduction of
$95,890,000 below the amount provided for fiscal year 1999 and
$16,200,000 above the administration's request. Specific adjustments to
the budget estimate are explained below.
HH 65 conversion, Air Facility Southern Lake Michigan. --The
Committee recommends $8,000,000 for establishment of a seasonal air
facility to serve Southern Lake Michigan, pursuant to direction provided
in last year's appropriations conference report. The Coast Guard has
recently determined that this facility is most cost-effectively sited at
Waukegan, Illinois, and that approximately $8,000,000 in capital funding
is required in fiscal year 2000. The House has authorized $8,100,000 for
this project. The majority of these funds will be used to repair and
rebuild two existing HH 65 helicopters and to construct an additional
hanger facility to house these assets.
C 130H oil debris detection and burnoff technology. --The Committee
bill includes $1,200,000 for oil debris detection and burnoff
technology. This project is expected to improve HC 130H aircrew and
aircraft safety by automatically monitoring the aircraft's reduction
gearbox assemblies for impending failure. The system provides early
in-flight warning of excessive wear and tear in the gearbox, allowing
the crew to take action to prevent catastrophic failure, which could
otherwise result in loss of life or airframe.
HU 25 re-engining. --In fiscal year 1999, the Coast Guard identified
as a high priority for additional counter-drug funding the re-engining
of their existing HU 25 (``Falcon'') jet aircraft. The service used
$15,000,000 of the counter-drug funding for this purpose in fiscal year
1999, and has identified $25,000,000 in fiscal year 2001 and $15,000,000
in 2002 to complete the project. Congress intended that the fiscal year
1999 counter-drug funding be focused on activities which could provide a
near-term impact in the war on drugs. The Coast Guard's proposed one
year gap in a project the agency requested funding for, and has already
initiated, seems to undermine that goal. The Committee believes it makes
little sense to begin a program in one year, discontinue it in the next,
then initiate it again. For this reason, $7,000,000 is provided to fill
the gap in funding for this program.
OTHER EQUIPMENT
The Committee recommends $59,400,000 for other equipment, an increase
of $22,831,000 above the amount provided for fiscal year 1999 and
$5,674,000 above the administration's request. Specific adjustments to
the budget estimate are explained below.
Marine information for safety and law enforcement (MISLE).-- The
Committee recommends $10,274,000, a reduction of $226,000 below the
budget estimate. The reduction is due to budget constraints and the need
to fund higher priority initiatives.
National distress system modernization. --The Committee recommends
$18,000,000, an increase of $2,000,000 above the budget estimate. The
Committee believes this is an urgently-needed upgrade. The additional
funding is to accelerate the project.
Human resources information system. --The Committee recommendation
defers the $1,100,000 requested for this project. This is a
department-wide initiative which does not appear to be justified at the
present time. A more detailed discussion is found in this report under
Office of the Secretary, ``Office of the assistant secretary for
administration''.
Loran-C upgrade. --The Committee recommends $6,000,000 for continued
upgrade of the Loran-C navigation system. Although originally scheduled
for decommissioning, due to delays in development of satellite
navigation capability in the FAA, the most recent Loran-C schedule
maintains its operational use for many more years. Upgrades of the
system are necessary to maintain its effectiveness. The President's
budget requested $1,000,000 for this effort, which is too little to be
of meaningful use.
SHORE FACILITIES AND AIDS TO NAVIGATION
The Committee recommends $55,800,000 for shore facilities and aids to
navigation, a decrease of $11,623,000 below the amount provided for
fiscal year 1999 and the same as the administration's request.
PERSONNEL AND RELATED SUPPORT
The Committee recommends $50,930,000 for personnel and related
support, an increase of $2,480,000 (5.1 percent) above the amount
provided for fiscal year 1999 and $2,000,000 below the administration's
request.
Semiannual acquisition reports. --The Coast Guard is directed to
continue submission of semiannual acquisition reports to the House and
Senate Committees on Appropriations. The Coast Guard is to continue
including with each such report an up-to-date listing of unobligated
balances by acquisition project and by fiscal year, a Congressional
direction first implemented in fiscal year 1996. In 1998, the reporting
requirement was adjusted from quarterly to semiannually to reduce
paperwork requirements on the agency.
Bill Language
Capital investment plan. --The Committee was disturbed this year to
receive testimony from the General Accounting Office and the Coast Guard
concerning outyear capital requirements which appear to be far in excess
of the funding expected to be available. At the same time, the Coast
Guard has not developed a long-range capital plan which sets priorities
among those competing requirements and is restrained to the likely or
historic level of funding. Given the Coast Guard's statements of an
impending tidal wave of capital requirements and the advanced age of
most of its ships and aircraft, it seems irresponsible for the service
to continue to operate from a one-year plan. Likewise, Congress needs to
see how all the pieces fit together in the Coast Guard's budget
requests, and how they tie to future year funding requirements. The
Committee believes the Coast Guard must have a credible, funding
constrained, multiyear capital plan, and that this should be updated
each year with submission of the President's budget. Therefore, the bill
includes language requiring the Coast Guard to develop and submit to the
Congressional appropriations and authorization committees a five-year
capital investment plan which is constrained to the outyear funding
levels provided by the Office of Management and Budget. The Committee
intends to carry this language each year if necessary, requiring annual
submission of an updated plan with the President's budget request.
Similar language has been included for the Federal Aviation
Administration, which also lacks such a plan.
Disposal of real property. --The bill includes a provision first
enacted in fiscal year 1996 crediting to this appropriation proceeds
from the sale or lease of the Coast Guard's surplus real property. This
provision is included as requested in the President's budget.
HU 25 asset sales. --The Committee bill deletes language pertaining
to possible sales of HU 25 aircraft. Due to additional drug interdiction
funding in fiscal year 1999 and in this bill, the Coast Guard will be
re-activating the HU 25 aircraft rather than selling them, making this
language unnecessary.
Navigation user fees. --The bill does not include proposed bill
language regarding $41,000,000 in offsetting collections from new
navigation user fees, contingent upon authorization by the Congress.
These fees have not been authorized.
Icebreaker support for arctic research.-- As requested in the
budget, the Committee bill includes language (sec. 333) amending the
Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984 and the Arctic Marine Living
Resources Convention Act of 1984 regarding the coordination and review
of budget requests for icebreaker-related costs needed to support Arctic
and Antarctic research.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND RESTORATION
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $21,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 19,500,000
Recommended in the bill 18,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -3,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 -1,500,000
This appropriation assists in bringing Coast Guard facilities into
compliance with applicable federal, state and environmental regulations;
conducting facilities response plans; developing pollution and hazardous
waste minimization strategies; conducting environmental assessments; and
conducting necessary program support. These funds permit the
continuation of a service-wide program to correct environmental
problems, such as major improvements of storage tanks containing
petroleum and regulated substances. The program focuses mainly on Coast
Guard facilities, but also includes third party sites where Coast Guard
activities have contributed to environmental problems.
The Committee is pleased that the Coast Guard has made significant
progress in reducing the backlog of environmental restoration projects.
The estimated total cost to clean up the backlog of identified sites has
decreased from $132,000,000 in fiscal year 1993 to $60,000,000 at the
end of fiscal year 1998. Coast Guard currently estimates that the
restoration backlog will decrease by about $11,000,000 each year. The
Committee believes a lower level of funding reflects the good progress
made in this area.
The recommended funding level of $18,000,000 is a reduction of
$1,500,000 below the budget request and $3,000,000 below the fiscal year
1999 enacted level. The reduction is due to budget constraints and
should be allocated to general training and education activities, not
site-specific cleanup activities.
With the funds provided, the Coast Guard should give consideration to
a project for remediation of lead-contaminated soil at the former Coast
Guard lighthouse facility in Cape May, New Jersey.
ALTERATION OF BRIDGES
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $14,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 .........................
Recommended in the bill 15,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +1,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 +15,000,000
The bill includes funding for alteration of bridges deemed a hazard
to marine navigation pursuant to the Truman-Hobbs Act. The Committee
does not agree with the approach of the administration that obstructive
highway bridges and combination rail/highway bridges should be funded
out of the Federal Highway Administration's discretionary bridge
account, and notes that this proposal was not included in the TEA21
conference report. The purpose of altering these bridges is to improve
the safety of marine navigation under the bridge, not to improve surface
transportation on the bridge itself. Since in some cases, there are
unsafe conditions on the waterway beneath a bridge which has an adequate
surface or structural condition, Federal-aid highways funding is not
appropriate to address the purpose of the Truman-Hobbs program.
The Committee recommends $15,000,000 for four bridges. The Committee
directs that, of the funds provided, $8,000,000 shall be allocated to
the Sidney Lanier highway bridge in Brunswick, Georgia; $2,000,000 shall
be allocated to the Fourteen Mile Bridge over the Mobile River in
Mobile, Alabama; $2,000,000 shall be allocated to the Elgin, Joliet, and
Eastern Bridge in Morris, Illinois; and $3,000,000 shall be allocated to
the Florida Avenue railroad/highway combination bridge in New Orleans,
Louisiana.
RETIRED PAY
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $684,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 1 721,000,000
Recommended in the bill 721,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +37,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000
\1\The budget requested ``such sums as may be necessary''. The CBO estimate at the time of budget submission was $721,000,000.
This appropriation provides for the retired pay of military personnel
of the Coast Guard and the Coast Guard Reserve. Also included are
payments to members of the former Lighthouse Service and beneficiaries
pursuant to the retired serviceman's family protection plan and survivor
benefit plan, as well as payments for medical care of retired personnel
and their dependents under the Dependents Medical Care Act.
The Committee does not agree to insert the requested appropriation of
``such sums as may be necessary'', because it is unclear why this
appropriation should pose inherent and unresolvable difficulties in
accurately estimating program requirements. The bill provides
$721,000,000 which was CBO's estimate at the time the fiscal year 2000
budget was submitted. This compares to an appropriation of $684,000,000
for fiscal year 1999, an increase of 5.4 percent. This is scored as a
mandatory appropriation in the Congressional budget process.
RESERVE TRAINING
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999\1\ $74,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 72,000,000
Recommended in the bill 72,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -2,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000
\1\Includes $5,000,000 in emergency supplemental funding for drug interdiction activities.
This appropriation provides for the training of qualified individuals
who are available for active duty in time of war or national emergency
or to augment regular Coast Guard forces in the performance of peacetime
missions. Program activities fall into the following categories:
1. Initial training. --The direct costs of initial training for three
categories of non-prior service trainees.
2. Continued training. --The training of officer and enlisted
personnel.
3. Operation and maintenance of training facilities. --The day-to-day
operation and maintenance of reserve training facilities.
4. Administration. --All administrative costs of the reserve forces
program.
The bill includes $72,000,000 for reserve training, a decrease of
$2,000,000 (2.7 percent) below the fiscal year 1999 level and the same
as the budget request.
Reimbursement to ``Operating expenses''. --The recommendation
continues, with modification, a provision which limits the amount of
``Reserve training'' funds which may be transferred to ``Operating
expenses''. Given the small size of the reserve training appropriation,
and the declining size of the selected reserve, the Committee wants to
ensure the reserves are not assessed excessive charge-backs to the Coast
Guard operating budget. Much progress has been made over the past year
in resolving this issue, and the Committee is pleased to hear of the
cooperation extended by the Coast Guard and the Reserve community to
find a compromise. The Committee continues to believe that, absent any
provision, the proposed level of reimbursement might be too high, given
the substantial amount of augmentation workhours provided by the
reserves. However, the Committee understands that raising the limitation
from $20,000,000 to $23,000,000 will address the main concerns of the
Coast Guard and will be satisfactory to the reserves. Therefore, the
bill includes a limitation of $23,000,000, an increase of $3,000,000
above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level. The bill maintains the
provision relating to the assessment of ``direct charges'' which were
not in effect during fiscal year 1997.
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND EVALUATION
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999\1\ $17,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 21,709,000
Recommended in the bill 21,039,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +4,039,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 -670,000
\1\Includes $5,000,000 in emergency supplemental funding for drug interdiction activities in the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 1999.
The bill includes $21,039,000 for applied scientific research and
development, test and evaluation projects necessary to maintain and
expand the technology required for the Coast Guard's operational and
regulatory missions. Of this amount, $3,500,000 is to be derived from
the oil spill liability trust fund, as requested in the budget estimate.
This is $670,000 (3.1 percent) below the budget request but $4,039,000
(23.8 percent) above the amount provided for fiscal year 1999. The
reduction is due to budget constraints.
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
SUMMARY OF FISCAL YEAR 2000 PROGRAM
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is responsible for the
safety and development of civil aviation and the evolution of a national
system of airports. Most of the activities of the FAA will be funded
with direct appropriations in fiscal year 2000. The grants-in-aid for
airports program, however, will be financed under contract authority
with the program level established by a limitation on obligations
contained in the accompanying bill. The bill assumes continuation of the
aviation ticket tax and other related aviation excise taxes throughout
fiscal year 2000 and assumes no new user fees.
The recommended program level for the FAA for fiscal year 2000 totals
$10,548,000,000, including a $2,250,000,000 limitation on the use of
contract authority. Excluding emergency funds, this is $985,442,000
(10.3 percent) above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level and $417,000,000
(4.1 percent) above the President's request. The following table
summarizes the fiscal year 1999 program levels, the fiscal year 2000
program requests, and the Committee's recommendations:
Program Fiscal year--
1999 enacted 2000 estimate 2000 recommended
Operations\1\ $5,562,558,000 $6,039,000,000 $5,925,000,000
Facilities and equipment\2\ 1,900,000,000 2,319,000,000 2,200,000,000
Research, engineering and development 150,000,000 173,000,000 173,000,000
Grants-in-aid for airports (AIP)\3\ 1,950,000,000 1,600,000,000 2,250,000,000
----------------- ------------------ -------------------
Total 9,562,558,000 10,131,000,000 10,548,000,000
\1\Amount for fiscal year 1999 excludes $28,798,000 in supplemental emergency appropriations for Year 2000 compliance activities.
\2\Amount for fiscal year 1999 excludes $100,000,000 in supplemental emergency appropriations for counter-terrorism activities and $122,133,000 in supplemental emergency appropriations for Year 2000 compliance activities.
\3\Limitation on obligations from contract authority.
OPERATIONS
(airport and airway trust fund)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999\1\ $5,591,356,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 6,039,000,000
Recommended in the bill 5,925,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +333,644,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 -114,000,000
\1\Includes $28,798,000 in supplemental emergency funding for Year 2000 compliance activities.
This appropriation provides funds for the operation, maintenance,
communications, and logistical support of the air traffic control and
air navigation systems. It also covers administrative and managerial
costs for the FAA's regulatory, airports, medical, engineering and
development programs.
The operations appropriation includes the following major activities:
(1) operation on a 24-hour daily basis of a national air traffic system;
(2) establishment and maintenance of a national system of aids to
navigation; (3) establishment and surveillance of civil air regulations
to assure safety in aviation; (4) development of standards, rules and
regulations governing the physical fitness of airmen as well as the
administration of an aviation medical research program; (5)
administration of the acquisition, research and development programs;
(6) administration of the civil aviation security program; (7)
headquarters, administration and other staff offices; (8) publication
and distribution of aeronautical charts; and (9) administration of the
federal grants-in-aid program for airport construction.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $5,925,000,000 for FAA operations, an
increase of $333,644,000 (6.5 percent) above the level provided for
fiscal year 1999. Despite the severe budget constraints this year, the
percentage increase in this bill is 45 percent higher than that
recommended by the Committee last year. The recommended level compares
to $6,039,000 in the President's budget request.
A breakdown of the fiscal year 1999 enacted level, the fiscal year
2000 budget estimate, and the Committee recommendation by budget
activity is as follows:
Budget activity Fiscal year--
1999 enacted 2000 estimate 2000 recommended
Air traffic services $4,353,191,000 $4,696,487,000 $4,660,892,000
Aviation regulation & certification 630,418,000 667,631,000 667,416,000
Civil aviation security 122,641,000 144,642,000 144,642,000
Administration of airports 48,554,000 50,608,000 50,608,000
Research and acquisition 92,340,000 183,740,000 181,535,000
Commercial space transportation 6,168,000 6,838,000 6,838,000
Administration 257,514,000 --- ---
Regional coordination --- --- 95,831,000
Human resources --- --- 47,436,000
Financial services --- --- 35,790,000
Staff offices 76,193,000 289,054,000 77,669,000
Account-wide adjustments -24,461,000 --- -43,657,000
----------------- ----------------- -------------------
Total base appropriation 5,562,558,000 6,039,000,000 5,925,000,000
Y2K supplemental appropriations 28,798,000 --- ---
----------------- ----------------- -------------------
Total available funding 5,591,356,000 6,039,000,000 5,925,000,000
The Committee recommendation includes the following adjustments to
the budget estimate:
Budget activity
Change
Air Traffic Services:
+$2,500,000
-1,000,000
-12,190,000
-5,000,000
-5,600,000
+1,800,000
-1,000,000
-4,425,000
-3,000,000
-135,000
+5,000,000
+3,967,000
-12,122,000
-2,000,000
-770,000
-3,620,000
+2,000,000
Aviation Regulation and Certification:
+500,000
-715,000
Research and Acquisition:
-2,205,000
Regional Coordination:
+97,831,000
-2,000,000
Human Resources:
+48,736,000
-1,300,000
Financial Services:
+42,054,000
-6,264,000
Staff Offices:
-208,244,000
-1,500,000
-120,000
-2,021,000
+500,000
Account-wide Adjustments:
Fiscal year 1999 reductions extended into fiscal year 2000:
Freeze staffing for non-safety positions in fiscal year 1999 levels -3,400,000
Administrative contracts--IRM planning and maintenance -3,100,000
Administrative travel -4,200,000
Computer-aided engineering graphics -600,000
Resources management contract -410,000
Conpuretix conferencing/voice switch improvements -1,100,000
Reduce teleconferencing/videoconferencing -2,000,000
-8,960,000
-10,200,000
-6,600,000
-1,500,000
-1,587,000
Total -114,000,000
FAA FUNDING SITUATION
Over the past few years, the Department of Transportation and the FAA
have suggested that the Congressional budget process will be unable to
provide funding for the FAA's true needs in the future. In response to
this and other concerns, Congress established the National Civil
Aviation Review Commission and called for an independent assessment of
FAA's long-term finances. In 1997, the independent assessment concluded
that significant opportunities for cost savings and efficiencies exist
in the FAA, and should be taken advantage of. The independent assessment
made a number of cost-saving recommendations, some of which were echoed
by the National Civil Aviation Review Commission. In recommending
increases in the agency's budget last year, the Committee encouraged the
FAA to ``leverage this increase by making structural and process changes
in the agency to improve productivity and reduce waste, as suggested in
the independent assessment''.
However, despite these warnings that the agency needs to get its
operating costs under control, the FAA has implemented very few of these
recommendations, and last year signed new employee pay agreements which
provide even more upward pressure on the budget. In fiscal year 2000,
the FAA's average budgeted staffyear cost is approximately $100,000, up
20 percent in the past three years alone. At the same time, productivity
among the air traffic controller workforce declined in 1998 for the
third year in a row.
Furthermore, these increases are not limited to air traffic control.
The fiscal year 2000 budget requests significant increases in most
administrative accounts as well. In total, the agency requested
operating increases of approximately $491,000,000 for the next fiscal
year offset with less than $20,000,000 in savings from the
implementation of new technology or management efficiencies.
The Committee continues to believe that the federal budget process is
inherently and structurally capable of providing adequate resources for
the FAA. The resources in this bill confirm that fact by providing
increases above fiscal year 1999 in each of the four appropriations--and
double digit increases in three. However, the agency must do more
internally to control its rapidly increasing operating budget. As the
Inspector General testified this year, these escalating increases
threaten to choke off needed funding in capital programs for air traffic
control modernization and airport development.
SPECIAL BUDGETARY TREATMENT FOR FAA
The Committee continues to be strongly opposed to special budgetary
treatment for the FAA. Such a change would undermine the unified federal
budget process, where tradeoffs are made annually among all federal
programs. This year, the General Accounting Office testified before the
Subcommittee that ``when the [transportation] trust funds were created,
Congress did not create them as automatic spending trust funds. It chose
to retain annual oversight and control of spending from those funds in
the appropriations committees.'' This is made clear by a statement on
the Senate floor when the conference report establishing the aviation
trust fund was considered in 1970. In addressing a concern of the Nixon
administration that the new trust fund might establish funding
priorities outside the annual budget process, the manager of the bill in
the Senate (Senator Norris H. Cotton of New Hampshire) clarified ``the
use of trust fund moneys is subject to annual appropriations by the
Congress. It, therefore, is for the Appropriations Committees of the
respective Houses to review this program and through appropriations acts
establish the necessary priorities.'' The Congress created the aviation
trust fund based on this understanding. Special budgetary treatment,
whether through off-budget accounting, firewalls, guarantees, or other
mechanisms, fundamentally changes that principle to the detriment of the
federal budget process.
Secondly, such proposals unnecessarily shower billions of additional
dollars on one federal agency while other agencies with equally
important missions continue to feel severe pressure from government-wide
budget caps. The introduced version of H.R. 1000 would raise FAA's
funding by 57.4 percent over the five year period 1999 through
2004--from $9.8 billion to $15.4 billion. While the Committee remains
supportive of the FAA's important programs, reckless funding increases
should not be granted to one agency in isolation of the funding needs of
other agencies. The accompanying bill represents a 10-percent increase
for the FAA in fiscal year 2000, which is clearly sufficient for an
agency with annual workload increases of 1 to 3 percent. Within the
total amount available, the Committee bill raises airport construction
spending to the highest level in history, an increase of 15 percent over
fiscal year 1999. The Department of Transportation advised the Committee
this year that ``according to our airport master records, the condition
of airport runways has improved slightly over the past decade. These
records show that about 95 percent of the nation's runways are in good
to fair condition.'' In air traffic control modernization, FAA
accounting data indicate that the agency is having difficulty obligating
even the current level of funding. For example, the President's budget
proposal would raise budget authority by $212,388,000 in fiscal year
2000. However, at year's end, two-thirds of that funding would remain
unobligated. This argues for cost control, annual Congressional
oversight in the budget process and reasonable increases, which special
budgetary treatment would destroy.
Finally, the Committee reiterates that aviation users are actually
getting more from the Federal Government than they are paying in taxes,
due to a high rate of spending and the existence of large aviation
subsidies from the general fund taxpayer. The FAA testified the
following this year: ``In fact, since 1971 trust fund spending has
exceeded trust fund receipts, and the balances primarily result from
interest, including that on funds appropriated but not yet outlayed.''
In most years, the general fund taxpayer picks up about $3 billion of
the FAA's expenses due to a cap on trust fund expenses historically
mandated by the Congressional authorizing committees. In addition, at
least $1 billion in other general fund appropriations are made solely
for the benefit of aviation users. The Federal Government has more than
kept faith with aviation system taxpayers. The citizens who have been
shortchanged are general fund taxpayers, and this should be corrected.
GENERAL FUND SUBSIDY OF FAA'S BUDGET
The Appropriations Committee has long opposed the trust fund cap and
the associated general fund subsidy. The ``historic'' general fund share
has been provided in the Appropriations process only because the
authorization process has compelled it, resulting in a buildup of the
trust fund balance. This has perpetuated a fraud on the general fund
taxpayer which has gone on for many years. As the Inspector General
testified this year, ``an important reason why that balance is where it
is today, and it is about $4.3 billion, is because the general fund, or
non-aviation taxes, have covered an average of about 30 percent of FAA's
budget.''
The Committee continues to believe that the taxes paid by aviation
users should be spent, and not allowed to build up in the trust fund.
The Assistant Secretary of Transportation for Budget and Programs
testified this year that the best way to lower the cash balance in the
trust fund is ``to increase the share of operations that comes from the
trust fund.'' In order to spend down the trust fund balance and keep
faith with the general fund taxpayer, the bill reported by the Committee
finances the FAA's operations entirely from the aviation trust
fund--paid for by the users of FAA services. This is consistent with
current law and supported by the President's budget request.
USER FEES
The bill assumes the collection of no additional user fees in fiscal
year 2000 that were not Congressionally authorized for collection during
fiscal year 1999 and includes a provision prohibiting funds in this Act
from being used to plan or promulgate any regulation to institute any
new user fee not specifically authorized by law after the date of
enactment of this Act. The Committee interprets this prohibition to
include the proposed ``fees for providing production
certification-related services outside the United States'', promulgated
by final rule on October 27, 1997. Although FAA issued a final rule on
this matter days before enactment of the user fee prohibition, most of
these fees have not been imposed or collected. The Committee believes
that ``implementation'' of a new fee relates most directly to the
charging and collection of the fee, and not the administrative
requirement of issuing a final rule. Furthermore, unless fees have been
routinely collected on a systematic, industry-wide basis, fee programs
promulgated by the FAA shall not be deemed to have been implemented for
purposes of satisfying the provisions in this Act.
AVIATION SAFETY INITIATIVES
The Committee recommendation includes $61,363,000 in safety
initiatives above the administration's budget request. The Committee
continues to believe that aviation safety must be the agency's top
priority, and should not fall behind capacity enhancement programs such
as free flight phase one in the competition for limited budget
resources. In several instances, the Committee has found safety programs
which have lost needed funds in the agency's internal budget process,
and others which are not deemed a top priority because they support
general aviation. The Committee bill includes the following funds above
those in the budget estimate:
Activity
Increase
Operations:
$13,267,000
2,500,000
800,000
5,000,000
3,967,000
500,000
500,000
Facilities and Equipment:
35,642,000
2,128,000
7,000,000
3,900,000
20,614,000
2,000,000
Research and Development:
17,454,000
5,182,000
1,622,000
5,650,000
Total 61,363,00
FRANCHISE FUND
The Committee does not approve FAA's proposal to significantly expand
the range of activities performed by the agency's franchise fund,
including the majority of the FAA's logistics activities. The Committee
continues to believe that activities financed through the franchise fund
lose visibility in the annual budget process and are not subject to the
same scrutiny and budgetary competition as other activities within the
agency. Until the agency can clearly show significant savings from this
approach, the Committee believes the status quo should be maintained.
Air Traffic Services
The Committee recommends $4,660,892,000 for air traffic services, an
increase of $307,701,000 (7.1 percent) above the fiscal year 1999
enacted level. As the following chart indicates, this percentage
increase is far above the anticipated workload indicators for fiscal
year 2000. This is similar to past years.
[Graphic Image Not Available]
Adjustments to the budget estimate are as follows:
Runway incursion program enhancement. --Despite the FAA's activity
in this area, the problem of runway incursions continues to worsen.
Runway incursions rose in 1998 for the fifth year in a row, and now
occur at the rate of almost one per day. Although the agency has
developed an action plan, in testimony this year the Inspector General
said, ``The challenge now, in our opinion, is to set aside the funds and
to follow through on the plan * * * what we found * * * was that there
was no specific set-aside funding to carry out the activities. As a
result, FAA has made limited progress and milestones have been missed''.
When this problem was brought to light eighteen months ago, the agency
announced the establishment of airport-specific ``runway incursion
action teams'' to make recommendations at individual airports. At the
time of the Committee's aviation safety hearing this year, only 5 of the
20 teams had completed their work. The administrator testified that the
implementation plan was still ``working through the process'' in the
agency. The Committee does not intend to watch FAA repeat its actions of
the early 1990's, where a runway incursion plan was developed but never
implemented due to lack of resources and low management priority. The
Committee recommendation provides an additional $2,500,000 for a more
aggressive runway incursion program.
Host maintenance. --The Committee recommendation reduces funding for
maintenance of the Host computer system from $31,751,000 to $30,751,000
to reflect deployment of new technology in the Host and Oceanic System
Capability Replacement (HOCSR) project. The fiscal year 2000 budget
requested an increase over the previous year, failing to reflect the
deployment of upgraded systems.
Interim incentive pay (IIP). --Although the FAA's budget proposal
includes $19,942,000 to continue interim incentive pay, the Committee
believes this pay is no longer necessary due to provisions of the new
controller pay agreement. When Congress mandated a phase-out of the
original ``pay demonstration'' program a few years ago, the FAA
administratively established an interim pay program to replace it on a
temporary basis. The IIP was designed to provide additional funds for
hard-to-staff facilities until positions could be ``reclassified'' as
part of a new pay deal. Reclassification raises the base pay rates of
controllers at difficult, hard-to-staff facilities by raising the grade
levels in those facilities. Reclassification was included in the 1998
NATCA pay agreement, making interim incentive pay obsolete and
duplicative of the higher base pay. The recommendation begins a
multiyear phaseout of these funds by reducing IIP from $19,142,000 to
$6,952,000.
Air traffic overtime. --The Committee recommendation allows
approximately the same funding level for air traffic overtime as
provided in fiscal year 1999. This level is 61.8 percent above the
funding of two years ago. The Committee is pleased that the new
controller contract contains provisions which are expected to reduce air
traffic overtime. However, it does not appear that these productivity
improvements have been appropriately reflected in the fiscal year 2000
budget request. FAA did not use all of the appropriated overtime amounts
in fiscal year 1999, reprogramming them to other purposes. The
recommendation provides $49,000,000 compared to $54,000,000 in the
budget request.
Controller-in-charge. --The Committee recommendation defers further
implementation of the new controller-in-charge (CIC) position. Although
FAA's 1992 study found that operational errors rose when the number of
air traffic supervisors was decreased, the agency believes that, with
adequate training and planning, this problem can be overcome. For this
reason the agency began a phaseout of supervisors in fiscal year 1999,
and the fiscal year 2000 budget assumes a further reduction in
supervisors next year. However, the Inspector General has stated that
certain steps must be taken before this transition can be safely
accomplished, and the agency has not completed those steps. For example,
the agency says that the selection process for determining which
controllers are suitable to assume the role of CIC ``is being
developed''. Likewise, the FAA has offered no schedule for implementing
the four steps required under this program, even though they have
already initiated the transition. Operational error rates were up across
the board in 1998. Now is not the time to move too quickly in removing
supervisors. The Committee recommendation freezes the number of new CIC
positions at the fiscal year 1999 level, and defers further expansion.
This also requires restoration of the supervisor positions which were
proposed for elimination in the budget request.
Air traffic supervisor staffing. --This restores the air traffic
supervisor positions which were proposed for elimination in the
President's budget, as discussed above.
Air traffic sick leave. --The new controller contract includes an
innovative sick leave ``buy back'' provision which is expected to result
in less sick leave over the coming years. Under this program, the FAA
agrees to compensate a retiring controller for a portion of their
accrued sick leave. In the private sector, such flexibility has resulted
in program savings in the early years, when retirement buy backs are
small and employees are ``banking'' their sick leave hours. In fiscal
year 2000, this should result in less overtime requirements. However,
the fiscal year 2000 budget request assumes no savings from the buyback
provision. The Committee recommendation assumes savings of $1,000,000
from this improvement to the sick leave benefit.
Within-grade and grade-to-grade increases. --The administration's
budget requested $44,697,000 for within-grade and grade-to-grade
increases in the air traffic services organization. However, the new pay
agreement eliminated these automatic increases for air traffic
controllers and replaced them with new ``organizational success
increases'' (OSIs) and ``quality step increases'' (QSIs). Since the new
OSIs and QSIs are not automatic but based instead on superior
performance, it seems certain that the FAA's costs will be reduced in
this area. The Committee's recommendation assumes a reduction in
budgeted funds, reflecting program savings from the new agreement.
Airspace redesign. --The Committee recommends $6,622,000 for
airspace redesign efforts, compared to $3,000,000 enacted for fiscal
year 1999 and $9,622,000 in the budget estimate. The Committee believes
a 121 percent increase in one year is sufficient to address high
priority issues, especially since the FAA has been unable to explain how
much funding would be utilized for each geographic location. Of the
funds provided, $6,000,000 is to be allocated to redesign efforts in the
New York/New Jersey metropolitan area.
RTCA support. --A review of FAA's recent use of the Radio Technical
Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA, Inc.) indicates the agency is now
using this advisory committee in some roles which go far beyond that of
a traditional advisory committee. RTCA was established in 1935 to ensure
coordination in the technical development of aeronautical radio aids.
Over the past few years, however, RTCA has come more and more to be used
as the FAA's ``consensus builder'' with industry--an activity more
aligned with strategic planning or investment analysis than with a
traditional advisory committee. FAA officially describes RTCA's advisory
committee role as ``seeking solutions to problems involving the
application of technology (e.g., electronics, computers, and
telecommunications) to aeronautical operations that impact the future
air traffic management system''. This objective is so broad as to
encompass virtually all of the FAA's modernization program and many of
its operating activities as well. Furthermore, given membership in this
organization by firms in the electronics, aerospace, and airline
industries, conflict of interest questions argue for a more limited
role. For example, FAA is using this organization to set standards and
specifications for new NAS systems, and to define tradeoffs among
competing systems. Although the Committee values the work of RTCA, the
FAA and Congress should maintain an appropriate relationship and not use
RTCA simply out of convenience. In some instances, there are numerous
consulting firms without a financial stake in particular NAS
modernization programs which can perform these activities on a
competitive basis. The Committee recommendation allows $300,000 for RTCA
support, a reduction of $135,000 from the budget estimate and 10 percent
below the fiscal year 1999 level. This funding level is consistent with
FAA Order 1110.77M, which estimated annual RTCA annual support at
$300,000. The Committee passes no judgment about the work being
performed by RTCA, Incorporated, but believes that RTCA should have a
more limited role, and that a portion of the work should either be
conducted in-house by the agency or solicited under a competitive
procurement.
General aviation safety initiative. --According to FAA statistics
and projections, general aviation activity is increasing at a faster
rate than commercial aviation, and accounts for many of the disturbing
increases in aviation safety problems such as operational errors, pilot
deviations, and runway incursions. Near mid-air collisions are remaining
constant, but still occur in this country on a rate of one every other
day. FAA explains that the inability to reduce near mid-air collisions
is largely due to rising general aviation activity. Despite these
trends, however, FAA budget initiatives for next year are inadequate to
address the problem, and may worsen it. The Committee remains very
supportive of general aviation, and therefore recommends additional
funding for a new initiative to improve safety. These projects are
described below:
Contract tower cost-sharing program. --The
recommendation provides $5,000,000 to continue the contract
tower cost-sharing program, which provides a federal cost
share to establish new contract towers. This program was
initiated at Congressional direction in fiscal year 1999.
According to the FAA, the agency did request funding to
continue this program; however, this funding was deleted at a
later stage in the administrative budget process. The
recommended amount is $1,000,000 below the level provided last
year.
Aviation safety program. --The bill provides an
additional $500,000 to the $150,000 requested for this
important safety program, which is funded under ``Aviation
regulation and certification''. This program provides
educational materials for general aviation pilots. This is
similar to the recommendation made by the Committee in fiscal
year 1999.
Flight service station staffing. --FAA's budget
proposal to eliminate 90 flight service station positions is
predicated on increased voluntary use of the direct user
access terminal service (DUATS). However, use of this service
has remained nearly level over the past four years. While
towers and centers will experience only slight increases in
workload in fiscal year 2000, the FAA is projecting a 25
percent increase in workload at the flight service stations.
The Committee finds it highly unlikely that use of DUATS will
go up enough next year to handle the projected volume, based
on past history. Furthermore, DUATS is being incorporated into
the new OASIS system, which is experiencing developmental
delays. While the Committee has been supportive in past years
of consolidating the flight service stations, the closing of
stations was completed in 1997. Since the number of stations
has been stable since that time and newer technology has not
yet been fielded, the Committee believes it would be unsafe to
contemplate further reductions. The Committee recommendation
restores the $3,967,000 proposed for elimination.
OASIS. --An additional $20,614,000 above the budget
estimate is provided under ``Facilities and equipment'' to
maintain the schedule for the OASIS computer project for the
flight service stations. The current Model One Full Capability
system was obsolete when it was first deployed in the early
1990s and must be replaced by OASIS as soon as possible. In
order to satisfy human factors issues raised by air traffic
controllers, additional funding is required next year. The FAA
must keep this program on track to maintain the current level
of service and safety to general aviation pilots.
NAS handoff. --The National Airspace System (NAS) handoff program
provides operating and maintenance money for new NAS systems. Since
development of the budget estimate, schedules for several new systems
have slipped, and the recommendations in this bill will require
adjustment in other schedules as well. Because the budget assumption is
no longer valid, the recommendation reduces the $85,500,000 request for
NAS handoff funding by $12,122,000.
Reductions from fiscal year 1999 extended into 2000. --In fiscal
year 1999, the FAA implemented a number of efficiencies in their
operating account with no adverse effect on safety. Although the agency
budgeted funds to restore 100 percent of those reductions in the coming
year, the Committee believes that some of the administrative reductions
can be extended into fiscal year 2000 with little or no effect on the
agency's ability to carry out its missions. This is necessary given the
huge increases in the agency's budget proposal and the inability to
control costs in other areas. The Committee recommendation extends
$20,430,000 of the fiscal year 1999 reduction, or approximately 8
percent of the total. The specific reductions are shown in the table
below.
Terminal leave savings -$2,000,000
Performance awards -770,000
Air traffic travel -3,620,000
Freeze staffing for non-safety positions at fiscal year 1999 levels -3,400,000
Administrative contracts--IRM planning/maintenance -3,100,000
Administrative travel -4,200,000
Computer-aided engineering graphics -600,000
Resource management contract -410,000
Conpuretix conferencing/voice switch improvements -1,100,000
Reduce teleconferencing/videoconferencing -2,000,000
Administrative travel. --The Committee is especially concerned about
one item shown in the above list. Despite the Committee's attempts to
hold down administrative travel costs, FAA accounting data indicate
those costs continue to rise. For example, in 1998 costs for site visits
within the United States were up by 9.4 percent; costs of travel to
deliver speeches in foreign countries were up 11.9 percent; and ``other
travel'' within the United States was up 13.1 percent. To encourage
stronger control, the Committee extends into fiscal year 2000 a
reduction of $4,200,000 in administrative travel. If the agency cannot
hold down these costs, deeper reductions will be considered in future
years.
MARC. --The recommendation includes $2,000,000 to continue operating
support for the Mid-America Aviation Resource Consortium (MARC) in
Minnesota. This program has been funded for many years.
AVIATION REGULATION AND CERTIFICATION
The Committee recommends $667,416,000 for aviation regulation and
certification, $215,000 below the budget request and an increase of
$36,998,000 (5.9 percent) above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level.
Aviation safety program. --FAA's flight standards service conducts a
program known as the aviation safety program (ASP), which produces and
distributes safety educational programs and materials for general
aviation pilots. Since the large majority of aviation accidents in this
country are general aviation accidents, the Committee believes that a
small increase in this area could result in a large payoff. The bill
includes an increase of $500,000 above the budget estimate.
Rulemaking. --Given the ``Challenge 2000'' study and National Civil
Aviation Review Commission recommendations that FAA's rulemaking process
should be streamlined, as well as the view in Congress that regulations
should be held at the minimum level necessary, the Committee does not
find it justified to increase the rulemaking budget by 21.7 percent, as
the fiscal year 2000 budget assumes. The Committee recommendation holds
these costs to the fiscal year 1999 level, a reduction of $715,000 below
the budget estimate. The recommendation includes a deletion of $632,000
for three new staffyears requested (two for the office of general
counsel and one for the office of policy and international aviation) to
review new rulemaking actions.
Ground tracking and reporting system. --Between 1993 and 1997,
runway incursions in this country increased nearly 72 percent. The most
common cause of incursion is a situation where pilots fail to hold short
of the active runway, turn onto the wrong taxiway, and cross a runway
without clearance. One of the emerging technologies to address this
problem is based on in-pavement inductive loop sensors, a technology
which this Committee has funded for several years. The ground tracking
and reporting system (GSTARS) incorporates this type of loop technology
and provides aircraft and ground vehicle detection, classification, and
tracking in all weather and visibility conditions. GSTARS provides
increased situational awareness and tracking of ground traffic to air
traffic controllers and alerts controllers to potential runway and
taxiway incursions. The Committee directs FAA to conduct the evaluations
necessary to initiate the certification review process for the GSTARS
inductive loop system. The Committee bill includes a 6 percent increase
for certification and regulation activities, which is sufficient for the
FAA to move this program forward in an aggressive manner.
Helicopter noise, New York City, NY. --Residents in New York City
and in other large urban districts have raised safety and noise concerns
due to increased helicopter traffic. Since 1991, the volume of
helicopter traffic in New York City has increased by 23 percent.
Currently, there are between 200 and 400 flights, mostly over Manhattan,
every day. The FAA estimates that 50 percent of those flights are
tourist-related. New York City had laws to restrict flights from
heliports, but those laws were struck down by a federal court judge as
unconstitutional. The court ruled that the Federal Government has sole
power to regulate air traffic. However, the FAA believes Congress has
never enacted a statute giving it the ability to regulate helicopter
traffic for any reason other than safety. The Committee recommends that
FAA develop plans to deal with public complaints regarding helicopter
noise, traffic, and safety issues.
CIVIL AVIATION SECURITY
The Committee recommends $144,642,000 for civil aviation security,
the same as the budget estimate and an increase of $22,001,000 (17.9
percent) above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level.
Certification of baggage screening firms. --The Committee is
disturbed to learn that FAA's proposed rule regarding certification of
baggage screening firms has been delayed by nine months over the past
year, and is currently scheduled for issuance of a final rule in
December 2000. The FAA testified this year that ``these standards and
requirements are important because they would compel screening companies
to hire and compensate qualified, skilled employees, train them
effectively, and accept more responsibility for the effectiveness of
their operations''. The Subcommittee held a special hearing this year on
airport security operations, and discovered several holes in the
security net--mostly relating to screener performance. FAA data indicate
the turnover rate among screeners is much too high (110 percent a year,
with some airports as high as 430 percent), and the wages remain too low
to retain the best people. As FAA testified, ``there has to be a much
greater concentration on retaining people and training them; and in
order to retain them, they are going to have to be compensated better''.
Particularly in light of the recent test results, the Committee believes
the FAA needs to give this area urgent attention. Consequently, the
Committee directs FAA to take all actions necessary to accelerate the
screening company certification rulemaking in order to issue a final
rule no later than March 31, 2000.
Utilization of explosive detection systems. --The DOT and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 required the FAA to certify that air
carriers had substantially increased the usage of bulk explosive
detection systems procured for them by the Federal Government. This
certification was provided by the FAA earlier this year. The Committee
was disturbed to learn, however, that usage of the machines dropped
significantly right after the certification was provided. The FAA's
certification was based upon data between April and June 1998, which
showed usage of 2,151 bags per machine per week. According to the DOT
Inspector General, usage dropped in the third quarter of 1998 and even
further in the fourth quarter. In January and February 1999, the usage
rate was down to 1,630, negating the gains the Committee hoped to see
sustained. The Inspector General testified: ``CAPS [computer assisted
profiling system] . . . should not stand alone . . . The explosive
detection equipment has demonstrated a capacity to screen significantly
more bags per day than are being offered to it, and should be used more
often''. The Committee reiterates its firm beliefs that these systems
are not of much security value unless they are used, and that the
taxpayers should not continue federal support for acquisition of these
systems unless such support is predicated on maximum usage. The FAA is
directed to work more effectively than it has to date with the airlines
to ensure immediate improvements in the per system utilization rate. The
Committee notes that one simple method of achieving this result is to
raise the percentage of random selectees chosen by the CAPS system. The
Committee intends to monitor this issue closely over the coming months.
ADMINISTRATION OF AIRPORTS
The Committee recommends $50,608,000 for the administration of
airports program, no change from the budget estimate and $2,054,000 (4.2
percent) above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level.
RESEARCH AND ACQUISITION
The Committee recommends $181,535,000 for research and acquisition, a
reduction of $2,205,000 below the budget request. This activity finances
the planning, management, and coordination of FAA's research and
acquisition programs.
``Human capital management'' project. --The recommendation deletes
funding for the proposed ``human capital management'' project, a
reduction of $2,205,000 from the budget estimate. When the Committee
approved personnel and procurement reform in 1995, it was assumed that
these initiatives would result in cost savings and efficiencies in the
agency. In this case, the FAA has established a new, costly
administrative process which is only vaguely described in justification
material. The Committee encourages the FAA to find ways to implement
personnel management improvements out of existing funding levels, rather
than requesting additional funds.
COMMERCIAL SPACE TRANSPORTATION
The Committee recommends $6,838,000 for the Office of Commercial
Space Transportation (OCST), the same as the budget request and $670,000
(10.9 percent) above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level.
ADMINISTRATION
Due to elimination of the organization for the Associate
Administrator for Administration in July 1998, FAA is proposing to
distribute all their administrative costs, to other parts of the budget.
Although the Committee supports the elimination of an unnecessary layer
of management in the agency, it is still useful for budgetary purposes
to differentiate between administrative and non-administrative costs.
For this reason, the Committee recommends the replacement of the larger
``administration'' budget activity with three new budget activities, for
regional coordination, human resources, and financial services. This
budget structure aligns appropriately with organizational elements
established in 1998.
In total, the FAA's fiscal year 2000 budget requested increases
totaling 11 percent in administrative activities. Given budget
constraints and the need to preserve large increases for other parts of
FAA's organization, the Committee recommendation allows a 1.5 percent
increase. This results in reductions from the budget estimate totaling
$32,328,000. The Committee believes the agency can and should do more to
find cost efficiencies in the administrative area, but leaves it to the
management attention of the agency to determine the most cost-effective
areas for restraint.
REGIONAL COORDINATION
The Committee recommends $95,831,000 for regional coordination, an
increase of $4,563,000 (5 percent) above the fiscal year 1999 enacted
level. The President's budget included $101,441,000 under ``staff
offices'' for these activities. A reduction of $2,000,000 from the
budget estimate reflects a slip in the occupancy schedule for Federal
Office Building 10 B since submission of the fiscal year 2000 budget.
Human Resources
The Committee recommends $47,436,000 for human resources, an increase
of $2,258,000 (5 percent) above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level. The
President's budget included $55,877,000 under ``staff offices'' for
these activities. The recommendation includes reduction of $1,300,000 in
the budget estimate for ``operationalizing the flexibilities of
personnel reform''. The Committee believes these flexibilities
inherently provide resources to offset any new procedures through
paperwork reduction, streamlining and other initiatives.
Sexual harassment cases. --The Committee recognizes the FAA
Administrator's prompt response to concerns regarding sexual harassment
within the FAA in creating the FAA Sexual Harassment Accountability
Board. The Committee expects that the FAA Administrator will investigate
and resolve expeditiously the significant backlog of cases that are
still pending. The Committee urges that this backlog of cases be
eliminated by September 30, 2000.
Safety-related training activities. --The Committee urges the FAA to
fund implementation of the air safety and security training program
developed by the George Washington University/Virginia Campus Aviation
Institute and the George Mason University Institute for Public Policy.
The program will prepare the workforce for careers in aviation safety
and security management and will train civil aviation personnel in
category II and category III countries, as rated by FAA's International
Aviation Safety Assessment (IASA) program, to assist in raising the
country's safety level to category I.
Financial Services
The Committee recommends $35,790,000 for financial services, an
increase of $1,705,000 (5 percent) above the fiscal year 1999 enacted
level. The President's budget included $50,926,000 under ``staff
offices'' for these activities. Included in the recommendation is a
deletion of the $6,264,000 for development of the integrated personnel
and payroll system (IPPS), pending further justification and evaluation
of alternatives. The FAA has advised the Committee that an agency
decision on the acquisition approach and evaluation of alternatives will
be completed in July 1999. The Committee defers these funds until this
important information can be reviewed.
The Committee notes that the budget request for this activity
included a 43.4 percent increase in personnel compensation and benefits,
even though, at the time of this year's budget hearing, there were 11
vacant positions.
Staff Offices
The Committee recommends $77,669,000 for certain headquarters staff
offices funded in this budget activity, a reduction of $3,141,000 below
the budget estimate.
Resources maintained in other lines of business. --The
recommendation does not agree with the budget proposal to transfer and
raise funding from the now-defunct ``administration'' budget activity to
this location. The recommendation deletes the $208,244,000 included in
the President's budget, and transfers funding for those activities, at
reduced levels, to the three new budget activities discussed above.
Personnel compensation and benefits reduction. --The Committee
believes the requested funding for personnel compensation and benefits
for staff offices is excessive given the staffing increases proposed for
certain offices and the large number of current vacancies. The Committee
recommends a reduction of $1,500,000 in this area. None of the reduction
shall be allocated to the Office of International Aviation, including
overseas offices, due to the importance of these offices in improving
aviation safety, as discussed below.
International aviation oversight.-- The Committee is concerned over
the growing number of fatalities of United States citizens traveling on
foreign air carriers. Although travelers on domestic carriers enjoyed
one of their safest years in 1998, fatalities of U.S. citizens on
foreign airlines rose for the fourth consecutive year, from 2 in 1994 to
109 in 1998. The magnitude of these fatalities appears to be rising as
our airlines become more economically entwined with their foreign
counterparts. Over the past ten years, 25 percent of the U.S. fatalities
in commercial aviation accidents were on non-U.S. carriers, and
approximately half of the people flying to and from this country now
travel on foreign carriers. The economic success of code sharing and
global airline alliances may push these numbers higher in future years
unless action is taken. The Chairman of the National Transportation
Safety Board testified this year: ``Several years ago, the FAA acted on
Safety Board recommendations regarding one level of safety between small
commuter airlines and large air carriers. As code sharing agreements
continue to increase, we plan to monitor this situation very closely.''
In addition, since the hull loss accident rate in this country is
many times lower than the worldwide average, the greatest leverage for
improving aviation safety lies in improving regulatory oversight and
infrastructure investment not in the U.S., but in foreign nations. The
FAA can play a vital role in advising and assisting foreign governments
and aviation authorities on how to improve their safety programs.
Especially given internal budget decisions being made by the agency, the
Committee is concerned that the safety trend could worsen unless the FAA
steps up its safety oversight of foreign air carriers. The Committee
directs the FAA to submit, not later than February 15, 2000, a report to
the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations which describes the
actions being taken by the agency to improve international aviation
safety, the resources allocated to those efforts over the preceding five
years, and a detailed plan for future activities over the next five
years.
Public affairs streamlining. --The President's budget assumes
staffing levels in fiscal year 2000 which are 1 staffyear above the
fiscal year 1999 level and 2 staffyears above the 1998 level. The
Committee believes these administrative costs should be held to the
lowest amount possible, and consequently recommends a reduction of
$120,000, reflecting a reduction of 2 staffyears.
Office of general counsel. --The FAA states that because this office
has taken on more responsibilities than its budget will allow, the
budget of the office must be raised--by 11 percent in fiscal year 2000.
The Committee believes this type of circular logic provides insufficient
justification for a large budgetary increase, and demonstrates the lack
of cost control at the FAA. The bill includes a 4 percent increase,
which results in a reduction from the budget estimate of $2,021,000.
English language proficiency. --The recommendation provides an
additional $500,000 for the office of policy and international affairs
to continue its important activities in the assessment and promotion of
English language proficiency in air traffic control systems of foreign
nations around the world. The Committee continues to support this work,
which was initiated by the Committee two years ago. Funding of $350,000
was appropriated for this activity in fiscal year 1999.
Congressional reports. --Last July, the Committee directed FAA to
submit, no later than December 31, 1998, a report detailing the costs of
the new air traffic controller pay agreement and the extent to which
those costs are offset by productivity improvements. This three page
report was submitted on May 18, 1999--ten months after the request was
made and almost five months late. The Committee does not ask for
frivolous reports or set casually the reporting dates. The Committee
expects the agency and the administration to take these requirements
more seriously in the future. If not, the Committee will consider
putting report requirements in bill language with penalties for
noncompliance.
Accountwide Adjustments
The Committee recommends accountwide adjustments resulting in a net
decrease of $43,657,000 below the budget estimate. These adjustments are
discussed below.
Y2K program savings. --Through February 1999, the FAA received
$14,946,000 in emergency supplemental appropriations to address the Year
2000 (Y2K) problem. Only $5,986,000 has been removed from the FAA's
operating budget base in its fiscal year 2000 budget. Although other
one-time costs were identified and subtracted, the Committee cannot
identify the reduction of other Y2K funds from the budget base. These
were one-time funds and will not be needed in fiscal year 2000. The
recommendation deletes these funds, a reduction of $8,960,000 below the
budget estimate.
Transportation administrative service center. --The fiscal year 2000
budget requested $38,912,000 for FAA's contribution to the
Transportation Administrative Service Center, which is managed by the
office of the secretary. This is clearly excessive, given the need to
control administrative costs department-wide. The Committee
recommendation freezes these costs at the fiscal year 1999 level, and
includes bill language limiting funding to this level. This results in a
savings of $10,200,000 from the budget estimate.
GSA rental payments. --The Committee bill provides an increase of 8
percent for GSA rental payments instead of the 16.8 percent requested
due to budget constraints and the need to restrain cost growth in
administrative accounts. This results in a reduction of $6,600,000 below
the budget estimate.
Contractual studies. --Funding for contract studies rose in fiscal
year 1999, despite the Committee's reduction last year, and is budgeted
for another increase in fiscal year 2000. The Committee recommends
$3,466,000, the average cost experienced over the two previous fiscal
years, and a reduction of $1,500,000 from the budget estimate.
General working agreement, Transportation Systems Center. --Due to
budget constraints, the Committee recommends holding costs for the
general working agreement with the Volpe National Transportation Systems
Center to a 5 percent increase instead of the 21.1 percent increase
requested. This reduction is without prejudice to the work being done at
that facility.
Nassif building rental costs. --The Committee directs FAA to work
with the Transportation Administrative Services Center and GSA to ensure
that, during the transition of FAA employees out of the Nassif building,
the FAA's GSA rental costs are reduced in a fair manner reflecting the
reduced usage of that space. The Committee does not believe FAA should
be charged for space which the agency no longer occupies.
Senior executive service bonuses and workers compensation program
costs. --The Committee encourages the FAA, especially in these tight
budgetary times, to monitor carefully the agency's rising costs for the
workers' compensation program and for bonuses paid to members of the
senior executive service (SES). In 1998, workers' compensation costs
were up 7.4 percent, after six years of virtually zero growth. This
occurred with a caseload growth of only 1 percent, and with
government-wide cost growth of only 2.9 percent. In particular, medical
costs were up 20.3 percent compared to growth of 5.6 percent
government-wide. In the case of SES bonuses, the agency's costs and
number of awards have more than doubled over the past five years. The
agency currently has approximatel1y 180 SES positions and a budget for
SES bonuses of almost $400,000. The Committee encourages FAA to monitor
this area carefully.
Bill Language
Manned auxiliary flight service stations. --The Committee bill
includes the limitation requested in the President's budget prohibiting
funds from being used to operate a manned auxiliary flight service
station in the contiguous United States. The FAA budget includes no
funding to operate such stations during fiscal year 2000.
Second career training program. --Once again this year, the
Committee bill includes a prohibition on the use of funds for the second
career training program. This prohibition has been in annual
appropriations Acts for many years, and is included in the President's
budget request.
Sunday premium pay. --The bill retains a provision begun in fiscal
year 1995 which prohibits the FAA from paying Sunday premium pay except
in those cases where the individual actually worked on a Sunday. The
statute governing Sunday premium pay (5 U.S.C. 5546(a)) is very clear:
``An employee who performs work during a regularly scheduled 8-hour
period of service which is not overtime work as defined by section
5542(a) of this title a part of which is performed on Sunday is entitled
to * * * premium pay at a rate equal to 25 percent of his rate of basic
pay.'' Disregarding the plain meaning of the statute and previous
Comptroller General decisions, however, in Armitage v. United States,
the Federal Circuit Court held in 1993 that employees need not actually
perform work on a Sunday to receive premium pay. The FAA was required
immediately to provide back pay totaling $37,000,000 for time scheduled
but not actually worked between November 1986 and July 1993. Without
this provision, the FAA would be liable for significant unfunded
liabilities, to be financed by the agency's annual operating budget.
This provision is identical to that in effect for fiscal years 1995
through 1999, and as requested by the administration in the fiscal year
2000 President's budget.
O'Hare Airport slot management. --The bill maintains the general
provision (sec. 326) enacted beginning in fiscal year 1995 which
prohibits funding to implement or enforce regulations that would result
in slot allocations for international operations to any carrier at
O'Hare Airport in excess of the number of slots allocated to and
scheduled by that carrier as of the first day of the 1993 1994 winter
season, if that international slot is withdrawn from an air carrier
under existing regulations for slot withdrawals.
Restrictions on leases. --The bill maintains restrictions on
multiyear leases and for satellite service leases for the wide area
augmentation system, as enacted in fiscal year 1999.
User fees. --The bill maintains a limitation on funds for activities
to plan, develop, or implement new user fees not specifically authorized
by the Congress after the date of enactment of this Act. This provision
is identical to that enacted for fiscal year 1999. The Committee is
concerned over FAA's statements that the User Fee Statute might provide
blanket legislative authority to impose new fees. The Committee does not
believe the Constitution envisions that agencies will augment their
appropriations administratively using general statements of the Congress
regarding fees. Such action, if adopted on a widescale basis, could
seriously undermine the Constitutional ``power of the purse'' vested in
the Congress. The Committee believes that any new fee not currently
being imposed and collected should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis
by the Congress and specifically authorized.
Aeronautical charting and cartography. --The bill includes a
provision which prohibits funds in this Act from being used to conduct
aeronautical charting and cartography (AC&C) activities through the
transportation administrative services center (TASC). The administration
has proposed that these activities be transferred from FAA to the TASC,
despite the wishes and recommendations of this Committee. The Committee
believes this would be detrimental to the efficient conduct of the AC&C
program and cannot fathom how TASC would perform this work more
effectively than the FAA, which interacts regularly with the general
aviation community and has responsibilities for oversight of general
aviation safety.
Centennial of Flight Commission. --The bill specifies that, out of
the funds provided, $600,000 shall be for activities of the Centennial
of Flight Commission. This compares to $250,000 enacted for fiscal year
1999.
FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
(Airport and Airway Trust Fund)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 1 $2,122,133,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 2,319,000,000
Recommended in the bill 2,200,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +77,867,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 -119,000,000
1Includes $100,000 in supplemental emergency funding for counter-terrorism activities and $122,133,000 in supplemental emergency funding for Year 2000 compliance activities.
The Facilities and Equipment (F&E) account is the principal means for
modernizing and improving air traffic control and airway facilities. The
appropriation also finances major capital investments required by other
agency programs, experimental research and development facilities, and
other improvements to enhance the safety and capacity of the airspace
system.
ATC Capital Needs and the Congressional Budget Process
The Committee does not agree with those who suggest that the federal
budget process will be unable to provide for the high-priority air
traffic control modernization needs of the FAA. To the contrary, the
current budget process does not impose fixed or immutable budget limits.
As the GAO and the DOT Inspector General have repeatedly stated, FAA's
modernization problems have not been the result of inadequate funding,
but instead by weak management at the FAA and lack of priority-setting.
When additional needs are justified, they are provided in the current
process--with a prime example being the increased funding provided in
this bill. The 4.5 percent increase recommended is greater than the
government-wide spending increases for next year under the discretionary
caps, and greater than what will be approved for capital programs in
many other federal agencies.
Funding Responsibility for Navigation Systems
For several years, the Committee has directed FAA not to shift
funding responsibility for air traffic control equipment items which
have historically been acquired and maintained by the Federal
Government. The Committee reiterates that the procurement and
maintenance of navigational aids, landing aids, and approach lighting
systems are generally the responsibility of the government, as part of
the ``contract'' that aviation passengers and general aviation pilots
enter into through the payment of aviation excise taxes. The FAA has the
responsibility to provide a national system of air traffic control
equipment and services. The Committee believes that proposals to shift a
subset of these responsibilities to airports is inappropriate and could
result in the diminution of aviation safety, since airports are neither
staffed nor funded to assume ownership, operation, or maintenance of
such equipment. The procurement and maintenance of such equipment should
remain a financial responsibility of the FAA, and the agency should not
move forward on any proposal to transfer this responsibility without
specific Congressional authorization.
Capital Investment Plan
The bill includes a new provision requiring the FAA to submit a
long-range capital plan which sets priorities among competing
requirements and is restrained to the likely or historic level of
funding. Although the FAA has both an ``Aviation Capital Investment
Plan'' and a ``NAS Architecture Plan'', neither of these documents show
how the pieces of the modernization effort fit together in the FAA's
budget requests, or how they fit into likely future year budgets. FAA's
accounting of the costs of these approved projects are far in excess of
likely budgets, indicating that the agency has done an inadequate job of
setting priorities among the broad range of valid programs. Although
these documents provide a starting point, the Committee believes the FAA
must take the next step and develop a credible, funding constrained,
multiyear capital plan which lists funding by each project. This could
be developed as an annex to the existing planning documents, but it
should be updated each year with submission of the President's budget.
Therefore, the bill includes language requiring the FAA to develop and
submit to the Congressional appropriations and authorization committees
a five year capital investment plan which is constrained to the outyear
funding levels provided by the Office of Management and Budget. The
Committee intends to carry this language each year if necessary,
requiring annual submission of an updated plan with the President's
budget request. Similar language has been included for the U.S. Coast
Guard, which also lacks such a plan.
ACQUISITION REFORM
In March 1996, the FAA announced that three programs had been
selected, in the agency's words, to ``lead the fleet'' of acquisition
reform. Subsequently, a fourth program was added. The FAA said that each
team would be ``responsible for a program that has been specifically
selected to demonstrate the benefits expected from acquisition reform
over the next three years.'' According to the director of acquisition,
the specific programs included to lead the fleet were chosen ``because
we wanted to start carefully and make sure we got off on the right
foot.'' These programs were OASIS, the Integrated Terminal Weather
System (ITWS), the Oceanic Automation System, and the NAS Infrastructure
Management System (NIMS). After the three years specified in the ``lead
the fleet'' announcement, the Committee is disappointed that three of
the programs have been restructured due to severe cost growth and
schedule delay, and the fourth has also experienced difficulties. The
Committee continues to encourage FAA to use acquisition reform
principles to ensure that programs can be delivered on time and within
the budgeted cost.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $2,200,000,000 for this
program, an increase of $77,867,000 (3.7 percent) above the level
provided for fiscal year 1999 and $119,000,000 below the budget
estimate. The bill provides that of the total amount recommended,
$1,917,000,000 is available for obligation until September 30, 2000, and
$283,000,000 (the amount for personnel and related expenses) is
available until September 30, 2000. These obligation availabilities are
consistent with past appropriations Acts and the same as the budget
request. The bill does not include the requested advance appropriations,
because the administration has done little to justify the requirement
and because many of the systems are still in development, where advance
appropriations are inappropriate.
TOP PRIORITY PROGRAMS
The recommended bill supports FAA's highest priority modernization
programs, providing 92.2 percent of the amount requested. According to
the FAA, the agency's five most important F&E programs are shown below,
with the associated funding levels in this bill:
Program Request Provided
Free flight phase one $184,800,000 $179,625,000
Wide area augmentation system 108,100,000 102,700,000
Display system replacement 95,800,000 95,800,000
STARS 195,240,000 158,900,000
Electric power systems sustainment 17,500,000 17,500,000
---------------- --------------
The bill also provides $49.3 million in new or expanded
safety-related programs, above the budget request, as shown below:
Program Request Provided
Low cost ASDE acquisition $7,000,000
AMASS safety system $11,700,000 15,600,000
Weather and radar processor 12,872,000 15,000,000
DBRITE 1,400,000
OASIS 21,486,000 42,100,000
Low level windshear alert system 2,200,000 4,200,000
Runway visual range (RVR) 2,000,000 6,300,000
Approach lighting system improvement (ALSIP) 2,700,000 7,700,000
Distance Measuring Equipment 1,200,000 4,200,000
--------------- ------------
The Committee believes that shifting 8 percent of the funding for
FAA's top modernization programs--which are mostly oriented to capacity
enhancement--to new safety initiatives is a good investment. These
modest changes address some of the National Transportation Safety
Board's concerns in areas such as runway incursion and hazardous weather
without causing serious delay to existing modernization efforts.
The following chart shows the fiscal year 1999 enacted level, the
fiscal year 2000 budget estimate and the Committee recommendation for
each of the projects funded by this appropriation:
Title Fiscal year-- Recommended in the bill
1999 enacted 2000 estimated
Engineering Development, Test and Evaluation: $52,566,000 $33,166,100 $33,166,100
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Subtotal--Adv Dev/Prototyping 52,566,000 33,166,100 49,166,100
=============== ================ ===============
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Subtotal--En route programs 177,500,000 266,712,000 245,982,000
=============== ================ ===============
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Subtotal--Terminal programs 99,200,000 58,900,000 158,900,000
=============== ================ ===============
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Subtotal--Landing/NAVAIDS 126,175,000 72,200,000 64,800,000
=============== ================ ===============
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Subtotal, RDT&E equipment and facilities 17,790,000 16,300,000 16,300,000
=============== ================ ===============
Total Activity 1 473,231,000 447,278,100 535,148,100
=============== ================ ===============
Air Traffic Control Facilities and Equipment: 5,700,000
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Subtotal--en route programs 361,742,400 410,557,400 387,492,000
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
=============== ================ ===============
Subtotal--Terminal Programs 379,040,400 546,055,500 367,130,800
=============== ================ ===============
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Subtotal--flight service programs 32,514,400 33,143,300 53,757,300
=============== ================ ===============
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Subtotal--landing and navigational aids 30,061,800 86,246,800 100,846,800
=============== ================ ===============
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Subtotal--other ATC facilities 40,600,000 47,900,000 47,900,000
=============== ================ ===============
Total Activity 2 843,959,000 1,123,903,000 957,126,900
=============== ================ ===============
Non-ATC Facilities and Equipment: 800,000 1,100,000 1,100,000
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Subtotal--Support Equipment 164,200,000 189,625,000 189,625,000
=============== ================ ===============
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Subtotal--Training Equipment & Facilities 16,400,000 4,700,000 3,900,000
=============== ================ ===============
Total Activity 3 180,600,000 194,325,000 193,525,000
=============== ================ ===============
Mission Support: 28,960,000 27,300,000 27,300,000
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Total Activity 4 376,343,000 244,700,000 231,200,000
=============== ================ ===============
Personnel and Related Expenses: 248,000,000 308,793,900 283,000,000
--------------- ---------------- ---------------
Total Activity 5 248,000,000 308,793,900 283,000,000
=============== ================ ===============
Total 2,122,133,000 2,319,000,000 2,200,000,000
Engineering, Development, Test and Evaluation
The Committee recommends $535,148,100 for engineering, development,
test and evaluation, an increase of $61,917,100 (13.1 percent) above the
fiscal year 1999 enacted level. Adjustments from the budget request are
explained below.
Advanced technology development and prototyping. --Within the funds
provided, the Committee expects FAA to continue evaluation of the phased
array runway incursion radar at Norfolk International Airport. The
Committee understands that FAA also intends to finance the continued
evaluation of the pulse x-band radar in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Air
traffic controllers in both locations support the continued use of these
radar systems until the agency makes a production decision on further
runway incursion technology.
Safe flight 21. --This program was funded in the F&E appropriation
in fiscal year 1999. Although the President's budget requested a
transfer to the research budget next year, the Committee believes the
program is more appropriately maintained in the F&E budget. The
recommendation fully funds the program at the requested level of
$16,000,000.
En route automation. --FAA's budget request includes $10,100,000 for
a new start project titled ``Eunomia'', which is designed to replace
certain en route computer systems such as the Direct Access Radar
Channel (DARC) and the Peripheral Adapter Module Replacement Item
(PAMRI). According to the FAA, this project is still in the investment
and analysis stage. Consequently, little is known about the specific
equipment to be procured or the development work required in this
$500,000,000 program. The Committee believes a few more details are
needed before proceeding with such a substantial investment, and looks
forward to receiving that information from the agency over the coming
weeks. Until the program is sufficiently justified, the Committee
believes funding should be deferred. This is without prejudice to the
Eunomia program. If the agency can provide the necessary detail prior to
conference action on this bill, the Committee will consider restoration
of this funding.
Oceanic automation system. --As of March 31, 1999, the oceanic
automation program had over $11,000,000 in fiscal year 1997 and fiscal
year 1998 unobligated balances, and there was an additional balance from
fiscal year 1999. The Committee now understands that the FAA has
recently decided to complete this effort, which is likely to delay the
program further. Although the Committee supports this development, given
the unobligated balance, it appears that a lower level of new funding
will be sufficient for next year. The Committee recommends $5,000,000, a
reduction of $5,000,000 from the budget estimate. The Committee directs
the FAA not to acquire this system through a lease, but to take the more
traditional contracting approach, due to the developmental nature of the
work being performed.
NAS information systems. --The Committee defers this minor new start
project due to lack of justification, a reduction of $500,000 from the
budget estimate. The Committee will reconsider funding when additional
documentation is submitted about the need for the investment.
Free flight phase one. --The Committee recommends $179,625,000 for
free flight phase one, which is 97.2 percent of the $184,800,000
requested. The Committee continues to support this program. The
recommended funding is almost twice the level provided for fiscal year
1999. The reduction of $3,175,000 from the $83,175,000 budgeted for the
user request evaluation tool (URET) is due to budget constraints and the
need to fund other high priority initiatives. Given the size of this
effort, the Committee believes this modest reduction will not slow the
project down materially. The $80,000,000 provided is still a huge
increase over the $5,800,000 provided in fiscal year 1999, and is 96
percent of the amount requested. The reduction of $2,000,000 from the
budget estimate for the surface movement advisor is due to budget
constraints and the need to fund other high priority initiatives. This
is largely a capacity enhancement tool for aircraft on the airport
surface. The Committee is placing a higher priority on aviation safety
programs.
A comparison of the fiscal year 1999 enacted, the President's budget,
and the recommended levels is as follows:
Project Fiscal year 1999 enacted Fiscal year 2000 budget Recommended in the bill
User request evaluation tool (URET) $5,800,000 $83,175,000 $80,000,000
Conflict probe 41,000,000
Center/tracon automation system (CTAS) 3,700,000
Traffic management advisor (TMA)/passive final approach spacing tool (pFAST) 30,500,000 59,825,000 59,825,000
Collaborative decision-making 11,200,000 29,400,000 29,400,000
Surface movement advisor 6,000,000 4,000,000
Free flight phase one integration 6,400,000 6,400,000
-------------------------- ------------------------- --------------------------
In fiscal year 1999, Congress appropriated $92,200,000 for free
flight phase one projects. The Committee is advised that FAA intends to
execute below-threshold reprogrammings totaling $14,800,000 to augment
this appropriation during fiscal year 1999. This includes $8,300,000 in
fiscal year 1999 funding and $6,500,000 in fiscal year 1998 funding.
These funds would be used to raise the appropriation for the passive
final approach spacing tool by 27.9 percent and provide $2,396,000 for
integration costs when none were appropriated. The Committee believes
this violates the spirit of current reprogramming rules, particularly in
the use of prior year funding. The guidelines for Congressional
notification should apply to all reprogrammed sources planned during the
year without regard to the year of appropriation. Further, the
department is to interpret ``items of Congressional interest'' as those
programs or projects mentioned in explanatory paragraphs of reports
accompanying DOT and Related Agencies Appropriations Act.
Terminal automation (STARS). --In total, the bill includes
$158,900,000 for the Standard terminal automation replacement system
(STARS) program, all for further development. The Committee directs that
the additional $100,000,000 in development funding be used to execute
the new strategy employing ARTS color displays and the STARS early
development capability (EDC) in El Paso, Texas and Syracuse, New York.
Funds remaining after fully funding these efforts shall be used for
other development and associated activities for the STARS program. The
budget proposed $195,240,000 ($58,900,000 in development and
$136,340,000 for procurement of 51 systems). Due to severe problems in
requirements definition and software development, the FAA recently
announced a restructuring of this program, including cost growth of
approximately 50 percent, from $940,000,000 to $1,381,000,000. The
agency conceded that the STARS system will not be ready for procurement
next year, and has promised to submit revised estimates for next year's
development program. At this time, however, the agency has not submitted
these estimates for Congressional review. The Committee believes it
would not be fiscally responsible to provide $136,340,000 for
requirements which are clearly no longer valid, in the absence of
detailed and verified substitute requirements. Therefore, the Committee
defers a portion of these funds until the appropriate justification is
submitted and reviewed.
Local area augmentation system (LAAS). --The President's budget
requested $4,000,000 to initiate phase two, full-scale development of a
category III local area augmentation system (LAAS). This
``government-industry partnership'' was initiated at Congressional
direction in fiscal year 1997 with a government investment of $1,000,000
annually. The Committee is concerned about the cost increase, the
unclear industry share, and the unusual nature of the financial
instruments to execute this project. Given these concerns, the Committee
recommends $2,000,000 for this program.
Wide area augmentation system (WAAS). --The Committee recommendation
freezes funding for this program at the fiscal year 1999 enacted level
due to the uncertain state of the program and lack of justification. In
July 1997, the Committee encouraged FAA to look carefully at the cost
and capability tradeoffs between WAAS and various other systems. In
1998, the Committee expressed serious reservation about the
cost-effectiveness of the overall WAAS program, and suggested the FAA
develop a comprehensive alternatives analysis for navigation and landing
aids programs. Although this work was begun last year, the FAA is still
working on the analysis, and it is unclear when this important
justification material will be delivered to Congress for review. The
Committee has little new information this year on which to base
investment decisions except the 14 month schedule slip in phase one
announced in January 1999. Until the agency can provide the necessary
justification material, the Committee believes a slower pace for phase
two is required. Likewise, the Committtee recommendation defers
$17,000,000 funding for the GPS aeronautical band program for the same
reason.
Procurement of Air Traffic Control Facilities and Equipment
The bill includes $957,126,900 for the procurement of air traffic
control facilities and equipment, an increase of $113,167,900 (13.4
percent) above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level.
En route automation. --The Committee understands that program
savings from contract execution of the host and oceanic computer system
replacement (HOCSR) program indicate less funding is needed in fiscal
year 2000 than requested. The Committee recommends $196,055,000, a
reduction of $2,000,000 from the budget estimate.
Weather and radar processor (WARP). --The Committee recommends
$15,000,000, an increase of $2,128,000 above the budget estimate.
According to the FAA, the additional funds are required due to budget
re-estimates. The Committee continues to believe this is an important
modernization program which potential to improve aviation safety.
ARTCC building improvements. --Funding of $39,400,000 is recommended
for ARTCC building improvements, a decrease of $14,600,000 from the
budget estimate. Two reductions were made. First, the Committee
recommends $34,000,000 for ARTCC projects, a reduction of $5,000,000
from the budget request. Due to the large unobligated balance of prior
year funding from fiscal years 1998 and 1999, the Committee believes
this program can be sustained with less new funding in fiscal year 2000.
For example, as of March 31, 1999, there is an unobligated balance of
approximately $10,700,000 from fiscal year 1998 funding. Second, the
Committee recommends no funding to continue the Honolulu combined en
route approach control (CERAP) project. While the Congress has funded
this program over the years, the current estimates to complete the
project now show significant cost growth. Facility size requirements
have increased by 15,000 square feet; construction bids exceeded the
government cost estimates; ATC electronic and telecommunications
equipment requirements have increased; and air traffic requirements for
the number of controller consoles have increased. Total project costs
are now estimated at $57,100,000. Given these cost problems, the
Committee believes the project should either be rescoped to fit the
original budget or terminated. The deferral of these funds results in a
reduction of $9,600,000 from the budget estimate.
Weather observation equipment plan .--The Committee remains
concerned about the future of automated observation and reporting of
aviation weather information to pilots. The FAA and National Weather
Service ended their joint program for procurement of new weather
observing and reporting systems in fiscal year 1998, yet the FAA has not
defined a new program to address these critical requirements. Since the
end of that program, existing and new requirements for such systems have
gone unmet. Given the importance of timely and accurate weather
information to preserving and improving aviation safety, the Committee
directs FAA to develop a detailed plan for procuring, commissioning, and
maintaining new, current generation weather observation and reporting
systems. The plan should emphasize development of a cost effective
program which uses commercial off the shelf equipment.
ATC beacon interrogator (ATCBI) replacement. --The Committee
recommendation includes $36,806,600, a reduction of $8,593,400 for this
new start acquisition project. Funding of $14,800,000 was enacted for
this project in fiscal year 1999. The reduction is due to budget
constraints and the need to provide funding for other high priority
project.
Terminal automation (STARS). --The Committee believes the budget
request of $136,340,000 to procure 51 STARS systems is premature due to
development problems. The recommended bill would defer procurement
funds, but provide a portion of those funds ($100,000,000) under
engineering development to execute the new strategy employing ARTS color
displays and the STARS early development capability (EDC) in El Paso,
Texas and Syracuse, New York and for additional development work, as
discussed earlier in this report.
Terminal air traffic control facilities replacement. --The Committee
recommends $64,346,000 for this program, a reduction of $11,654,000 from
the budget estimate. Changes to the budget estimate are as follows:
Location Change to request
Newark, NJ -$2,200,000
North Las Vegas, NV -2,354,000
Boston tracon, MA -17,600,000
Phoenix, AZ +5,000,000
Richmond, VA +3,500,000
Corpus Christi, TX +2,000,000
--------------------
Net adjustment to budget estimate -11,654,000
Newark. --Due to delays in award of the construction contract, there
is an unobligated balance of approximately $23,500,000 in this program
from fiscal year 1998 funds. Due to the delay, the Committee believes
there is ample funding to sustain this project throughout fiscal year
2000, and for this reason defers the additional $2,200,000 requested for
this project.
North Las Vegas. --Due to delays in award of the construction
contract, there is an unobligated balance of approximately $6,400,000 in
fiscal year 1998 funding. These funds will not be obligated until
October 1999. The Committee believes there is ample funding to sustain
this project throughout fiscal year 2000, and for this reason defers the
additional $2,354,000 requested for this project.
Boston Tracon relocation. --FAA has submitted little justification
on the benefits of this $30,000,000 project. The Committee recommends
deferral of these funds until stronger justification has been submitted
and reviewed, a reduction of $17,600,000 from the budget estimate.
Phoenix. --Funding of $5,000,000 has been added for a replacement
tower and tracon at Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport in Arizona.
Richmond. --Funding of $3,500,000 has been added for a replacement
tower at Richmond International Airport, Virginia.
Corpus Christi. --Funding of $2,000,000 has been added for a
replacement tower at Corpus Christi International Airport, Texas.
Control tower/tracon facilities improvement. --The Committee
recommendation provides $27,082,500, an increase of $5,099,800 above the
budget estimate. Of the funds provided, $2,500,000 is only for
establishment of a final approach sector for runway 12 at Dulles
International Airport in Virginia. The Dulles Tracon is in need of an
additional operating position to provide air traffic services to runway
12. This service is currently provided as additional duties by another
controller; however, the current rate of air traffic growth makes
continuation of this situation untenable. In addition, $2,600,000 is for
the ATCT/tracon cable loop relocation activity at St. Louis Lambert
International Airport.
NAS infrastructure management system (NIMS) .--Over the past year,
the NAS infrastructure management system (NIMS) program has been
restructured several times due to cost overruns and other problems. The
contract was terminated last December and FAA decided to conduct the
remaining work in-house. However, the program has continued to suffer
delay and confusion within the agency. The recommendation allows
$1,539,500 for further study by the FAA on how to meet NIMS
requirements, a reduction of $7,360,500 below the budget estimate.
Airport surveillance radar (ASR 9) .--The recommendation includes
additional funding of $2,200,000 to relocate the existing ASR 9 at St.
Louis Lambert International Airport, Missouri.
Airport surface detection equipment. --The Committee recommends
$9,400,000, an increase of $7,000,000 above the budget estimate. The
increase is specifically for acquisition of low-cost airport surface
detection equipment (ASDE) systems, to be procured through competitive
solicitation.
Automated movement area safety system (AMASS). --Due to slippage and
delay in this program, there is a shortfall of $3,900,000 to finish
development and meet FAA's current operational readiness date of August
2000. The Committee continues to believe that the AMASS system will
provide important safety benefits, especially given the alarming rise in
the number of runway incursions. The Committee does not believe that
further delay is in the best interest of aviation safety. The Committee
recommends $15,600,000, an increase of $3,900,000.
Terminal digital radar (ASR 11). --The budget request includes
$136,070,000 for acquisition of 24 airport surveillance radar 11 (ASR
11) systems and associated costs. This digital radar is currently under
development and acquisition by the Department of Defense for their needs
and for the FAA. The timing of the acquisition is closely aligned with
the schedule for the digital computer system STARS. Due to the
uncertainty and significant delay in the STARS schedule, it is clear
that the ASR 11 schedule can be slowed down as well. The recommendation
provides $90,000,000, a reduction of $46,070,000 from the budget
estimate, but a large increase over the $27,800,000 planned for fiscal
year 1999.
DoD ATC facilities transfer. --The Committee recommends $3,900,000
for this program, an increase of $2,900,000 above the budget estimate.
The recommended funding is needed to maintain effective air traffic
control service at several military facilities across the country.
According to FAA documents, the budgeted funds are insufficient for this
program in fiscal year 2000 and would result in serious impact on air
traffic management in certain geographic areas. Of the total, $1,300,000
is for operation of the Fort Sill Army radar approach control at the
Henry Post Airfield, Lawton, Oklahoma. The additional funds will also
maintain air traffic service and provide transition funding for Marine
Corps Air Station El Toro, California; McClellan Air Force Base; and
Naval Facility Skaggs Island.
DBRITE. --The Committee recommends $1,400,000 for digital bright
radar indicator tower equipment (DBRITE), to fund installation of
digital radar displays at the following locations: Gainesville Regional
Airport, Florida; Sonoma County Airport, California; and Livermore
Municipal Airport/Buchanan Field Airports, California.
Flight service automation system (FSAS) operational and
supportability implementation system (OASIS). --The Committee recommends
$42,100,000 for the OASIS program, an increase of $20,614,000 above the
budget estimate. According to the FAA, the OASIS system was originally
designed with inadequate regard for human factors requirements.
Belatedly recognizing those requirements, the FAA has determined that
cost increases will be necessary to address them, much like the STARS
situation. Unlike STARS, however, the FAA has made no commitment to
include the necessary funding in the budget request. The Committee
believes this replacement for outmoded flight service station computer
systems has gone on far too long, and further delays are not acceptable.
The Committee recommendation fully funds the FAA estimated shortfall.
Instrument landing systems establishment. --The Committee recommends
$20,000,000, to be distributed as follows:
Location Amount
Items included in President's budget $8,200,000
Baton Rouge, LA 1,362,000
Louisville, KY 3,500,000
St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 3,500,000
Dulles International, VA 3,438,000
-------------
St. Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport .--Of the funds
provided, $3,500,000 shall be to acquire and install a category I
instrument landing system (ILS) for runway 35R and for upgrading the
current category I ILS on runway 17L to category II status at the St.
Petersburg-Clearwater International Airport in Florida.
Dulles International Airport .--Of the funds provided, $3,438,000
shall be to install and commission a category III ILS for runway 19L at
Dulles International Airport in Virginia.
Low level windshear alert system (LLWAS). --The Committee recommends
$4,200,000 for the low-level windshear alert system (LLWAS), which
provides important safety benefits for civil aviation. The budget
request of $2,200,000 would result in a shortfall and schedule delays
for installation of this system at the following high volume airports:
Atlanta, Chicago O'Hare, Dallas-Fort Worth, Denver, New Orleans, New
York LaGuardia, Orlando, St. Louis, and Tampa. The Committee believes it
is important that this important safety equipment not be further
delayed.
Runway visual range (RVR). --The Committee recommends $6,300,000,
including $4,000,000 for continued acquisition of a next generation
runway visual range system. FAA's fiscal year 2000 budget would
terminate this project in the middle of the acquisition and close down
the production line in December 1999, although the agency has plans to
restart the program one year later. The Committee believes it would not
be a good business decision to close down the line this year, only to
pay additional costs to restart it next year. In addition, the
recommendation includes $300,000 to complete installation of RVR
equipment at Dulles International Airport. Although most of the
equipment to support the RVR has been in place for two years, the
project has gone uncompleted because FAA has not budgeted for a cable to
tie the elements together. This final installation work is essential for
reduced departure minima for that runway. The budget request included
$2,000,000 for the RVR program.
Approach lighting system improvement program (ALSIP). --The
recommendation of $7,700,000 includes an additional $5,000,000 for
acquisition of additional approach lighting sequencing flasher-4 (ALSF
4) equipment.
Precision approach path indicators (PAPI). --The Committee
recommends $3,500,000 for precision approach path indicators (PAPI),
including $2,500,000 for acquisition of additional systems, the same
amount as enacted for fiscal year 1999.
Distance measuring equipment (DME). --The Committee recommends
$4,200,000 for distance measuring equipment (DME), including $3,000,000
for acquisition of additional systems.
Transponder landing systems (TLS). --The recommendation includes
$3,000,000 for further acquisition of transponder landing systems. This
is the same level as enacted for fiscal year 1999.
The Committee directs the Federal Aviation Administration to proceed
immediately to install these systems, and is further directed to use the
existing TLS system located in Watertown, WI, for it's in-service review
validation and testing program, and to immediately develop protocols and
approach procedures to be used by commercial and general aviation
aircraft at TLS equipped airports.
GPS aeronautical band. --The Committee recommends deferring FAA
funding for development of additional frequencies for civil use of the
global positioning system (GPS) due to uncertainties over the cost
effectiveness of phases beyond phase one, and considering the current
delay in reaching even the first phase. The Committee is not prejudicial
to this project, but believes that these serious questions should be
cleared up and experience gained from the phase one system prior to
making such a huge investment in later phases. This results in a
reduction of $17,000,000 from the budget estimate.
Terminal doppler weather radar (TDWR). --The Committee remains
concerned that FAA has not installed a TDWR system or otherwise provided
adequate windshear protection for the New York City metropolitan area.
The record of decision to site a TDWR at the former Brooklyn Coast Guard
Air Station was issued earlier this year, and FAA officials testified
before the Subcommittee that the system would be commissioned by the end
of the year. However, the Committee understands that FAA has done little
to move this project forward since approval of the record of decision.
The Committee has watched year after year of delay go by in this
program, and insists that FAA adhere to the current commitment to have
this long-awaited system operational by the end of this year.
Procurement of Non-ATC Facilities and Equipment
The Committee recommends $193,525,000 for the acquisition of non-air
traffic control facilities and equipment, an increase of $12,925,000
(7.2 percent) above the level enacted for fiscal year 1999. The
Committee recommends a reduction of $800,000. The reduction would defer
funds under ``NAS training facilities'' for refurbishment of classroom
and simulation facilities due to low priority and budget constraints.
Mission Support
The recommendation provides $231,200,000 for mission support
activities. Funding of $376,343,000 was provided in fiscal year 1999,
including $147,133,000 in funding for Year 2000 compliance issues.
Adjustments to the budget estimate are explained below.
Permanent change of station moves. --As of March 31, 1999, this
project had approximately $5,300,000 in unobligated funding from the
fiscal year 1997 and 1998 appropriations. Some of this resulted from
slippage in the contract tower program due to suspension of operations
caused by a lawsuit filed by the air traffic controllers union. Given
the plan to obligate most of these funds in fiscal year 2000, it is
apparent that the additional funding in the fiscal year 2000 budget can
be deferred. This results in a reduction to the budget estimate of
$3,200,000.
FAA corporate systems architecture. --Budgeted funds include
$170,000 to support the chief scientist and for ``special projects as
required'' and $180,000 to ``support NAS modernization, including FFP1
and apply evolutionary spiral process, enterprise architecture planning,
and rapid application development''. It is unclear to the Committee what
eventual product will come from this vaguely-worded effort. The
recommendation would fund this project at the fiscal year 1999 enacted
level, a reduction of $1,500,000 below the budget estimate.
Technical services support contract (TSSC). --In an ongoing audit,
the OIG is finding serious cost control and contract administration
problems in this cost plus fixed fee contract. The Committee
recommendation would provide $40,000,000, which compares to $47,550,000
enacted in fiscal year 1999 and $48,800,000 in the President's budget.
Center for advanced aviation systems development (CAASD). --The
Committee recommends the $63,400,000 requested for the center for
advanced aviation systems development (CAASD) at Mitre Corporation, an
increase of 11.2 percent above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level.
According to the FAA, this funding level will support approximately 315
members of the technical staff (MTS). Consistent with this information,
the limitation in the bill on staffing is set at the level of 320 MTS.
Last year, the Committee took note of CAASD's assistance in the
financial planning area, and encouraged the organization to continue and
expand this work, especially in long-range planning and
conceptualization for the operations budget. To date, the Committee has
seen little result from this direction. Mitre is encouraged to use a
portion of the increase in this bill to conduct additional work in this
important area.
Personnel and Related Expenses
The recommendation provides $283,000,000, an increase of 14 percent
above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level versus the 24.5 percent
increase requested. This results in a reduction from the budget estimate
of $25,793,900. The Committee believes a greater increase is not
justified.
RESEARCH, ENGINEERING, AND DEVELOPMENT
(Airport And Airway Trust Fund)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $150,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 173,000,000
Recommended in the bill 173,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +23,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000
This appropriation provides funding for long-term research,
engineering and development programs to improve the air traffic control
system and to increase its safety and capacity to meet air traffic
demands of the future, as authorized by the Airport and Airway
Improvement Act and the Federal Aviation Act. The appropriation also
finances the research, engineering and development needed to establish
or modify federal air regulations.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee recommends $173,000,000, an increase of $23,000,000
(15.3 percent) above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level and the same as
the President's budget request.
While still the safest airway system in the world, aviation accidents
in this country in 1994 and 1996 highlight the need for more rapid
implementation of advanced safety technologies, especially those related
to forecasting and detection of hazardous weather conditions such as
windshear, safety monitoring and oversight technologies, and aircraft
technologies. The high percentage of accidents and incidents due to
human error, deicing, and other hazardous weather problems call for
sustained, high priority research programs to address these issues. In
some cases, these priorities have necessitated reductions in other
research programs.
A table showing the fiscal year 1999 enacted level, the fiscal year
2000 budget estimate, and the Committee recommendation follows:
RESEARCH, ENGINEERING, AND DEVELOPMENT
[Fiscal year 2000]
Program Fiscal year--
1999 enacted 2000 estimate Recommended in the bill
xlSystem Development and Infrastructure: $15,784,000 $17,269,000 $16,280,000
Capacity and Air Traffic Management Technology 16,000,000
xlWeather: 18,684,000 15,300,000 20,950,000
xlAircraft Safety Technology: 34,886,000 39,639,000 44,639,000
xlSystem Security Technology: 51,690,000 53,218,000 58,400,000
xlHuman Factors & Aviation Medicine: 25,065,000 26,207,000 27,829,000
Environment and Energy 2,891,000 3,481,000 3,481,000
Innovative/Cooperative Research 1,000,000 1,421,000 1,421,000
--------------- --------------- --------------------------
Total appropriation 150,000,000 172,535,000 173,000,000
System Development and Infrastructure
The recommended level is $16,280,000 for system development and
infrastructure, an increase of $496,000 (3.1 percent) above the fiscal
year 1999 enacted level.
System planning and resource management. --The recommendation
provides $1,164,000, the same as the fiscal year 1999 enacted level.
This results in a reduction of $130,000 below the budget estimate.
Technical laboratory facility. --The recommendation allocates
$10,216,000, which is $486,000 (5 percent) above the fiscal year 1999
enacted level but $859,000 below the budget estimate. The reduction
holds costs to a 5 percent increase instead of the 13.8 percent increase
requested, and is necessary to fund higher priority activities in
weather, safety and human factors research.
Capacity and Air Traffic Management Technology
The Committee recommends no funding for this budget activity. The
sole project proposed under this heading is transferred to the F&E
appropriation, where it was funded in fiscal year 1999.
Weather
The Committee recommends $20,950,000 to address the effects of
hazardous weather on aviation, an increase of $2,266,000 (12.1 percent)
above the level enacted for fiscal year 1999 and $5,650,000 above the
budget estimate. Within the funds provided, $3,000,000 is to continue
development of Project Socrates. This is the same level provided for
fiscal year 1999. Funding of $1,000,000 is included to continue
activities of the Center for Wind, Ice and Fog at Mount Washington
Observatory in New Hampshire under this program. In addition, funding of
$12,000,000 is to be allocated to the National Laboratory Program. The
Committee continues to strongly support this work, which is coordinated
by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and performed
jointly by several universities, federal laboratories, and non-profit
organizations prominent in the field of weather research.
Aircraft Safety Technology
The Committee recommends $44,639,000 for aircraft safety technology,
$5,000,000 above the budget estimate and $9,753,000 above the level
provided last year.
Flight safety/atmospheric hazards research. --In fiscal year 1999
appropriations action, Congress directed that FAA use $800,000 for
wildlife hazard mitigation purposes. FAA's current plan is to use
$200,000 for wildlife hazard mitigation and use the remaining $600,000
for other purposes. Wildlife strikes on aircraft are a growing threat to
aviation safety which deserves much greater attention by regulators,
airlines and airport operators. Since 1995, seventy-four people have
been killed in collisions worldwide between aircraft and birds and four
large aircraft have been destroyed. The FAA has estimated that bird and
wildlife strikes cost the U.S. aviation industry more than 500,000 hours
of downtime and $327,000,000 in aircraft damage and related costs. Given
the magnitude of this problem, the Committee is perplexed that the
agency is spending only a fourth of the funding that Congress provided
in this area. The Committee directs FAA to utilize $800,000 of fiscal
year 1999 funding to address wildlife hazard mitigation issues,
reiterating last year's Congressional direction.
National Institute for Aviation Research. --Of the amount provided
for ``aging aircraft'', $5,000,000 is to continue and expand research
activities at the National Institute for Aviation Research, a current
FAA Center of Excellence.
System Security Technology
The Committee recommendation provides $58,400,000 for system security
technology, an increase of $5,182,000 above the budget estimate and
$6,710,000 above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level. The increase would
provide additional funding for an expanded effort in explosive detection
systems technology.
Human Factors and Aviation Medicine
The Committee recommendation provides $27,829,000, an increase of
$1,622,000 (6.2 percent) above the budget request and $2,764,000 (11
percent) above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level.
Environment and Energy
The recommendation provides $3,481,000, the same as the budget
estimate and an increase of $590,000 (20.4 percent) above the level
provided last year. This program researches ways to mitigate the impact
of airport noise around the country.
Innovative and Cooperative Research
The recommendation provides $1,421,000, the same as the budget
estimate and an increase of $421,000 (42.1 percent) above the level
provided last year. This program finances the FAA centers of excellence,
the FAA fellows program, and other university-based research of
long-term interest to aviation.
GRANTS-IN-AID FOR AIRPORTS
(Liquidation of Contract Authorization)
(Airport and Airway Trust Fund)
(Liquidation of contract authorization) (Limitation on obligations)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $1,600,000,000 ($1,950,000,000)
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 1,750,000,000 (1,600,000,000)
xlRecommended in the bill 1,867,000,000 (2,250,000,000)
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +267,000,000 (+300,000,000)
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 +117,000,000 (+ 650,000,000)
The bill includes a liquidating cash appropriation of $1,867,000,000
for grants-in-aid for airports, authorized by the Airport and Airway
Improvement Act of 1982, as amended. This funding provides for
liquidation of obligations incurred pursuant to contract authority and
annual limitations on obligations for grants-in-aid for airport planning
and development, noise compatibility and planning, the military airport
program, reliever airports, and other authorized activities. This is
$117,000,000 above the level requested in the President's budget, and is
necessary to support the $650,000,000 in additional obligation authority
supported by this bill.
Limitation on Obligations
The bill includes a limitation on obligations of $2,250,000,000 for
fiscal year 2000. This is $650,000,000 (40.6 percent) above the
President's budget request and $300,000,000 (15.4 percent) above the
fiscal year 1999 level.
Discretionary Grants
Within the obligation level recommended, the Committee directs that
priority be given to grant applications involving further development of
the following airports:
State Airport (project)
Alabama Dothan-Houston County, Haleyville Airport, Huntsville International (phase II expansion; noise mitigation land acquisition), Rankin-Fite Airport, Marion County, Montgomery Regional, Northwest Alabama Regional (security fencing), Pryor Field (runway extension), Russellville, Scottsboro, Shelby County.
California Ft. Irwin Barstow Daggett Heliport, Crescent City, Del Norte County (terminal upgrade), Southern California International Airport (ground access roads), March Air Reserve Base (civilian refueling system), Meadows Field Airport, Bakersfield, San Bernardino International (military airport program), George AFB (military airport program), Stockton Metropolitan, Ells Field, Willits, Mendocino County (runway/taxiway), Los Angeles International.
Florida Miami International (letter of intent), Orlando International (letter of intent), Palm Beach International (noise abatement program), Tallahassee Regional (noise reduction).
Georgia McCollum Field, Cobb County.
Kansas Kingman, Parson's City Airport, Manhattan.
Kentucky Louisville International.
Louisiana Ascension-St. James, Baton Rouge Metropolitan (sound insulation; sound easement; north side airport development), St. James Parish Airport, Houma-Terrebone.
Massachusetts Pittsfield Municipal (runway extension), Harriman-West Municipal (runway reconstruction).
Michigan Sawyer Airport (military airport program), Tulip City.
Mississippi Hawkins Field (runway extension), Jackson International (air cargo apron), John Bell Williams Airport, Hinds County (hangar taxiway).
Missouri Lee's Summit, Kansas City (runway extension).
Montana Anaconda-Deer Lodge Airport.
New York Adirondack Regional (snow removal equipment/infrastructure), Buffalo Niagara International (airport center acquisition/demolition/terminal/apron/access roads), Niagara Falls International Airport (taxiway ``D'').
North Carolina Brunswick County (runway extension), Concord Regional, Duplin County (parallel taxiway), Harnett County (runway extension), Johnston County (taxiway/apron/midfield), Richmond County, Stanly County.
North Dakota Dickinson Municipal.
Ohio Akron-Canton Regional, Dayton International, Pickaway County, Rickenbacker International, Toledo Express (air traffic control tower), Cleveland Hopkins International.
Oregon Newport Municipal (master plan; taxi lane and infrastructure; approach lighting system).
Pennsylvania Erie International, Hazleton Municipal Airport, Lehigh Valley International (noise monitoring system), Wilkes-Barre/Scranton International (terminal expansion).
South Carolina Florence Regional (hangar), St. George Airport (EA/EIS; runway improvement design).
Texas Abilene Regional (terminal/taxiway/emergency response), Ft. Hood, Gray Army Airfield (military airport program), Houston International (letter of intent), Ellington Field (runway; taxiway; related ramp pavement reconstruction).
Tennessee Memphis International (noise monitoring equipment), Millington Municipal (access road); Upper Cumberland Regional (taxiway and related runway/taxiway safety work).
Utah Ogden-Hinckley, Salt Lake City International.
Wisconsin Dane County Regional (primary runway rehabilitation), LaCrosse Municipal (approach lighting system), Richard Bong Airport (perimeter fencing).
Mammoth Lakes Airport, CA. --The Committee urges the FAA to give
priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding for the
extension of the existing runway by at least 1,000 feet, widening of the
runway by at least 50 feet, and for strengthening the runway to meet FAA
standards for group III aircraft. In addition, funding will be necessary
to increase the maneuvering space in the taxiway and ramp areas to
accommodate group III aircraft. The Committee is pleased to note the
previous assistance and encourages the FAA to provide continued
technical assistance to the Mammoth Lakes Airport. Such assistance has
helped the airport identify the upgrades necessary to provide full
commercial jet service.
Akron-Canton Regional Airport, OH. --The Committee urges the FAA to
give priority consideration to requests for discretionary funding for
the safety upgrades and extension of runway 1/19 at Akron-Canton
Regional Airport in Ohio.
Kingman Airport, KS. --The Committee urges the FAA to give priority
consideration to requests for discretionary funding for phase one
upgrades at Kingman Municipal Airport, including land acquisition
reimbursement, runway paving, runway lights, and new navigation aids.
Palm Beach International Airport, FL. --The Committee urges the FAA
to give priority consideration for discretionary funding for noise
abatement projects at the Palm Beach International Airport in Florida.
Leesburg Municipal Airport, VA. --The Committee recognizes that as
air traffic operations in the Washington, D.C., area continue to grow,
regional reliever airports will be called upon to play increased safety
and capacity roles. Therefore, the Committee urges the FAA to consider
the discretionary grant application made by the Leesburg Municipal
Airport to expand the runway safety area.
Ellington Field, Houston, TX. --Last year, the Committee discussed
the pending application of Houston's Ellington Field for readmission to
the Military Airport Program. The Committee is extremely concerned that
this application is still pending, and the FAA has not given any
indication that it intends to move forward with its consideration. This
airport is used by numerous federal agencies including NASA and the
Coast Guard. Unfortunately, the main runway and related pavements at
Ellington are deteriorating, putting NASA flight training activities in
jeopardy. The Committee urges the FAA either to act favorably on
Ellington's application for readmission to MAP, or to commit AIP
discretionary funds to accomplish the main runway, taxiway, and related
ramp pavement reconstruction necessary to assure future use of the
airport by NASA and others.
Baton Rouge Metropolitan Airport, LA. --The Committee urges the FAA
to give priority consideration to discretionary funding for runway,
taxiway, landing and lighting system, and equipment improvements, as
well as ongoing noise mitigation needs, in and around the Baton Rouge
Metropolitan Airport in Louisiana. There are critical runway and taxiway
upgrades that require immediate attention. Additionally, an accelerated
effort to complete ongoing sound insulation and sound easements, begun
in the 1980's, is vital to maintain the integrity of surrounding
neighborhoods.
St. George Airport, SC. --The Committee encourages the FAA to give
priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding for an
environmental assessment and runway improvement design at the St. George
Airport, South Carolina.
Florence Regional Airport, SC. --The Committee urges the FAA to
request discretionary funding for demolition and hangar construction at
the Florence Regional Airport, South Carolina.
Tallahassee Regional Airport, FL. --The Committee urges the FAA to
give priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding for
the Tallahassee, Florida Regional Airport noise reduction plan.
Pryor Field, AL. --The Committee understands that Pryor Field, a
general aviation airport in Decatur, Alabama has submitted an
application to the FAA to fund the extension of its runway in order to
accommodate larger jets. The Committee recognizes the importance of this
runway extension project, especially given the significant increase in
industrial development in the Decatur metropolitan area, and urges the
FAA to give priority consideration to this request for discretionary
funding.
Huntsville International Airport, AL. --The Committee urges the FAA
to give priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding
for noise mitigation projects, particularly the acquisition of noise
impacted property north of runway 18L 36R, at the Huntsville
International Airport, Alabama.
Northwest Alabama Regional Airport, Muscle Shoals, AL. --The
Committee urges the FAA to give priority consideration to a request for
discretionary funding for the placement of security fencing at the
Northwest Alabama Regional Airport in Muscle Shoals, Alabama.
Fort Hood, Gray Army Airfield, TX. --The Committee urges the FAA to
give priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding under
the military airport program for design and construction of a new
joint-use airport facility at Robert Gray Army Airfield of Fort Hood,
Texas.
Harnett County, NC. --The Committee urges the FAA to give priority
consideration to a request for discretionary funding for a runway
extension at Harnett County Airport, Erwin, North Carolina.
Johnston County Airport, NC. --The Committee understands that runway
improvements at Johnston County Airport, North Carolina are needed, and
encourages the FAA to give priority consideration to a request for
discretionary funding for taxiway, apron and midfield area improvements
at the airport.
Toledo Express Airport, OH. --The Committee urges the FAA to give
priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding for
preliminary design and engineering services for a new air traffic
control tower at Toledo Express Airport, Ohio.
Dane County Regional Airport, WI. --The Committee urges the FAA to
give priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding to
rehabilitate the primary runway (runway 18/36) of the Dane County
Regional Airport, Wisconsin. The Committee understands that the existing
runway pavement is deteriorating rapidly and has a pavement condition
index rating below the minimum service level.
Richard Bong Municipal Airport, WI. --The Committee urges the FAA to
give priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding for
perimeter fencing at the Richard Bong Municipal Airport, Wisconsin.
La Crosse Municipal Airport, WI. --The Committee encourages the FAA
to give priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding
for an approach lighting system at La Crosse Municipal Airport,
Wisconsin.
Pittsfield Municipal Airport, MA. --The Committee urges the FAA to
give priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding for
study and design of a runway extension at Pittsfield Municipal Airport,
Massachusetts.
Harriman-West Municipal Airport, MA. --The Committee urges the FAA
to give priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding
for runway reconstruction at the Harriman-West Municipal Airport in
North Adams, Massachusetts
Jackson International Airport, MS. --The Committee encourages the
FAA to give priority consideration to a request for discretionary
funding for final design and construction of the air cargo apron at the
Jackson International Airport, Jackson, Mississippi.
Hawkins Field, MS. --The Committee encourages the FAA to give
priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding for a
runway extension at Hawkins Field, Jackson, Mississippi. The Committee
understands that extending the runway will make it possible for the
airport to accommodate modern commercial jets and improve aviation
access to the Jackson area.
John Bell Williams Airport, MS. --The Committee encourages the FAA
to give priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding
for a hangar and access taxiway construction and other airport
improvements at John Bell Williams Airport in Hinds County, Mississippi.
Abilene Regional Airport, TX. --The Committee is aware of plans for
essential infrastructure improvements to enhance competition, capacity
and safety at the Abilene Regional Airport. Given the economic potential
and immediate needs of this regional facility, the Committee encourages
the FAA to give priority consideration to requests for discretionary
funding that will assist the Abilene Regional Airport with various
capital improvements such as terminal expansion, taxiway extension and
emergency response vehicle procurement.
Crescent City Airport, CA. --The Committee encourages the FAA to
give priority consideration to a request for discretionary funding for
expansion and upgrade of the terminal at Crescent City Municipal
Airport, California.
Ells Field, CA. --The Committee encourages the FAA to give priority
consideration to a request for discretionary funding for runway and
taxiway improvements at Ells Field in Willits, California.
Orlando International Airport, FL. --The Committee encourages the
FAA to give priority consideration to a request for a letter of intent
for a fourth runway for Orlando International Airport, Florida.
Miami International Airport, FL. --The Committee encourages the FAA
to give priority consideration to a request for a letter of intent for a
fourth runway at Miami International Airport, Florida.
MILITARY AIRPORT PROGRAM
The Committee directs FAA to fill any pending opening in the military
airport program by December 1, 1999. The Committee is aware that the FAA
has had one opening which could be filled, but the agency has been very
slow in making the selection. The Committee does not wish to see further
delay in this important program.
LETTERS OF INTENT
The Committee is concerned about allegations made that the FAA
subjects airports which want to obtain a letter of intent (LOI) to an
informal requirement that they either impose a passenger facility charge
(PFC) or commit to imposing one in the near future. The Committee has
been assured both by the Department of Transportation and by the FAA
that, in the view of those agencies, they do not have the legal
authority to make PFCs a requirement for getting an LOI, and that there
is no such requirement. The Committee agrees that neither the department
nor the FAA have the legal authority to require PFCs as a condition to
receiving an LOI. The Committee notes with some concern, however, that
every airport which has an LOI and is eligible to impose a PFC either
has a PFC or just recently received an LOI and is in the process of
imposing a PFC. The Committee finds it hard to accept that this is
simply a coincidence. The Committee urges FAA not merely to take the
correct position on this issue, but to ensure that AIP staff actually
carry out that position.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Safford Airport, Arizona.-- The bill includes a provision allowing
the Secretary to waive terms of a 1956 deed of conveyance by which the
United States conveyed lands to the city of Safford, Arizona for use by
the city for airport purposes, provided that no such waiver may be
granted if it would result in closure of an airport.
Limitation on Secretarial notification process.-- It has been
customary for airport grant awards to be withheld until notification can
be made to affected Members of Congress by the Office of the Secretary
of Transportation (OST). The Committee has no objection to this overall
policy. However, a report of the GAO dated May 18, 1999 indicated that
these notifications are taking an increasing amount of time. In 1996,
notifications took an average of 31 days. By 1998, the average had
increased to 47 days, and some notifications took several months. The
Committee believes this amount of delay is unnecessary, and clearly
counterproductive to the efficient conduct of the AIP program.
Therefore, a provision has been included in the bill which limits the
notification period to fifteen calendar days. After that time period,
the FAA may proceed with grant announcement and award.
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
SUMMARY OF FISCAL YEAR 2000 PROGRAM
The Federal Highway Administration provides financial assistance to
the states to construct and improve roads and highways, enforces federal
standards related to motor carriers and the highway transport of
hazardous materials, and provides technical assistance to other agencies
and organizations involved in road building activities. Title 23 and
other supporting legislation provide authority for the various
activities of the Federal Highway Administration. Funding is provided by
contract authority, with program levels established by annual
limitations on obligations in appropriations Acts.
The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA21) amended
the Budget Enforcement Act to provide two additional discretionary
spending categories, one of which is the highway category. This category
is comprised of all federal-aid highway funding, motor carrier safety
funding, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) highway
safety grant funding and NHTSA highway safety research and development
funding. The highway category obligations are capped at $28,085,150,000
and outlays are capped at $24,574,000,000 in fiscal year 2000. If
appropriations action forces highway obligations or outlays to exceed
these levels, the difference and the resulting outlays are charged to
the non-defense discretionary spending category. If highway account
receipts exceed levels specified in TEA21, automatic adjustments are
made to increase or decrease obligations and outlays for the highway
category accordingly, as is the case in fiscal year 2000.
The Committee's recommendation fully comports to and does not exceed
the levels guaranteed by TEA21. The following table summarizes the
program levels within the Federal Highway Administration for fiscal year
1999 enacted, the fiscal year 2000 budget request and the Committee's
recommendation:
Program Fiscal year-- Recommended in the bill
1999 enacted 2000 request
Federal-aid highways $25,511,000,000 $26,245,000,000 $26,245,000,000
Revenue aligned budget authority (RABA) 1,456,350,000 1,456,350,000
RABA transfer -502,120,000
Adjustment 63,000,000
Exempt obligations 1,424,047,000 1,132,116,000 1,132,116,000
Motor carrier safety grants 100,000,000 105,000,000 105,000,000
Motor carrier safety grants (RABA) 50,000,000
Surface transportation programs 332,000,000
LIMITATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Limitation, fiscal year 1999 ($327,413,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 (350,432,000)
Recommended in the bill (356,380,000)
xlBill compared with:
Limitation, fiscal year 1999 (+28,967,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 (+5,948,000)
This limitation controls spending for the salaries and expenses of
the Federal Highway Administration required to conduct and administer
the federal-aid highways programs and most other federal highway
programs. In the past, this limitation included a number of contract
programs, such as highway research, development and technology; however,
the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA21) created a
separate limitation for transportation research. Accordingly, in fiscal
year 2000, costs related to highway research, development and technology
are included under a separate limitation.
The Committee recommends a limitation of $356,380,000. This amount is
$28,967,000 above amounts provided for fiscal year 1999 and $5,948,000
above the level requested in the budget. The recommendation will support
an FTE level of 2,427 in the non-motor carrier program, the same level
as enacted in fiscal year 1999. For motor carrier operations, the
Committee recommendation includes $70,484,000, an increase of
$17,109,000 over the fiscal year 1999 enacted level. The recommended
level assumes the following adjustments to the budget request:
Undistributed reduction in administrative expenses (non-motor carrier) -$6,000,000
Eliminate funding for the human resources information system -802,000
Eliminate funding for community/federal information partnership program -6,000,000
Eliminate funding for national rural development program support -500,000
Advanced vehicle technology consortia program (Section 5111 of TEA21) +5,000,000
Transportation management planning for the Salt Lake City 2002 Winter Olympic Games (Section 1223 of TEA21) +5,000,000
Additional resources for federal inspectors and other safety-related activities within the office of motor carriers +9,250,000
Undistributed reduction in administrative expenses. --The Committee
recommendation includes a general reduction of $6,000,000 in
administrative expenses and provides FHWA the flexibility to allocate
that reduction among such expenses as ADP, permanent change of station,
travel, transportation and non-mandatory bonuses and incentives.
Overall, the budget represents an 11 percent increase. The Committee
notes that common administrative expenses billed through the TASC
increase by 17 percent, while inflation assumptions for non-pay items is
1.3 percent. A reduction of $6,000,000 is a reduction of only 2 percent
of the budget estimate.
Human resources information system (HRIS). --The Committee has
deleted funding requested in each of the department's operating
administrations for the human resources information system as systems
development is premature. Further discussion of this recommendation can
be found earlier in this report under the appropriation for the office
of the assistant secretary for administration in the office of the
secretary. FHWA's share of HRIS development in fiscal year 2000 is
$802,000.
Community/federal information partnership participation. --No funds
are provided for a new grant program, the community/federal information
partnership participation program, for which the budget request included
$6,000,000. This grant program is not authorized. Moreover, the
Committee believes that organizations such as the American Association
of State Highway and Transportation Officials can assist in the
development of a standardized framework for the use and dissemination of
geo-spatial information related to ground transportation infrastructure
without cost to the Federal Government should state and local
transportation agencies identify such a need.
National rural development program support. --The Committee has
deleted funding requested for the department's share of the national
rural development program (-$500,000). This program is a government-wide
initiative/partnership, led by the Department of Agriculture, and is a
network of rural development leaders and officials committed to the
vitality of rural areas. The Committee has deleted funds for this
activity for several years.
Advanced vehicle consortia program.--The Committee has included
$5,000,000 within funds provided for the FHWA's administrative expenses
for the advanced vehicle consortia program. The budget request had
proposed to provide $20,000,000 for the program to be diverted from
funds provided in TEA21 for the magnetic levitation program. The
department is directed to include with the fiscal year 2001 budget
request a report that: delineates a detailed strategic spending plan
outlining the scope and direction of each of the planned research,
development, demonstration, and deployment projects expected to be
funded as part of the program during the next five years; demonstrates
that the activities to be conducted by the participating consortia will
be coordinated and integrated into a cohesive program; provides
documentation that the projects to be funded do not in any way overlap
with other FTA, FRA, or DOE activities; and demonstrates the financial
participation of other federal departments. The Committee insists that
all development, demonstration and deployment projects funded under this
initiative require at least fifty percent non-federal funds. None of the
funds made available shall be used to advance magnetic levitation
technology.
Transportation management planning for the Salt Lake City 2002
Winter Olympic Games. --The Committee recommendation includes $5,000,000
for transportation management planning for the Salt Lake City 2002
Winter Olympic Games, as authorized by section 1223(c) of TEA21. These
funds shall be available for planning activities and related
transportation infrastructure investments based on the transportation
management plan approved by the Secretary.
Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center contracting. --In response
to an audit requested by the House Committee on Appropriations because
of concerns regarding weaknesses in the award and administration of
contracts at the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, the Inspector
General identified systematic weaknesses in the Center's internal
controls for monitoring interagency agreements and contracts. Recent
fraud convictions have occurred and underscore the need for improved
controls at the Center. The FHWA is therefore directed to identify and
submit specific corrective actions it plans in response to the IG's
recommendations and target dates for completion of these actions to the
House and Senate Committees on Appropriations by December 1, 1999.
Motor carrier. --In 1997, 5,398 people died on America's highways in
truck related accidents, an increase of 4.5 percent in fatalities over
the previous year and the highest fatality level in the current decade.
At the same time, more commercial motor vehicles are driving more miles
on our roadways. Trucking vehicle miles have increased 40 percent over
the last decade. Over 20 percent of these trucks--more than one in every
five--are operating with safety defects so serious that they should be
placed out of service.
Last year, the Committee began reviewing the effectiveness of the
Office of Motor Carriers and Highway Safety (OMCHS). In February, the
Committee held a comprehensive hearing on the subject. The results of
our review and the hearing were disturbing.
A common theme heard throughout testimony before the Committee was
that OMCHS is not doing enough to prevent unsafe operators from
traveling on our highways. For example, in 1997, the IG found that only
2.5 percent of interstate motor carriers were reviewed and 64 percent of
the nation's carriers did not have a safety rating. Yet very little
progress has been made since then to conduct safety ratings on motor
carriers. The number of compliance reviews has fallen by 30 percent
since 1995. The amount of fines collected from unsafe trucking companies
has fallen to the lowest level since 1992. Currently, the average
settlement per enforcement case is $1,600. Without a more effective and
aggressive program to improve truck safety, the General Accounting
Office (GAO) predicts that fatalities could rise as high as 6,000 per
year by 2000.
This growth in trucking fatalities is alarming. It equates to a major
airline accident every two weeks, with about 200 fatalities. In
comparison, other transportation modes have seen a decline in
fatalities.
The rising number of deaths and the poor oversight of the trucking
industry are partially a result of OMCHS's placement within the Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA). FHWA's primary mission is to award over
$25 billion in highway and construction funds to the states, not to
improve highway safety. FHWA is skilled at building and maintaining
roads, but has done a poor job at maintaining an effective and forceful
monitoring program. Eclipsed by an agency of 2,427 FTE and fifty
division offices and several regional resource centers, OMCHS and its
safety mission lack a strong focus, and is subjugated to second-class
status within FHWA. Based on a safety program of education and
enforcement, some personnel within OMCHS have become too close to the
trucking industry, which they are charged with regulating.
Earlier this year, the IG completed an audit of OMCHS' ties to the
trucking industry. The IG found that OMCHS leadership had engaged in a
``strategy * * * devised to solicit the trucking industry and third
party communications to Congress in order to generate opposition to the
OMCHS transfer provision'' contained in Congressional legislation. In
short, OMCHS used the industry it is charged with regulating to solicit
support to defeat a congressional proposal which was designed to improve
trucking safety.
In light of these findings the Committee believes that significant
and fundamental changes are needed at the Office of Motor Carriers and
Highway Safety. Although the department has changed its leadership and
has begun to focus on enforcement actions, more needs to be done. No
improvements to truck safety will occur if the regulators are unable to
maintain an arms length relationship with the industry; if the office
does not more effectively identify and target habitual violators of the
federal safety regulations; if they do not adopt strong enforcement
actions against the minority of carriers that repeatedly violate safety
rules; and if OMCHS does not aggressively sanction the industry for
safety violations. Without these types of changes, fatalities will
continue to rise.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The Committee has provided $70,484,000 for motor carrier safety
operations, which is an increase of $9,250,000 over the amended budget
request and $17,109,000 above the fiscal year 1999 enacted level. Many
of the activities contained in the amended budget request can be
legitimately defined as administrative expenses and have been included
in this account. The following increases were made:
Additional inspectors for compliance reviews $500,000
New staff to decrease the regulatory backlog 250,000
Additional staff for border enforcement activities 816,000
Crash data 4,000,000
Safety systems database 3,000,000
Census information 4,500,000
Critical incident management 2,000,000
Inspectors for compliance reviews. --The Committee has provided
$500,000 for the Office of Motor Carriers and Highway Safety to hire 10
additional inspectors to improve the vitality and vigor of its
compliance program. Between 1995 and 1997, the number of federally
conducted compliance reviews decreased from 5 per month to less than 2
per month. Also, the number of compliance orders and consent orders
issued to problem carriers declined significantly. Although the
Committee is pleased that FHWA has issued a memorandum to its personnel
requiring a more vigorous enforcement and compliance program to promote
motor carrier safety, it is unclear if a more robust program can be
accomplished without additional personnel. The Committee directs FHWA to
adopt a strategy that would ensure all A and B carriers and at least 20
percent of the C carriers are reviewed within six months of being
entered into the Safety Status Measurement System (Safestat). Also, the
Committee expects OMCHS enforcement personnel to conduct at least 8,000
compliance reviews per year on high risk carriers (both trucks and
buses) that have violated the motor carrier safety or hazardous
materials transportation regulations or have been involved in a
reportable crash.
Bus safety. --Between 1993 and 1997, 21 people died in charter bus
accidents. In the past six months, there have been 30 fatalities. The
National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has been reviewing motor
coach safety, including the most recent accident in New Orleans. They
found ``carriers that have repeatedly received conditional or
unsatisfactory ratings in either the vehicle or driver factor of the
compliance review continue to operate, placing school children and other
passengers at risk.'' The NTSB concluded ``that OMCHS needs to increase
its oversight of passenger carrier operations.'' As part of the
increased enforcement effort, the Committee expects OMCHS to complete
more compliance reviews on the motor coach industry and develop a
separate Safestat program to identify problem motor coach carriers.
Regulatory backlog. --To address more effectively the regulatory
backlog facing this office, the Committee has included $250,000 to hire
four additional personnel and to provide ample training for current and
new regulatory staff. Both safety advocates and the trucking industry
have criticized OMCHS for taking too long to issue safety rules. Two
problems frequently cited were the delay in altering the current hours
of service regulations and the eight years it took the agency to
complete a rule on enhanced conspicuity for trailers. The Committee
recognizes the complex nature of the rulemaking process; however, it
believes that the OMCHS can be more timely in the issuance of its rules
with additional staff to develop, write, and analyze proposed rules, and
funding to better train its current regulatory staff.
Border enforcement activities. --The Committee has provided $816,000
to hire additional federal inspectors to man border crossings in
Arizona, California, New Mexico, and Texas. The Inspector General, in a
review of the motor carrier safety program for commercial trucks at the
southern U.S. borders, found that ``with the exception of California,
far too few trucks are being inspected at the U.S.-Mexico border, and
that too few inspected trucks comply with U.S. standards. For example,
in fiscal year 1997, the truck out-of-service rate at border crossings
in Texas was about 50 percent, compared to a U.S. truck out-of-service
rate of about 25 percent, and a Canadian truck out-of-service rate of
about 17 percent.'' To address this problem, the Inspector General
recommended increasing the number of federal inspectors per work shift
for all 28 border crossings during the hours they were open. The
Committee has provided $816,000 to hire additional inspectors for these
crossings. According to FHWA personnel and the Commercial Vehicle Safety
Alliance, it takes between 6 and 9 months to hire and train new
inspectors. The Committee has taken this time lag into account when
developing the funding recommendation for these new inspectors.
To accommodate the additional inspector presence, the Committee has
allocated $10,000,000 from FHWA's border program for border states to
acquire portable scales, computers, and facilities and lease land
necessary to conduct these inspections. These are eligible activities
under the coordinated border infrastructure program.
Crash data. --The Committee has provided $4,000,000 to expand the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA's) fatal
accident reporting system (FARS) to include all truck and bus crashes.
Currently, there are about 150,000 crashes (tow-away, injury, and
fatal); however only 100,000 are reported to the department. Without an
accurate picture, OMCHS has difficulty identifying all high-risk
carriers. At this funding level, FHWA can identify what data to collect
and the impediments to uploading accurate and timely data. Also, FHWA
should reimburse NHTSA for its work to: (1) design and implement an
expanded data system built on FARS; (2) negotiate contracts with the
states to collect this data; (3) hire the necessary contractors to
collect the data; and (4) train the contractors to assure uniform coding
of this new data. The Committee recognizes that additional funds will be
necessary in the future once this system is fully implemented.
Safety systems database. --A total of $3,000,000 has been provided
to establish a comprehensive database containing complete information on
the predominant factors that contribute to large truck crashes.
Information included in this database should enable OMCHS to address
causal factors, preventing crashes in the future. GAO testified that
``the data base would take 2 3 years to complete, at a cost of
$2,000,000 $3,000,000.'' The American Automobile Association testified
about the need for this type of system and stated that the results could
be relevant for 15 years. The Committee urges OMCHS to include NHTSA,
the trucking industry, and the safety community in developing this
proposal.
Census information. --The Committee has provided $4,500,000 to
improve census data in the Safestat system. Census data includes
information on the number of trucks a company operates and the vehicle
miles traveled. In the majority of states, interstate carriers are
required to file census data with OMCHS once, when they initially go
into business. After that, census data is only updated when OMCHS or the
state conducts compliance reviews at the carriers' facilities. According
to GAO, Safestat's ability to target high-risk carriers is limited by
out-of-date census data. The Committee understands that this is a
two-year program that is needed only until the unified carrier register
becomes operational in 2001.
Critical incident management. --A total of $2,000,000 has been
allocated for critical incident management activities, which could
include developing post-crash investigation training and working with
states to collect driver citation data so that companies hiring problem
drivers can be targeted for safety reviews.
School transportation study. --Within the funds allocated to OMCHS,
$200,000 shall be for the school transportation safety study required by
section 4030 of TEA21.
Operation respond. --Within the funds made available, $375,000 shall
be available for Operation Respond.
Loading weight. --There is no federal requirement for shippers to
determine or estimate the weight of a load and record this weight on its
``straight bill of lading''. The argument has been made that without
this basic and necessary weight information, the truck driver cannot
determine whether the load is secured properly and/or whether his
planned route is appropriate. As such, the department should examine
whether regulations should require shippers to identify the exact weight
or approximate load weights on all of their shipping papers and bills of
lading.
Bill language. --A general provision (sec. 335) is included in the
bill that prohibits funds in this Act from being used to carry out the
functions and operations of the Office of Motor Carriers and Highway
Safety within the Federal Highway Administration. Numerous hearings have
been held on the vigor and professionalism of OMCHS. The Inspector
General, the Chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board,
trucking representatives, the enforcement community, and safety
advocates all believe that OMCHS should be moved from the Federal
Highway Administration to a Motor Carrier Safety Administration or to
NHTSA. Although there is not agreement on the best structure to improve
commercial motor vehicle and motor coach safety, it clearly needs to be
moved from FHWA, whose primary mission is to invest in highway and
bridge improvements. Safety cannot have the necessary focus under FHWA.
The Committee cannot continue recommending funds for such an ineffective
program, and hopes that the appropriate authorizing committees, which
also have conducted several hearings on motor carrier safety, will
report legislation expeditiously that transfers OMCHS from FHWA. It is
the desire of this Committee that inclusion of this provision should
expedite such legislation before the end of this current legislative
session.
LIMITATION ON TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH
Limitation, fiscal year 1999\1\ (--)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (--)
Recommended in the bill ($422,450,000)
xlBill compared with:
Limitation, fiscal year 1999 (+422,450,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 (+422,450,000)
\1\Resources available in fiscal year 1999 and requested in fiscal year 2000 are assumed within the federal-aid obligation limitation.
This limitation controls spending for the transportation research and
technology contract programs of the Federal Highway Administration. This
limitation includes a number of contract programs including intelligent
transportation systems, surface transportation research, technology
deployment, training and education, and university transportation
research. In the past, funding under this limitation was provided in
part from the limitation on general operating expenses and from contract
authority provided in permanent law. The Committee recommends a
limitation of $422,450,000. This is the same level as is authorized by
TEA21, and an increase of $18,800,000 over comparable fiscal year 1999
enacted levels.
TEA21 authorizes $422,450,000 in fiscal year 2000 for the following
transportation research programs:
Surface transportation research $97,000,000
Technology deployment program 40,000,000
Training and education 16,000,000
Bureau of transportation statistics 31,000,000
ITS standards, research, operational tests, and development 98,200,000
ITS deployment 113,000,000
University transportation research 27,250,000
422,450,000
Within the funds provided for surface transportation research, the
accompanying bill provides funding for the following activities in the
specified amounts, consistent with the provisions of TEA21:
Technology assessment and deployment $14,000,000
Long term pavement performance 10,000,000
International outreach program 500,000
Research and technology support 7,500,000
Highway research and development 65,000,000
97,000,000
Within the funds provided for highway research and development, the
Committee recommends that $65,000,000 be allocated for the following
activities in the specified amounts:
Highway research and development:
$14,200,000
12,500,000
14,500,000
7,000,000
4,700,000
4,000,000
6,400,000
900,000
800,000
65,000,000
Safety. --The safety research and technology program develops
engineering practices, analysis tools, equipment, roadside hardware, and
safety promotion and public information that will significantly
contribute to the reduction of highway fatalities and injuries. The
Committee recommends $14,200,000 for safety research and development
activities, an increase of $2,200,000 over the budget request. FHWA
shall implement a comprehensive research and technology program that
will ensure that safety research and development activities receive at
least the same amount of funds that were provided in fiscal year 1999.
The Committee is pleased with the progress made since last year to
advance technology combining the use of UV lights and flourescent
materials to improve night time visibility (e.g., to help delineate lane
markings). Because of the substantial benefits that may be realized as a
result of this technology, FHWA should ensure that this initiative is
pursued as expeditiously as possible.
The Committee encourages FHWA and the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration to work diligently to address the traffic safety issue of
speeding--especially in rural communities where speed limits are higher
than in urban areas. In recent years, close to half of the Nation's
traffic fatalities occurred in rural areas. In addition, about 55
percent of all work zone fatalities occur in rural areas. One promising
technology to address the challenge of increased speeds is variable
speed limit (VSL) systems, which automatically adjust the speed limit to
weather and/or traffic conditions. FHWA, working in cooperation with
NHTSA, shall conduct a focused review of VSL enforcement, including
consideration of legal, liability, and social issues; prepare guidelines
for the type of evidence required for a VSL system to be enforceable and
upheld in court; develop model statute language that would ensure
successful implementation of the technology; and conduct a test to
evaluate a VSL system. The results of this activity shall be contained
in a report to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations.
Pavements research. --The pavement research and technology program
identifies engineering practices, analytic tools, equipment, roadside
hardware, and safety promotion and public information that will
significantly contribute to the reduction of highway fatalities and
injuries. For fiscal year 2000, the Committee recommends $12,500,000.
The FHWA is encouraged to support research in silica fume technology,
next generation pavement design, hot climate asphalt technology, and
geosynthetic pavement systems.
Structures. --The structures research and technology program
develops technologies, advanced materials and methods to efficiently
maintain and renew the aging transportation infrastructure, improve
existing infrastructure performance, and enable efficient infrastructure
response and quick recovery after major disasters. For fiscal year 2000,
the Committee recommends $14,500,000. The FHWA is encouraged to support
research into advanced wood deposits and lithium technology to mitigate
the damage from alkali silica reaction.
Environment research. --The environment research and technology
program develops improved tools for assessing highway impacts on the
environment; techniques for the avoidance, detection, and mitigation of
those impacts and for enhancement of the environment; and expertise on
environmental concerns within FHWA and state and local transportation
agencies. For fiscal year 2000, the Committee recommends $7,000,000 for
research on environmental issues affecting highway operations and
construction, an increase of $1,000,000 over the budget request. The
additional funds shall be available to support research to examine the
levels and types of fine particulate matter produced by highway sources,
and to develop improved tools to predict truck travel and resulting
emissions of nitrous oxides (NO X). These studies will help assist state
and local transportation agencies in demonstrating conformity with air
quality plans and in attaining federal air quality standards. Further,
within the funds provided for highway research and development, the
department shall make available $100,000 for continuation of the PM 10
study.
Policy research. --The policy research and technology program
supports FHWA policy analysis and development, strategic planning, and
technology development through research in data collection, management
and dissemination; highway financing, investment analysis, and
performance measurement; and enhancement of highway program
contributions to economic productivity, efficiency, and other national
goals. The Committee recommends $4,700,000 for policy research in fiscal
year 2000. The Committee notes that substantial concerns have been
raised regarding the department's ongoing truck size and weight study.
FHWA's management should ensure that future policy-oriented studies are
based on more realistic assumptions and are completed in a timely
manner. The Committee maintains that the authorization caps and
legislated set-asides in TEA21 do not allow for the initiation of a new
research funding category to conduct freight research. Furthermore,
research to better understand freight movements should be conducted with
private sector funds, rather than public funds as requested by the
department. Consequently, the Committee does not recommend any funds for
freight research from any surface transportation research subaccount.
Planning. --The planning research and technology program advances
cost effective methods to evaluate transportation strategies and
investments; develops and disseminates improved planning methods;
develops more effective planning and data collection techniques for
intermodal passenger and freight planning and programming; improves
financial planning tools for use in developing transportation plans and
programs; evaluates the characteristics of the National Highway System;
and develops improved analytical tools to support metropolitan and
statewide planning and for information and data sharing with state and
local governments. The Committee recommendation includes $4,000,000 for
planning research. Funds for real estate services are included within
the planning subaccount. No funds are provided in any surface
transportation subaccount for research into sustainability as contract
funds specified in section 1221 of TEA21 can be used to support such
research.
Motor carrier research. --The Committee has provided $6,400,000 for
motor carrier research, which is the same level as requested. The
Executive Director of FHWA is directed to improve the budget
justification for this research area. Future budget requests should
delineate the specific projects that will be funded and the exact amount
for each project, similar to the format used by the Federal Railroad
Administration's next generation high-speed rail program. As part of
this improved format, FHWA should also include an analysis of the
possible impacts of the proposed research on motor carrier safety and
crash reduction.
Advanced research. --The advanced research program addresses
longer-term, higher-risk research that shows potential benefits for
improving the durability, efficiency, environmental impact,
productivity, and safety of highway systems. The Committee provides
$900,000 for advanced research.
Highway operations. --The highway operations research program is
designed to develop, deliver and deploy advanced technologies and
administrative methods to provide pavement and bridge durability, and to
reduce construction and maintenance-related user delays. The Committee
recommendation includes $800,000.
Technology assessment and deployment. --The technology assessment
and deployment program identifies and assesses innovative research
results, technology, and products, and promotes the application of those
advances that are determined to be of potential benefit to the highway
community through increased productivity, safety, and operations. Within
the funds provided for surface transportation research, the Committee
recommends $14,000,000 for technology assessment and deployment
activities, which represents an increase of $500,000 over the budget
request. The recent reorganization of FHWA, both at headquarters and in
the field, has changed how new technology is delivered to states and
local governments. The additional funds are to assist in the deployment
of technology in the field.
The Committee requests that by December 1, 1999, FHWA respond to each
of the recommendations presented in the Transportation Research Board
report on technology deployment and report to the House and Senate
Committees on Appropriations how FHWA will improve its mechanisms of
technology transfer and evaluations.
Research and technology support. --Within the funds provided for
surface transportation research, the Committee recommends $7,500,000 for
research and technology support. Sufficient funds are provided to ensure
continued support of the Research and Technology Coordinating Committee
of the Transportation Research Board. This senior level group provides
useful guidance and recommendations intended to improve FHWA's research,
development, and technology-related programs.
The Committee recognizes that the funding environment established by
Title V of TEA21 has created challenges for the FHWA in fully supporting
priority programs at previously planned levels. To meet that challenge,
the Committee notes that FHWA has vigorously pursued a national research
and technology partnership in conjunction with key partners including
the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,
the Transportation Research Board, academia, numerous safety and surface
transportation organizations, and the private sector. The Committee
supports those efforts to strengthen coalitions and partnerships to work
together on strategic R&T priorities, leverage federal funds, and ensure
that federal research investments meet the needs of the user community.
ITS standards, research, operational tests and development. --The
Committee recommends the $98,200,000 provided in TEA21 for ITS research
be allocated in the following manner:
Research and development $47,450,000
Operational tests 6,650,000
Evaluations 6,400,000
Architecture and standards 17,000,000
Integration 11,700,000
Program support 9,000,000
98,200,000
Research and development.-- The research and development program
supports the research and development of new ITS technologies to improve
the safety, mobility, and productivity of the surface transportation
system. In total, the Committee recommends $47,450,000 for research and
development activities. Within these funds, the Committee has allocated
$7,300,000 for commercial vehicle operations research, or $800,000 more
than requested. These additional funds shall help advance critical
safety data systems, such as SAFER/CVIEW and ASPEN, and further test the
Safer Data mailbox project that allows for the electronic retrieval of
information on prior inspections of commercial motor vehicles and
drivers. The mailbox technology provides a valuable tool used by
enforcement officers to reduce highway crashes and fatalities involving
trucks and buses. Using the information provided, state safety personnel
concentrate inspections on previously identified high-risk carriers and
drivers, especially those who do not correct out-of-service defects
identified in previous inspections.
The Safer Data mailbox project allows state enforcement officials
working at the roadside to gain access to near real-time inspection
information. One of the greatest needs for that information is to assist
officers working in the border states who are ensuring that safety
requirements are met as specified in NAFTA. Historical safety
information is lacking on carriers from adjoining countries, making
quick retrieval of safety information most critical. Past inspection
records in the mailbox system may be the only information available for
making critical safety and inspection decisions at the border. The
Committee expects FHWA to continue to advance this program and ensure
that it is made available to all states, especially border states. FHWA
shall work with a border state to serve as a lead technology
distribution agent to provide technical assistance to all states in
advancing and deploying the Safer Data mailbox system.
Operational tests. --The operational tests program provides a bridge
between research and development and large-scale deployment through the
technical testing of ITS technologies and by addressing institutional
barriers.
Intelligent vehicle initiative (IVI). --The Committee encourages the
director of the joint program office to continue to ensure that the
primary federal role in the IVI is focused on expediting the innovation
of integrated crash avoidance technologies for passenger vehicles. In
view of the substantial human factors research, performance
specification work, operational tests of crash avoidance technologies,
integration of information systems, and cost/benefit assessment work
that remains to be completed, an IVI program focused on this critical
safety area is of foremost importance.
Evaluations program. --The Committee recommends $6,400,000 for
program evaluation studies and recognizes the importance of continuing
to evaluate the benefits and costs of various ITS projects and to track
their progress.
Architecture and standards. --The architecture and standards program
provides for the maintenance, enhancement and application of the
national ITS architecture and the development and testing of ITS
standards. The Committee recommends $17,000,000 for architecture and
standards work, which is $3,000,000 more than requested in the budget.
The Committee recognizes the progress made to date on ITS standards and
expects that any provisional standards, if needed, will be issued within
the time frame specified in TEA21. It is essential to achieve a
nationally interoperable ITS network. During the last several years,
FHWA has been working diligently with the states, toll authorities, and
commercial vehicle carriers that must deal with continuing challenges to
interoperability, such as different payment procedures and divergent
business models. There remain many barriers to achieving national
interoperability. The Committee supports FHWA's continuing efforts to
eliminate or reduce those barriers, explore whether facilitated
resolutions can be achieved, and use the authorities provided in TEA21
to ensure an interoperable ITS network.
Integration. --The integration program supports training and
technical guidance for federal, state, and local professionals charged
with implementing integrated ITS systems. The Committee is pleased that
the department has changed the scope and nature of the mainstreaming
activity and supports initiatives to provide direct technical and
procurement assistance to states and other governmental entities
planning, evaluating, or deploying ITS.
National ITS program plan. --The Committee looks forward to
receiving as soon as possible an update of the National ITS Program
Plan, which is to be prepared in a manner consistent with requirements
of section 5205 of TEA21.
ITS deployment projects. --It is the intent of the Committee that
the following projects contribute to the integration and
interoperability of intelligent transportation systems in metropolitan
and rural areas as provided under section 5208 of the TEA21 and promote
deployment of the commercial vehicle intelligent transportation system
infrastructure as provided under section 5209 of TEA21. These projects
shall conform to the requirements set forth in these sections, including
the project selection criteria contained in section 5208(b) and the
priority areas outlined in section 5209(c), respectively. Funds provided
in TEA21 for ITS deployment activities are to be made available as
follows:
Project
Amount
Albuquerque, New Mexico $3,000,000
Central Pennsylvania 2,000,000
Chicago, Illinois 1,000,000
City of Superior and Douglas County, Wisconsin 1,000,000
Clay County, Missouri 300,000
Clearwater, Florida 5,000,000
College Station, Texas 2,000,000
Commonwealth of Virginia 12,000,000
Fairfield, California 750,000
Florida Bay County, Florida 2,000,000
Fort Worth, Texas 5,000,000
Houma, Louisiana 1,000,000
Houston, Texas 3,000,000
Huntsville, Alabama 200,000
Inglewood, California 1,000,000
Jefferson County, Colorado 2,500,000
Kansas City, Missouri 1,000,000
Los Angeles, California 1,800,000
Las Vegas, Nevada 2,790,000
Miami, Florida 2,000,000
Mission Viejo, California 1,000,000
Monroe County, New York 1,000,000
Northeast Florida 1,000,000
Oakland County, Michigan 3,000,000
Orlando, Florida 1,000,000
Oxford, Mississippi 3,000,000
Pueblo, Colorado 2,000,000
Rensselaer County, New York 1,000,000
Sacramento, California 1,000,000
San Francisco, California 1,000,000
Santa Clara, California 1,000,000
Seattle, Washington 5,700,000
Shreveport, Louisiana 1,000,000
State of Delaware 3,000,000
State of Idaho 2,000,000
State of Maryland 2,000,000
State of Minnesota 12,000,000
State of North Dakota 950,000
State of Oregon 2,000,000
State of Utah 3,500,000
States of New Jersey and New York 1,500,000
Thurston, Washington 1,000,000
Tuscon, Arizona 1,000,000
Wausau-Stevens Point-Wisconsin Rapids, Wisconsin 3,000,000
Washington, DC 8,000,000
Wayne County, Michigan 1,000,000
FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS
(LIQUIDATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION)
(HIGHWAY TRUST FUND)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 ($24,000,000,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 (26,000,000,000)
Recommended in the bill (26,125,000,000)
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +2,125,000,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 +125,000,000
The Committee recommends a liquidating cash appropriation of
$26,125,000,000. This is an increase of $2,125,000,000 over the fiscal
year 1999 enacted level and is needed to pay the outstanding obligations
of the various highway programs at levels provided in TEA21. This
appropriation is mandatory and has no scoring effect.
FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS
Federal-aid highways and bridges are managed through a federal-state
partnership. States and localities maintain ownership and responsibility
for maintenance, repair and new construction of roads. State highway
departments have the authority to initiate federal-aid projects subject
to FHWA approval of plans, specifications, and cost estimates. The
Federal Government provides financial support for construction and
repair through matching grants, the terms of which vary with the type of
road.
There are almost four million miles of public roads in the United
States and approximately 577,000 bridges. The Federal Government
provides grants to states to assist in financing the construction and
preservation of about 945,000 miles (24 percent) of these roads, which
represents an extensive interstate system plus key feeder and collector
routes. Highways eligible for federal aid carry about 85 percent of
total U.S. highway traffic.
The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA21)
reauthorized highway, highway safety, transit, and other surface
transportation programs through fiscal year 2003. The TEA21 builds on
programs and other initiatives established in the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991, the previous major
authorizing legislation for surface transportation programs.
Under the TEA21, Federal-aid highways funds are made available
through the following major programs:
National highway system. --The ISTEA of 1991 authorized--and the
National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 subsequently
established--the National Highway System (NHS). This 163,000-mile road
system serving major population centers, international border crossings,
intermodal transportation facilities and major travel destinations, is
the culmination of years of effort by many organizations, both public
and private, to identify routes of national significance. It includes
all Interstate routes, other urban and rural principal arterials, the
defense strategic highway network, and major strategic highway
connectors, and is estimated to carry up to 75 percent of commercial
truck traffic and 40 percent of all vehicular traffic. A state may
choose to transfer up to 50 percent of its NHS funds to the surface
transportation program category. If the Secretary approves, 100 percent
may be transferred. The federal share of the NHS is 80 percent, with an
availability period of 4 years.
Interstate maintenance. --The 46,000-mile Dwight D. Eisenhower
National System of Interstate and Defense Highways retains a separate
identity within the NHS. This program finances projects to rehabilitate,
restore, resurface and reconstruct the Interstate system. Reconstruction
of bridges, interchanges, and over-crossings along existing interstate
routes is also an eligible activity if it does not add capacity other
than high occupancy vehicle (HOV) and auxiliary lanes.
All remaining federal funding to complete the initial construction of
the Interstate system has been provided through previous highway
legislation. TEA21 provides flexibility to States in fully utilizing
remaining unobligated balances of prior Interstate Construction
authorizations. States with no remaining work to complete the Interstate
system may transfer any surplus Interstate Construction funds to their
Interstate maintenance program. States with remaining completion work on
Interstate gaps or open-to-traffic segments may relinquish Interstate
construction fund eligibility for the work and transfer the federal
share of the cost to their Interstate maintenance program.
Surface transportation program. --The Surface Transportation Program
(STP) is a very flexible program that may be used by the states and
localities for any roads (including NHS) that are not functionally
classified as local or rural minor collectors. These roads are
collectively referred to as Federal-aid highways. Bridge projects paid
with STP funds are not restricted to Federal-aid highways but may be on
any public road. Transit capital projects are also eligible under this
program. The total funding for the STP may be augmented by the transfer
of funds from other programs and by minimum guarantee funds under TEA21
which may be used as if they were STP funds. Once distributed to the
states, STP funds must be used according to the following percentages:
10 percent for safety construction; 10 percent for transportation
enhancement; 50 percent divided among areas of over 200,000 population
and remaining areas of the State; and, 30 percent for any area of the
state. Areas of 5,000 population or less are guaranteed an amount based
on previous funding, and 15 percent of the amounts reserved for these
areas may be spent on rural minor collectors. The federal share for the
STP program is 80 percent with a 4-year availability period.
Bridge replacement and rehabilitation program. --This program is
continued by TEA21 to provide assistance for bridges on public roads
including a discretionary set-aside for high cost bridges and for the
seismic retrofit of bridges. Fifty percent of a state's bridge funds may
be transferred to the NHS or the STP, but the amount of any such
transfer is deducted from the national bridge needs used in the
program's apportionment formula for the following year.
Congestion mitigation and air quality improvement program. --This
program provides funds to states to improve air quality in
non-attainment and maintenance areas. A wide range of transportation
activities are eligible, as long as DOT, after consultation with EPA,
determines they are likely to help meet national ambient air quality
standards. TEA21 provides greater flexibility to engage public-private
partnerships, and expands and clarifies eligibilities to include
programs to reduce extreme cold starts, maintenance areas, and
particulate matter (PM 10) nonattainment and maintenance areas. If a
state has no non-attainment or maintenance areas, the funds may be used
as if they were STP funds.
Federal lands highways. --This program provides authorizations
through three major categories--Indian reservation roads, parkways and
park roads, and public lands highways (which incorporates the previous
forest highways category)--as well as a new category for federally-owned
public roads providing access to or within the National Wildlife Refuge
System. TEA21 also establishes a new program for improving deficient
bridges on Indian reservation roads.
Funds provided for the federal lands program in fiscal year 2000
shall be available for the following activities:
Project
Amount
Austin Junction-Baker County Line section of US 26, Oregon $6,500,000
Blackstone Valley National Heritage Corridor, Rhode Island 2,000,000
Chincoteague National Wildlife Refuge, Virginia 1,000,000
Daniel Boone Parkway, Kentucky 2,000,000
Historic Columbia River Highway state trail, Oregon 500,000
Lemhi Pass Road, west of Clark Canyon dam, Montana 2,000,000
Highway 117 feasibility study, Louisiana 500,000
North Fork Road in Columbia Falls, Montana 2,400,000
Soldier Hollow improvements, Utah 4,000,000
SR 248, Utah 4,000,000
Timucuan Preserve Road, Florida 1,000,000
Minimum guarantee. --Under TEA21, after the computation of funds for
major Federal-aid programs has been completed, additional funds are
distributed to ensure that each State receives an additional amount
based on equity considerations. This minimum guarantee provision ensures
that each State will have a return of 90.5 percent on its share of
contributions to the highway account of the Highway Trust Fund. To
achieve the minimum guarantee each fiscal year, $2.8 billion nationally
is available to the States as though they are STP funds (except that
requirements related to set-asides for transportation enhancements,
safety, and sub-State allocations do not apply), and any remaining
amounts are distributed among core highway programs.
Emergency relief. --This program provides for the repair and
reconstruction of Federal-aid highways and Federally-owned roads which
have suffered serious damage as the result of natural disasters or
catastrophic failures. TEA21 restates the program eligibility specifying
that emergency relief (ER) funds can be used only for emergency repairs
to restore essential highway traffic, to minimize the extent of damage
resulting from a natural disaster or catastrophic failure, or to protect
the remaining facility and make permanent repairs. If ER funds are
exhausted, the Secretary of Transportation may borrow funds from other
highway programs.
High priority projects. --TEA21 includes 1,850 high priority
projects specified by the Congress. Funding for these projects totals
$9.5 billion over the 6 year period with a specified percentage of the
project funds made available each year. Unlike demonstration projects in
the past, the funds for TEA21 high priority projects are subject to the
Federal-aid obligation limitation, but the obligation limitation
associated with the projects does not expire.
Appalachian development highway system. --This program makes funds
available to construct highways and access roads under section 201 of
the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965. Under TEA21, funding
is authorized at $450,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1999 2003; is
available until expended and distributed based on the latest available
cost-to-complete estimate.
National corridor planning and border infrastructure programs.
--TEA21 established a new national corridor planning and development
program that provides funds for the coordinated planning, design, and
construction of corridors of national significance, economic growth, and
international or interregional trade. Allocations may be made to
corridors identified in section 1105(c) of ISTEA and to other corridors
using considerations identified in legislation. The coordinated border
infrastructure program is established to improve the safe movement of
people and goods at or across the U.S./Canadian and U.S./Mexican
borders. The Committee directs that $10,000,000 shall be available to
Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas to procure portable scales,
facilities and equipment and to lease land necessary to house additional
OMCHS inspectors.
Transportation and community and system preservation pilot program.
--TEA21 established a new transportation and community and system
preservation program that provides grants to states and local
governments for planning, developing, and implementing strategies to
integrate transportation and community and system preservation plans and
practices. These grants may be used to improve the efficiency of the
transportation system; reduce the impacts of transportation on the
environment; reduce the need for costly future investments in public
infrastructure; and provide efficient access to jobs, services, and
centers of trade.
Funds provided for the transportation and community and system
preservation pilot program in fiscal year 2000 shall be available for
the following activities:
Project
Amount
Arlington County, Virginia pedestrian, bicycle access and other transit improvements $1,000,000
City of New Haven, Connecticut trolley cars 500,000
Community and environmental transportation acceptability program of southern California 1,000,000
Florence, Alabama pedestrian and other transportation improvements 1,500,000
Fort Worth, Texas corridor redevelopment and transit linkages 3,000,000
Green Bay, Wisconsin pedestrian improvements and livable communities projects 1,000,000
DuPage County, Illinois transportation alternatives development 1,000,000
Houston, Texas Main Street corridor livable communities 1,000,000
Knoxville, Tennessee electric transit project 1,000,000
Metrowest regional transportation study, Massachusetts 500,000
Monmouth County, New Jersey pedestrian improvements 300,000
Montclair, New Jersey connection transit livable communities 500,000
New Rochelle, New York intermodal center 1,000,000
Northwest Michigan transportation use initiative 250,000
Potomac River ferry 500,000
Richmond, Virginia Main Street intermodal facility 4,000,000
River Market/College Station, Arkansas livable communities 1,000,000
San Francisco, California civic center plaza 1,700,000
Savannah, Georgia water taxi 1,000,000
Seattle, Washington water taxi 750,000
South Amboy, New Jersey regional multimodal transportation initiative 500,000
White Plains, New York TRANSCENTER pedestrian improvements 2,000,000
FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS
(HIGHWAY TRUST FUND)
Limitation, fiscal year 1999 ($25,511,000,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ (27,262,230,000)
Recommended in the bill\2\ (27,701,350,000)
xlBill compared with:
Limitation, fiscal year 1999 (+2,190,350,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 (+439,120,000)
\1\The budget request includes new obligations of $1,519,350,000 associated with revenue aligned budget authority, of which $502,120,000 is transferred to other modal administrations.
\2\The Committee recommendation includes $26,245,000,000 in guaranteed obligations and $1,456,350,000 in obligations resulting from revenue aligned budget authority.
The accompanying bill includes language limiting fiscal year 2000
federal-aid highways obligations to $27,701,350,000, an increase of
$2,190,350,000 over the 1999 enacted level and $439,120,000 over the
budget request. The recommended level is the level assumed in TEA21.
These funds are guaranteed under the highway category.
The obligation limitation for the federal-aid highways program
contained in this bill includes $1,456,350,000 in obligations resulting
from revenue aligned budget authority. TEA21 provides for an automatic
increase in the federal-aid highway program budget authority and
obligation authority in any budget year in which projected income to the
highway account of the highway trust fund exceeds estimates of income to
the trust fund that were made at the time TEA21 was enacted. By law, a
determination of the size of this increase in so-called ``firewall''
spending levels is made in the President's budget submission. TEA21
calls for any such increases in budget authority to be distributed
proportionately among federal-aid highways appportioned and allocated
programs, and for the overall federal-aid obligation limitation to be
increased by an equal amount. The estimate of increased income, and
therefore, budget authority and obligations, for fiscal year 2000 is
$1,456,350,000.
The budget request--in contravention of TEA21 provisions proposed to
allocate this additional obligational authority in fiscal year 2000 to
other programs, including NHTSA's operations and research program; FTA's
formula grants and national research programs; FHWA's research and
technology, congestion mitigation, and motor carrier safety grants
programs; and FRA's rail program. The accompanying bill allocates the
additional obligational authority consistent with the provisions of
TEA21.
Although the following table reflects an estimated distribution of
obligations by program category, the bill includes a limitation
applicable only to the total of certain federal-aid spending. The
following table indicates estimated obligations by program within the
$27,701,350,000 provided by this Act and additional resources made
available by permanent law:
FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAYS ESTIMATED OBLIGATIONS
[In thousands of dollars]
Programs FY 1998 actual FY 1999 estimate FY 2000 estimate (Presidential budget) FY 2000 estimate (current law)
Subject to limitation: $5,936,062 $5,818,830 $5,993,039 6,286,764
----------------- ------------------- ----------------------------------------- --------------------------------
Total subject to obligation limitation 19,569,736 \1\25,031,637 27,213,698 \2\27,701,350
================= =================== ========================================= ================================
Emergency relief program 83,040 140,016 100,000 100,000
Minimum allocation/guarantee 555,159 833,684 716,874 716,874
Demonstration projects 405,379 450,346 315,242 315,242
----------------- ------------------- ----------------------------------------- --------------------------------
Total exempt programs 1,043,578 1,424,046 1,132,116 1,132,116
Emergency relief supplemental 362,822 115,956
----------------- ------------------- ----------------------------------------- --------------------------------
Grand total, Federal-aid highways (direct) 20,976,136 26,571,639 28,345,814 28,833,466
\1\Reflects estimated obligation which is less than the obligation limitation ($25,511 billion) as provided by TEA21.
\2\At this level of obligation limitation, an estimated $27,603 billion will be obligated in fiscal year 2000.
The following table reflects the estimated distribution of the
federal-aid limitation by state:
ESTIMATED FY 2000 OBLIGATION LIMITATION
[in thousands of dollars]
State Estimated FY 2000 formula limitation FY 2000 minimum guarantee Appalachian development highways Total Change from FY 1999
Alabama $386,926 $35,581 $43,312 $465,819 +$31,311
Alaska 207,839 65,797 273,636 +19,609
Arizona 344,238 44,183 388,421 +28,431
Arkansas 273,370 27,763 301,133 +20,123
California 1,988,217 130,113 2,118,330 +143,128
Colorado 260,070 16,332 276,402 +19,728
Connecticut 299,269 48,383 347,652 +23,867
Delaware 99,133 7,877 107,011 +7,988
District of Columbia 92,574 311 92,885 +6,393
Florida 926,486 156,463 1,082,949 +76,911
Georgia 710,515 103,261 17,309 831,085 +57,434
Hawaii 107,743 10,512 118,255 +7,934
Idaho 149,414 20,109 169,524 +10,535
Illinois 733,062 37,820 770,882 +50,695
Indiana 510,511 68,518 579,029 +39,751
Iowa 266,318 11,720 278,037 +18,819
Kansas 264,786 6,284 271,069 +18,223
Kentucky 329,643 31,309 39,732 400,683 +27,167
Louisiana 350,742 34,749 385,491 +25,617
Maine 113,767 9,155 122,922 +8,589
Maryland 337,686 23,363 6,773 367,823 +25,204
Massachusetts 402,108 23,737 425,845 +28,221
Michigan 664,606 73,186 737,793 +49,727
Minnesota 319,401 19,612 339,013 +21,983
Mississippi 258,031 17,426 4,857 280,314 +18,873
Missouri 521,290 39,839 561,130 +37,478
Montana 204,715 33,010 237,726 +17,805
Nebraska 181,468 5,836 187,304 +13,701
Nevada 151,536 18,618 170,154 +12,158
New Hampshire 106,292 9,737 116,030 +7,500
New Jersey 551,013 35,326 586,340 +38,422
New Mexico 205,869 22,440 228,309 +15,732
New York 1,070,227 87,815 9,335 1,167,378 +76,141
North Carolina 558,308 69,988 25,500 653,796 +45,093
North Dakota 146,177 11,157 157,334 +11,573
Ohio 765,190 70,447 19,531 855,168 +57,973
Oklahoma 337,812 23,040 360,852 +25,059
Oregon 266,215 11,364 277,579 +18,038
Pennsylvania 940,620 64,758 105,903 1,111,281 +69,174
Rhode Island 125,966 15,404 141,370 +10,309
South Carolina 327,550 43,633 2,122 373,305 +26,703
South Dakota 152,054 13,262 165,316 +11,342
Tennessee 442,633 38,969 48,558 530,159 +35,665
Texas 1,556,806 202,277 1,759,084 +124,253
Utah 167,905 11,118 179,022 +11,909
Vermont 102,097 6,719 108,815 +7,850
Virginia 533,386 51,248 10,206 594,840 +41,165
Washington 395,973 20,047 416,020 +27,400
West Virginia 181,279 8,108 60,224 249,611 +14,850
Wisconsin 408,157 50,594 458,751 +31,563
Wyoming 154,882 11,681 166,563 +12,206
-------------------------------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------------- ------------ ----------------------
-------------------------------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------------- ------------ ----------------------
Special Limitation: 1,584,468 344,756
====================================== =========================== ================================== ============ ======================
Total limitation 27,701,350 2,190,349
MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY GRANTS
(HIGHWAY TRUST FUND)
(LIQUIDATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $100,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 155,000,000
Recommended in the bill 105,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +5,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 -50,000,000
The motor carrier safety assistance grants program (MCSAP) is
intended to assist states in developing or implementing national
programs for the uniform enforcement of federal and state rules and
regulations concerning motor carrier safety. The major objective of this
program is to reduce the number and severity of accidents involving
commercial motor vehicles. Grants are made to qualified states for the
development of programs to enforce the federal motor carrier safety and
hazardous materials regulations and the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety
Act of 1986. The basic program is targeted at roadside vehicle safety
inspections of both interstate and intrastate commercial motor vehicle
traffic.
On May 14, 1999, the department submitted an amended budget request
that raised the motor carrier safety grants program from $105,000,000 to
$155,000,000. The proposed $50,000,000 to be derived from revenue
aligned budget authority is in contravention to existing law. Such a
request does not indicate a true commitment to safety, as revenue
aligned budget authority must be allocated to the states under existing
law. Moreover, such a funding mechanism may not be sustained as revenue
aligned budget authority is subject to annual fluctuations in highway
trust fund collections.
The Committee recommends $105,000,000 in liquidating cash for this
program. This is an increase of $5,000,000 above the level enacted in
fiscal year 1999.
LIMITATIONS ON OBLIGATIONS
The Committee recommends a $105,000,000 limitation on obligations for
motor carrier safety grants. This is the level guaranteed within the
highway category of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century.
None of this funding is to be derived from revenue aligned budget
authority.
The Committee recommends the allocation of funds as follows:
Motor carrier safety assistance program:
$95,000,000
Basic motor carrier safety grants 75,881,250
Performance-based incentive grant program 8,431,250
Border assistance 4,750,000
High-priority activities 4,750,000
Training 1,187,500
Information systems and strategic safety initiatives:
10,000,000
Information systems 3,200,000
Motor carrier analysis 1,100,000
Implementation of PRISM 4,875,000
Driver programs 825,000
Performance-based incentive grant program. --Numerous experts have
testified to the Committee about the poor data collected by the states
on the number of fatal truck accidents. The General Accounting Office
found that ``states did not report an estimated 38 percent of all
crashes and 30 percent of the fatal crashes involving large trucks in
1997. Of the total number of states, 10 reported fewer than 50 percent
of the fatal crashes occurring within their border and 4 reported fewer
than 10 percent.'' OMCHS uses this data to identify high-risk carriers
for compliance reviews, safety actions and improvements. Without
accurate and timely data, OMCHS is likely to miss carriers that are
involved in a substantial number of crashes on our nation's highways.
The Committee urges OMCHS to allocate a significant portion of this
funding to help states improve the accuracy, quality and timeliness of
their data. Small incentive grants have proven to be very successful in
the past. For example, in 1997, the State of Mississippi only reported 1
of 99 fatal crashes. After receiving a one-time incentive grant,
Mississippi reported over 1,500 crashes.
Commercial drivers license program. --Recent accidents, such as
Bourbonnais, Illinois and New Orleans, Louisiana, have brought serious
problems with the commercial drivers license (CDL) program to light. It
has been reported that the drivers in these two accidents each had been
ticketed or cited repeatedly for serious traffic violations yet they
continued to hold a CDL. More needs to be done to ensure that states
have the most up-to-date conviction data on CDL holders and that this
information can be transferred from state to state easily. OMCHS should
work with the states on resolving this issue and report to the House
Committee on Appropriations by May 1, 2000, on the office's efforts and
results.
NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
SUMMARY OF FISCAL YEAR 2000 PROGRAM
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) was
established as a separate organizational entity in the Department of
Transportation in March 1970. It succeeded the National Highway Safety
Bureau, which previously had administered traffic and highway safety
functions as an organizational unit of the Federal Highway
Administration.
The administration's current statutes and programs are authorized in
four major laws: (1) the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act,
(chapter 301 of title 49, U.S.C.); (2) the Highway Safety Act, (chapter
4 of title 23, U.S.C.); (3) the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost
Savings (MVCIS) Act, (Part C of subtitle VI of title 49, U.S.C.); and
(4) the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA21).
The first law provides for the establishment and enforcement of
safety standards for vehicles and associated equipment and the conduct
of supporting research, including the acquisition of required testing
facilities and the operation of the national driver register (NDR).
Discrete authorizations were subsequently established for the NDR under
the National Driver Register Act of 1982.
The second law provides for coordinated national highway safety
programs (section 402) to be carried out by the states and for highway
safety research, development, and demonstration programs (section 403).
The Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 (Public Law 100 690) authorized a new
drunk driving prevention program (section 410) to make grants to states
to implement and enforce drunk driving prevention programs.
The third law (MVICS) provides for the establishment of low-speed
collision bumper standards, consumer information activities, diagnostic
inspection demonstration projects, automobile content labeling, and
odometer regulations. An amendment to this law established the
Secretary's responsibility, which was delegated to NHTSA, for the
administration of mandatory automotive fuel economy standards. A 1992
amendment to the MVICS established automobile content labeling
requirements.
The fourth law (TEA21) reauthorizes the full range of NHTSA programs
and enacts a number of new initiatives. These include: safety incentives
to prevent operation of motor vehicles by intoxicated persons (section
163 of title 23 U.S.C.); seat belt incentive grants (section 157 of
title 23 U.S.C.); occupant protection incentive grants (section 405);
and highway safety data improvement incentive grant program (section
411). TEA21 also reauthorized highway safety research, development and
demonstration programs (section 403) to include research measures that
may deter drugged driving, educate the motoring public on how to share
the road safely with commercial motor vehicles, and provide vehicle
pursuit training for police. Finally, TEA21 adopts a number of new motor
vehicle safety and information provisions, including rulemaking
directions for improving air bag crash protection systems, lobbying
restrictions, exemptions from the odometer requirements for classes or
categories of vehicles the Secretary deems appropriate, and adjustments
to the automobile domestic content labeling requirements.
TRAFFIC SAFETY TRENDS
In 1992, the nation experienced the lowest number of highway
fatalities since 1962--39,250--despite an increasing amount of travel on
the roadways. This trend has reversed itself since then. However, it
appears that fatalities may be leveling off. The latest NHTSA data
indicates fatalities in 1998 were 41,480, which is a decrease from
42,013 fatalities in 1997. In comparing 1998 to 1997, there was a 3.9
percent decrease in the number of police-reported traffic crashes and a
4.4 percent decrease in reported injuries caused by those accidents.
The fatality rate has remained constant, 1.6 deaths per 100 million
vehicle miles traveled (VMT), where it stood for the first time in 1997.
In 1998, this rate continued even with an estimated increase of 2
percent VMT from 1997. The following charts show these safety trends.
[Graphic Image Not Available]
The percentage of traffic crashes involving alcohol decreased in
1998. An estimated 15,936 people (38 percent) were killed in
alcohol-related crashes, down from 39 percent in 1997. This is the
lowest rate since recordkeeping began in 1975.
OPERATIONS AND RESEARCH
(General fund) (Highway trust fund)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999\1\ --- $161,400,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 --- 199,450,000
Recommended in the bill $87,400,000 74,000,000
xlBill compared to:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +87,400,000 -87,400,000
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 +87,400,000 -125,450,000
\1\Amount for fiscal year 1999 excludes $752,000 in supplemental emergency appropriations for Year 2000 activities.
TEA21 authorized a total appropriation level of $161,400,000 for
NHTSA's operations and research activities in fiscal year 2000. This
total consists of three separate authorizations. First, the bill
includes $72,000,000 of contract authority from the Highway Trust Fund
to finance NHTSA's operations and research activities under title 23
U.S.C. 403. This funding is included within the firewall guarantee for
highway spending and is not subject to an appropriation. Second, TEA 21
includes an authorization, subject to appropriation, of $87,400,000 for
operations and research activities under section 30102 and 30104 of
title 49 U.S.C. Third, the bill includes an authorization from the
Highway Trust Fund of $2,000,000 for the National Driver Register. This
funding is subject to appropriations.
For fiscal year 2000, the Administration requested a total of
$199,450,000 for NHTSA's operations and research activities. Funding was
to be allocated as follows: $72,000,000 in guaranteed funds for
activities eligible under title 23 U.S.C.; $2,000,000 for the National
Driver Register; and $125,450,000 from revenue aligned budget authority
(RABA).
The Committee is greatly disappointed in the fiscal year 2000 budget
request for NHTSA. Safety is purported to be the department's guiding
principle, or ``North star''. However, under its budget proposal, RABA
funding supplants general revenues for approximately 55 percent of
NHTSA's operations and research account unlike other elements of the
department's budget request in which RABA funds supplement existing
program levels. Such budget gimmickery does not indicate a sincere
commitment to safety. Further, by submitting this request to Congress,
the department is shortchanging safety by not continuing a reliable
funding source for safety programs. The higher than anticipated increase
in gasoline tax receipts, that is used to fund NHTSA's safety programs,
is not assured in future years.
The Committee recommends new budget authority and obligation
limitations for a total program level of $161,400,000, the same level as
enacted in fiscal year 1999. None of this funding is from revenue
aligned budget authority.
The Committee has worked with NHTSA to identify program reductions in
its fiscal year 2000 budget request to comply with the levels authorized
under TEA21 and recommends that the funding provided in this Act for
operations and research be distributed as follows:
Salaries and benefits $53,152,000
Travel 1,501,000
Operating expenses 18,986,000
xlContract programs:
Safety performance 3,429,000
Safety assurance 9,045,000
Highway safety programs 36,298,000
Research and analysis 48,317,000
General administration 645,000
Grant administration reimbursements -9,973,000
--------------
Total $161,400,000
Between now and the time for conference action on this bill, NHTSA
shall provide its recommendations to the House Committee on
Appropriations as to how reductions from the budget request shall be
distributed.
New staff positions. --The Committee has approved half-year funding
for 12 of the 14 new positions requested in the budget. Funding for
these positions is provided for one-half year because NHTSA will need to
complete an extensive recruitment effort before hiring several of these
positions. The Committee recommendation does not include funding for two
general administration positions. NHTSA is unable to justify the need to
hire technical support for Y2K issues after January 1, 2000 (-$381,000).
Safe communities. --The Committee has denied funding for the safe
communities program (-$2,250,000). In fiscal year 1999, funding for this
initiative was deleted because the program had concluded its initial
three-year effort. The Committee sees no merit in continuing to fund
this program beyond its original three-year pilot period when there are
over 500 safe communities projects throughout the United States today.
Driver license identification. --The Committee continues to carry a
general provision (sec. 332) that prohibits NHTSA from finalizing its
rule on driver license identification. As such, the Committee has
deleted funding for this initiative (-$325,000).
Biomechanics .--At a minimum, NHTSA shall continue to support the
biomechanics program at the 1999 level. The Committee continues to
support the work conducted by the crash injury research and engineering
network at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey; the
Charles McMathias National Study Center for Trauma and EMS; the William
Lehman Injury Research Center; the Children's National Medical Center;
the University of Michigan Medical Center; the University of California
Medical School; and the Harborview Medical Center. It is important that
these centers receive a consistent stream of funding from year to year.
Human resource information center. --The Committee has not provided
any funding for the human resource information center throughout the
department. Further discussion can be found earlier in this report under
the office of the secretary, office of the assistant secretary for
administration. (-$223,000).
National driver register .--Within the $2,000,000 provided for the
national driver register, up to $250,000 can be used for the technology
assessment authorized under section 2006 of TEA21.
Bill language .--The Committee has included a provision prohibiting
any agency funded in this Act from planning, finalizing, or implementing
any rulemaking which would require passenger car tires be labeled to
indicate their low rolling resistance. Also, the bill contains a general
provision (sec. 320) that prohibits funds from being used to prepare,
prescribe, or promulgate corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards
for automobiles that differ from those previously enacted. The
limitation does not preclude the Secretary of Transportation, in order
to meet lead time requirements of the law, from preparing, proposing,
and issuing a CAFE standard for model year 2002 automobiles that is
identical to the CAFE standard established for such automobiles for
model year 2001.
HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY GRANTS
(Liquidation of Contract Authorization)
(Highway Trust Fund)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $200,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 206,800,000
Recommended in the bill 206,800,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +6,800,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 .........................
TEA21 authorized four state grant programs: the highway safety
program, the alcohol-impaired driving countermeasures grant program, the
occupant protection incentive grant program, and the state highway
safety data improvement grant program. The Committee recommends
$206,800,000 for the liquidation of contract authorization, which is a
3.4 percent increase over the 1999 enacted level. This funding is
mandatory and has no scoring implications.
LIMITATION ON OBLIGATIONS
As in past years and recommended in the budget request, the bill
includes language limiting the obligations to be incurred under the
various highway traffic safety grants programs. These obligations are
included within the highway guarantee. The bill includes separate
obligation limitations with the following funding allocations:
Fiscal year 1999 enacted Fiscal year 2000 estimate Recommended in the bill
Highway safety grants $150,000,000 $152,800,000 $152,800,000
Occupant protection grants 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000
Alcohol incentive grants 35,000,000 36,000,000 36,000,000
State highway safety data improvements 5,000,000 8,000,000 8,000,000
---------------------------- ----------------------------- ---------------------------
Highway safety grants .--These grants are awarded to states for the
purpose of reducing traffic crashes, fatalities and injuries. The states
may use the grants to implement programs to reduce deaths and injuries
caused by exceeding posted speed limits; encourage proper use of
occupant protection devices; reduce alcohol-and drug-impaired driving;
reduce crashes between motorcycles and other vehicles; reduce school bus
crashes; improve police traffic services; improve emergency medical
services and trauma care systems; increase pedestrian and bicyclist
safety; increase safety among older and younger drivers; and improve
roadway safety. The grants also provide additional support for state
data collection and reporting of traffic deaths and injuries.
An obligation limitation of $152,800,000 is included in the bill,
which is the same amount as requested. The national occupant protection
survey shall be funded within this total. Also, language is included in
the bill that limits funding available for federal grants administration
from this program to $7,500,000 for NHTSA.
The bill continues to carry language that prohibits the use of funds
for construction, rehabilitation, and remodeling costs or for office
furnishings or fixtures for state, local, or private buildings or
structures.
Alcohol-impaired driving incentive grants. --These grants will offer
two-tiered basic and supplemental grants to reward states that pass new
laws and start more effective programs to attack drunk and impaired
driving. States may qualify for basic grants in two ways. First, they
can implement 5 of the following 7 laws and programs: (1) administrative
license revocation; (2) programs to prevent drivers under age 21 from
obtaining alcoholic beverages; (3) intensive impaired driving law
enforcement; (4) graduated licensing law with nighttime driving
restrictions and zero tolerance; (5) drivers with high
blood-alcohol-content (BAC); (6) young adult programs to reduce impaired
driving by individuals ages 21 34; (7) an effective system for
increasing the rate of testing for BAC of drivers in fatal crashes.
Second, they can demonstrate a reduction in alcohol involved fatality
rates in each of the last three years and demonstrate rates lower than
the national average for each of the last three years. Supplemental
grants are provided to states that adopt additional measures, including
videotaping of drunk drivers by police; self-sustaining impaired driving
programs; laws to reduce driving with suspended licenses; use of passive
alcohol sensors by police; a system for tracking information on drunk
drivers; and other innovative programs. The Committee has provided
$36,000,000 for these grants in fiscal year 2000. Language is included
in the bill that limits funding available for federal grants
administration from this program to $1,750,000.
In addition to the alcohol-impaired driving incentive grant program,
TEA21 authorized $500,000,000 in grants over six years for states that
have enacted and are enforcing a 0.08 BAC law (section 163). For each
fiscal year a state meets this criterion, it will receive a grant in the
same ratio in which they receive section 402 funds. The states may use
these funds for any project eligible for assistance under title 23 (e.g.
highway construction, bridge repair, etc.). This grant program, combined
with the alcohol impaired driving incentive grant program will
significantly increase the resources the department has to encourage
states to adopt and enforce anti-drunk driving legislation.
Occupant protection incentive grants. --The Committee has fully
funded the occupant protection incentive grant program at $10,000,000.
States may qualify for this new grant program by implementing 4 of the
following 6 laws and programs: (1) a law requiring safety belt use by
all front seat passengers; (2) a safety belt use law providing for
primary enforcement; (3) minimum fines or penalty points for seat belt
and child seat use law violations; (4) special traffic enforcement
programs for occupant protection; (5) a child passenger protection
education program; and (6) a child passenger protection law which
requires minors to be properly secured. Language is included in the bill
that limits funding available for federal grants administration from
this program to $500,000.
In addition to the occupant protection incentive grant program, TEA21
established a safety incentive grant program (section 157) to encourage
states to increase seat belt usage. The grant program totals
$500,000,000 over six years. Allocations of federal grants require
determinations of (1) seat belt use rates and improvements and (2)
federal medical cost savings attributable to increased seat belt use.
States that meet the section 157 requirements can use funds for any
purpose under title 23, including highway construction and intelligent
transportation systems. NHTSA and FHWA are jointly administering this
program. NHTSA will collect the state data and determine the allocation
of funds.
State highway safety data improvements .--The Committee has provided
$8,000,000 for the state highway safety data improvement grants program.
To receive first year grants, a state has three options. Option 1:
establish a multi-disciplinary highway safety data and traffic records
coordinating committee; complete a highway safety data and traffic
records assessment or audit within the last five years; and initiate
development of a multi-year highway safety data and traffic records
strategic plan. Option 2: a state must certify that it has met the first
two criteria in Option 1; submit a data and traffic records multi-year
plan; and certify that the coordinating committee continues to operate
and support the plan. Option 3: the Secretary may award grants of up to
$25,000 for one year to any state that does not meet the criteria for
Option 1. States that receive first year grants then would be eligible
for subsequent grants by: submitting or updating a data and traffic
multi-year plan; certifying that the coordinating committee continues to
support the multi-year plan; and reporting annually on the progress made
to implement the plan. Language is included in the bill that limits
funding available for federal grants administration from this program to
$223,000.
FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION
SUMMARY OF FISCAL YEAR 2000 PROGRAM
The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is responsible for
planning, developing, and administering programs to achieve safe
operating and mechanical practices in the railroad industry, as well as
managing the high speed ground transportation program. Grants to the
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) and other financial
assistance programs to rehabilitate and improve the railroad industry's
physical plant are also administered by the FRA.
The total recommended program level for the FRA for fiscal year 2000
is $718,724,000, which is $60,847,000 more than requested. The following
table summarizes the fiscal year 1999 program levels, the fiscal year
2000 program requests and the Committee's recommendations:
Program Fiscal year 1999 enacted level Fiscal year 2000 request Recommended in the bill
Office of the Administrator $21,215,000 --- ---
Railroad safety 61,488,000 --- ---
Safety and operations\1\ (85,574,000) $95,462,000 $94,448,000
Safety and operations user fees --- -66,461,000 ---
Railroad research and development 22,364,000 21,800,000 21,300,000
Railroad research and development user fees --- -21,300,000 ---
Next generation high speed rail 20,494,000 12,000,000 22,000,000
Alaska railroad 38,000,000 --- ---
Rhode Island rail development 5,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000
Grants to National Railroad Passenger Corporation 609,230,000 570,976,000 570,976,000
Rail initiative (limitation on obligations) --- (35,400,000) ---
---------------------------------- ---------------------------- --------------------------
\1\Shown for comparability purposes; includes funding appropriated in the office of the administrator, railroad safety, a portion of the research and development account, and a portion of the next generation high-speed rail account.
OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $21,215,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 ---
Recommended in the bill ---
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -21,215,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 ---
This account provides funds for executive direction and
administration, policy support, passenger and freight services, salaries
and expenses, and contractual support. The Committee recommends
combining the office of the administrator with FRA's railroad safety
program, and personnel from the railroad research and development and
next generation high-speed rail programs, as described below.
RAILROAD SAFETY
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $61,488,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 ---
Recommended in the bill ---
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -61,488,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 ---
The federal role in the railroad safety program is to protect
railroad employees and the public by ensuring the safe operation of
passenger and freight trains. The authority to accomplish this role is
found in the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970 (as amended), the
Department of Transportation Act, and the Hazardous Materials
Transportation Act. Greatly expanded railroad safety authority was
granted the FRA under the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 1988. The
Committee recommends combining the office of the administrator with
FRA's railroad safety program, and personnel from the railroad research
and development and next generation high-speed rail programs, as
described below.
SAFETY AND OPERATIONS
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999\1\ ($85,574,000)
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000\2\ 95,462,000
Recommended in the bill 94,448,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +8,874,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 -1,014,000
\1\Shown for comparability purposes; includes funding appropriated in the office of the administrator, railroad safety, a portion of the research and development account, and a portion of the next generation high-speed rail account.
\2\Of this total, $66,461,000 was to be offset from new rail safety user fees.
The administration's fiscal year 2000 request restructured FRA's
salaries and expense accounts into one new account--safety and
operations. The restructuring consolidates the entire office of the
administrator and railroad safety with personnel from the railroad
research and development and next generation high-speed rail programs.
The safety and operations account will provide support for FRA's rail
safety activities and all other administrative and operating activities
related to staff and programs. The presentation of all staffing and
operations into a single account is consistent with account structures
in other modal administrations.
A total of $94,448,000 has been allocated for the new safety and
operations account. The Committee is very supportive of this new
structure. It should provide FRA more flexibility with its personnel and
program costs. For example, under the new structure, FRA will have
centralized costs for the entire administration instead of allocating
costs within four different appropriations accounts. This will allow FRA
to better track safety, administrative and program costs (such as rent,
travel, and information technology), and reallocate funding or personnel
to those programs that have immediate needs.
The following adjustments have been made to the budget request:
Reduce funding for new positions -$411,000
Deny funding for new human resource information system -253,000
Other support -500,000
Credit availability study +150,000
New positions .--The Committee has approved the new positions
requested to support ongoing programs; however, it has reduced the
funding available for these positions (-$411,000). The budget requested
a total of $726,000 for 6.5 new positions, which is over $113,000 per
position. These costs are excessive, particularly for half-year funding.
Funding has been reduced to $50,000 per position, which is the same
funding level FRA hired its new safety inspectors in fiscal year 1999.
Human resource information system .--The Committee has not provided
any funding for the human resource information center throughout the
department (-$253,000). Further discussion can be found earlier in this
report under the office of the secretary, office of the assistant
secretary for administration.
Other support .--The administration requested $1,000,000 for other
support costs; however, the budget documentation was only able to
justify half of these costs. The Committee has denied the remainder
(-$500,000).
Credit availability study .--A total of $150,000 has been provided
to study the availability of private sector credit to shortline and
regional railroads. This study should include: (1) a review of the
financial institutions that have provided credit to small railroads
during the last 5 years, the general terms of the financing and the
financial performance of the borrowers; (2) an assessment of the key
financial measures of profitability, stability, and financial strength
used by the financial institutions in evaluating the creditworthiness of
the shortline and regional railroads that have received credit; and (3)
an evaluation of the appropriateness to the small railroad industry of
the financial performance ratios used by the financial institutions that
have provided credit.
Training .--Sufficient funding is included within the Committee's
recommendation to provide for peer training. The safety assurance and
compliance program initiatives have identified training as a significant
systemic issue directly impacting safety. Comprehensive safety training
is an essential element of any effective railroad safety program
affecting every railroad safety craft. Despite significant efforts,
there is widespread inconsistent interpretations and understanding of
railroad safety rules and federal safety standards throughout the
industry. To reduce these misunderstandings, it is essential that the
rail work force be adequately and consistently trained. Peer training is
one possible means to achieve this goal.
Valley trains and trails .--The Committee remains interested in the
successful development of scenic passenger train service in Virginia's
Shenandoah Valley between Strasburg and New Market on track provided by
Norfolk Southern Corporation. The Committee encourages the Administrator
to continue working with the Commonwealth of Virginia, Valley Trains and
Trails, and Norfolk Southern to fund a service and financing plan for
the project.
User fees. --The Committee has denied the administration's request
to collect $66,461,000 in user fees for railroad safety activities. This
request has not been authorized. Until such authorization occurs, the
Committee will continue to fund railroad safety activities in the
traditional manner.
RAILROAD RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $22,364,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 1 21,800,000
Recommended in the bill 21,300,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -1,064,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 -500,000
\1\Of this total, $21,300,000 was to be offset from new railroad research and development user fees.
The railroad research and development appropriation finances
technical support for rail safety rulemaking and enforcement activities
and contract research activities to reduce the frequency and severity of
railroad accidents. The Committee recommends an appropriation of
$21,300,000 for fiscal year 2000, which is $500,000 less than requested.
Funding to replace or upgrade FRA's T 6 track research vehicle has been
denied. The Committee provided an appropriation for this effort in
fiscal year 1999. It is unclear why this funding is needed again in
fiscal year 2000.
The Committee has denied the request to collect $21,300,000 in user
fees from the railroad industry to fund research and development
activities. Non-federal entities have been cost-sharing with FRA on
research and development projects since at least 1995. For example,
within the track and vehicle track interaction program, the industry
contributed 40 percent of the total program costs in 1999. To impose
user fees on the same entities that are contributing research and
development funds, equipment, or expertise could greatly diminish the
benefits FRA already receives under this program. The Committee is
concerned that these new user fees would, in essence, charge the
community twice.
Railcar Weight Study.-- The Committee encourages the Federal
Railroad Administrator to conduct a study regarding the track and bridge
requirements for handling 286,000-pound rail cars. As higher capacity
286,000 rail cars are phased into the industry to increase the
railroads' productivity and improve equipment utilization there is a
need for additional information on the economic impact of handling
larger cars on light density rail lines. Recognizing that the
investments needed to upgrade a line to handle heavier cars are very
site-specific, the study should develop the unit costs that would enable
such calculations to be made. An increasing number of individual
shippers in rural areas stand to lose their rail service without this
information. Accordingly, the Committee encourages that research funds
be dedicated to such a study.
RAILROAD REHABILITATION AND IMPROVEMENT FINANCING PROGRAM
TEA21 establishes a railroad rehabilitation and improvement financing
loan and loan guarantee program. The aggregate unpaid principal amounts
of the obligations may not exceed $3.5 billion at any one time. Not less
than $1 billion is reserved for projects primarily benefiting freight
railroads other than Class I carriers. The funding may be used (1) to
acquire, improve, or rehabilitate intermodal or rail equipment or
facilities, including track, components of track bridges, yards,
buildings, or shops; (2) to refinance existing debt; or (3) to develop
and establish new intermodal or railroad facilities. No federal
appropriation is required since a non-federal infrastructure partner may
contribute the subsidy amount required by the Credit Reform Act of 1990
in the form of a credit risk premium. Once received, statutorily
established investigation charges are immediately available for
appraisals and necessary determinations and findings.
The Committee has included bill language specifying that no new
direct loans or loan guarantee commitments can be made using federal
funds for the payment of any credit premium amount during fiscal year
2000, as requested.
NEXT GENERATION HIGH-SPEED RAIL
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $20,494,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 12,000,000
Recommended in the bill 22,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +1,506,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 +10,000,000
The next generation high-speed rail program funds the development,
demonstration, and implementation of high-speed rail technologies. It is
managed in conjunction with the program authorized in TEA 21.
The Committee recommends $22,000,000 for the next generation
high-speed rail program. This is $10,000,000 more than requested. Total
program funding is allocated as follows:
Fiscal year-- Recommendation
1999 enacted 2000 request
Train control systems $4,300,000 --- $10,000,000
Non-electric locomotives 9,800,000 6,800,000 6,800,000
Grade crossings & Innovative technologies 4,600,000 4,000,000 4,000,000
Track and structures 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000
Administration 594,000 --- ---
--------------- --------------- --------------
Total 20,494,000 12,000,000 22,000,000
Train control systems. --The Committee has provided $10,000,000 for
two train control demonstration projects in the midwest. Both of these
projects are critical to the development of safe, high-speed passenger
rail service.
In the past, funding for train control projects in the states of
Illinois and Michigan has been provided under the next generation
high-speed rail account. However, for fiscal year 2000, the
administration requested that these projects be funded under a new rail
initiative account, solely funded from revenue aligned budget authority.
The Committee recommendation allocates revenue aligned budget authority
consistent with existing law.
Of the $10,000,000 appropriated for train control systems, $7,000,000
shall be provided to develop positive train control technology between
Springfield and Chicago, Illinois. This project is estimated to cost
$60,000,000, of which $22,900,000 has already been committed. The
$7,000,000 provided in this Act will be the second federal installment
of this four-year project. The Committee expects that the Association of
American Railroads and the State of Illinois will continue their
commitments to the project as well, by contributing $15,000,000 and
$6,000,000, respectively, through fiscal year 2002.
The Committee has also provided $3,000,000 for the Michigan
incremental train control project in fiscal year 2000, the last year of
federal funding for this project. According to FRA, the total cost to
complete the demonstration and to enter into daily high-speed revenue
service is $4,200,000. The state, Amtrak, and the manufacturers are
expected to contribute the remaining $1,200,000 necessary to complete
this project.
Rail-highway crossings hazard eliminations. --Under section 1103 of
TEA21, an automatic set-aside of $5,250,000 a year is made available for
the elimination of rail-highway crossing hazards. A limited number of
rail corridors are eligible for these funds. Of these set-aside funds,
$1,000,000 shall be used to mitigate grade crossing hazards along North
Carolina's sealed corridor; $1,000,000 shall be used between Washington
D.C. and Richmond, Virginia; $1,000,000 shall be used between Mobile,
Alabama and New Orleans, Louisiana; $750,000 shall be used between
Schenectady and New York City, New York; and $750,000 shall be used
along Oregon's high-speed rail corridor in Linn and Multnomah counties.
Grade crossing program.-- A general provision (sec. 337) is included
in the bill that deletes the 10 percent non-federal match for the
section 130 grade crossing program. Many states have difficulty
expending section 130 funds, and as a result, some states have several
years of unobligated balances. For example, the State of Wisconsin has
$13,033,337 in unobligated balances, which equates to approximately four
years of apportionments. Similarly the State of Oregon has $6,888,681 in
unobligated balances, which approximates three years of apportionments.
The Committee anticipates that by deleting the non-federal match, States
should be able to reduce these unobligated balances and eliminate a
greater number of grade crossing hazards than previously planned. The
table below indicates the current unobligated balances by State and
anticipated fiscal year 2000 section 130 apportionments.
State Rail/Highway Crossings
Est. FY 2000 Apportionment Unobligated as of 9/30/98
Alabama 3,220,384 2,081,282
Alaska 2,439,186 7,656,630
Arizona 1,576,081 6,110,115
Arkansas 2,457,429 2,764,038
California 10,182,716 1,336,239
Colorado 2,202,728 1,369,523
Connecticut 1,047,610 505,288
Delaware 504,776 853,836
District of Columbia 210,728 737,547
Florida 4,686,707 6,590,786
Georgia 4,696,264 7,661,114
Hawaii 391,793 783,586
Idaho 1,429,320 731,748
Illinois 7,926,261 5,798,777
Indiana 4,962,375 6,376,330
Iowa 3,795,673 2,597,008
Kansas 4,870,650 1,080,910
Kentucky 2,535,034 3,101,098
Louisiana 3,176,113 1,980,187
Maine 938,057 2,416,913
Maryland 1,427,286 2,388,232
Massachusetts 2,011,267 1,477,143
Michigan 5,352,187 4,308,852
Minnesota 4,041,936 4,616,218
Mississippi 2,240,007 989,401
Missouri 3,998,022 309,740
Montana 1,613,367 3,982,993
Nebraska 2,661,323 5,584,417
Nevada 783,990 72,978
New Hampshire 612,960 96,567
New Jersey 2,691,259 1,390,033
New Mexico 1,205,846 652,454
New York 6,020,444 2,510,910
North Carolina 3,981,325 3,994,275
North Dakota 2,242,521 538,346
Ohio 6,301,744 758,151
Oklahoma 3,300,832 171,391
Oregon 2,194,099 6,888,681
Pennsylvania 5,804,391 1,085,639
Rhode Island 445,013 776,895
South Carolina 2,584,926 1,306,066
South Dakota 1,654,832 3,803,916
Tennessee 3,267,384 1,495,863
Texas 10,906,280 5,771,981
Utah 1,152,999 2,936,055
Vermont 618,631 3,962,126
Virginia 2,731,204 2,448,246
Washington 2,717,360 6,852,891
West Virginia 1,708,309 896,187
Wisconsin 3,929,021 13,033,337
Wyoming 912,318 343,914
---------------------------- ---------------------------
FRA and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) shall work with the
states to identify the ten most deadly crossings in each state and
identify ways in which those crossings could be closed or reconfigured
to reduce or mitigate the inherent dangers. The Committee believes that
focusing on the most dangerous crossings in each state will greatly
reduce the likelihood of fatal accidents. FRA and FHWA shall identify
those crossings and the mitigations under consideration in a report to
the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations by May 1, 2000.
RHODE ISLAND RAIL DEVELOPMENT
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $5,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 10,000,000
Recommended in the bill 10,000,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +5,000,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 ---
The Rhode Island rail development project will construct a third
track along portions of the Northeast Corridor between Davisville and
Central Falls, Rhode Island. This third track will prevent mixing
freight and high-speed passenger rail service and will provide
sufficient clearance to accommodate double-stack freight cars.
The Committee has provided $10,000,000 for the Rhode Island rail
development project, as requested. Between fiscal years 1995 and 1999, a
total of $28,000,000 in federal funds was appropriated to construct a
third track. Of this total, $23,000,000 remains available for
obligation. This funding is matched on a dollar-for-dollar basis by the
state.
The state has been slow to obligate previously appropriated funds.
Although the state plans to begin the construction phase of the project
in the spring of 1999, there has yet to be an increase in expenditures
for the project. Currently the state is projecting a federal cash
expenditure of $20,500,000 in fiscal year 2000, which is within the
unobligated balances. Should the state accelerate construction on this
project, additional funding will be available at the $10,000,000 level
for this work in fiscal year 2000.
GRANTS TO THE NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $609,230,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 570,976,000
Recommended in the bill 570,976,000
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 -38,254,000
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 (---)
The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is a
private/public corporation created by the Rail Passenger Service Act of
1970 and incorporated under the laws of the District of Columbia to
operate a national rail passenger system. Amtrak started operation on
May 1, 1971.
STATUS OF AMTRAK
Over the past four years, Amtrak has undergone a remarkable change.
Escalating expenses had been widening the gap between total revenues and
expenses to such a point that Amtrak was concerned that it would not be
able to borrow enough to cover these costs. Only two years ago, the
President of Amtrak was discussing the possibility of bankruptcy. Within
the last few years, Amtrak has been able to turn these numbers around.
In 1998, it achieved record passenger revenues, topping $1 billion, and
the largest ridership increase (4.5 percent) in a decade. Also, expenses
were less than projected.
In March, the Committee heard testimony from Amtrak, the Federal
Railroad Administration, and the Department of Transportation's
Inspector General about Amtrak's ability to achieve operational
self-sufficiency. All three testified that, while possible, it would be
difficult. For example, the Inspector General (IG) stated, ``overall
assessment [of Amtrak] is that with strong leadership, intense
management, and continued favorable economic conditions, it will be
possible--albeit difficult--for Amtrak to meet its Congressional mandate
to become operationally self-sufficient by 2003.''
To meet operational self-sufficiency, a number of crucial items must
occur. These include: (1) enacting high-speed rail on a timely basis on
the Northeast Corridor, (2) increasing capital investments, (3) meeting
growth targets in the Intercity and on the West Coast, (4) completing
the market-based network analysis and implementing its results, and (5)
continuing to grow mail and express opportunities.
The first key element to reaching operating self-sufficiency by 2003
will be Amtrak's ability to implement its high-speed rail program
between New York and Boston at the beginning of fiscal year 2000. Amtrak
and the IG testified that revenue from this new service is key to
reaching self-sufficiency. The high-speed rail program has experienced
repeated delays and is on a very tight schedule. In March 1999, full
system testing was scheduled for October, the same month that
electrified service was scheduled to begin. More recently, Amtrak has
stated that high-speed rail service will begin in November or December,
yet another delay in the program.
The second key element is for Amtrak to realize additional capital
investments between fiscal years 2000 and 2003. The IG testified that
while ``there is a good chance that Amtrak will be able to sustain
operating self-sufficiency beyond 2002 . . . because of revenues from
the Northeast Corridor . . . a caveat to this statement is needed.'' The
IG estimated that Amtrak's ``minimum capital investment level is $2.7
billion, which is $125,000,000 per year more than current projected
federal appropriations. This minimum level would be enough to keep
Amtrak operating in a steady state through 2003, but would make Amtrak
vulnerable to equipment deterioration and schedule reliability problems
after that date. If Amtrak cannot continue to invest in its capital
needs at a sustainable level ($3 billion), this could negatively impact
its reliability and its ability to maintain operational
self-sufficiency''.
Third, operational self-sufficiency depends on continued growth in
the Intercity and West Coast passenger revenues. The IG's November
assessment of Amtrak's financial needs through fiscal year 2002,
concluded both the Intercity and West Coast revenue estimates were
overly optimistic. In addition, states must continue to support state
services. It has come to the Committee's attention that certain states
in these two business units may be reluctant to support their Amtrak
services to the same level as in previous years, which may precipitate
Amtrak to raise fares faster than anticipated in those areas, causing a
decrease in ridership and passenger revenues to flatten or decline. This
could be detrimental to Amtrak's self-sufficiency.
Fourth, Amtrak is undertaking a market-based network analysis that
will help the railroad determine where adjustments are needed in the
system. As part of this analysis, Amtrak must consider a full range of
options, including route elimination and rationalization. Once the
analysis is completed, Amtrak must have the fortitude to undertake the
adjustments necessary to increase revenues and decrease expenses;
however, without considering route elimination, the railroad may not
have the capital necessary (e.g. locomotives, express cars, etc.) to
assure the long-term success of these adjustments.
Fifth, with the recent Surface Transportation Board ruling that
allows Amtrak to operate express service with some limitation, Amtrak
has an opportunity to increase its revenues. For the first five months
of this year, express revenues increased 500 percent. In total, Amtrak
hopes to collect $138,000,000 from the expansion of mail and express
services by 2002. Results to date make this a promising possibility.
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION
The budget request sought $570,976,000 in capital funds and an
expanded definition of ``capital'' to allow use of the capital
appropriation for preventive maintenance. This level is the third
installment of a five-year, $5 billion plan to re-energize and
recapitalize Amtrak. The Committee recommendation fully funds this
request.
Expanded capital definition .--The Administration and Amtrak
requested a more flexible definition of the term ``capital'' arguing
that Amtrak should be able to use its federal capital appropriations on
maintenance of equipment, infrastructure, and facilities. Amtrak has
indicated that as much as $481,000,000 of the requested $570,976,000 may
pay for preventive maintenance activities. Specifically, $304,000,000 is
necessary for maintenance of equipment and $177,000,000 is needed for
maintenance of way. The remainder will be used for long-term capital
investments and debt service.
With the passage of the Taxpayer Relief Act (TRA) and Department of
Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999, Amtrak was
permitted to use its TRA funds and its capital grant appropriation to
finance maintenance of equipment. In 1999, this equated to $353,000,000.
Amtrak's fiscal year 2000 grant request states that if the expanded
definition ``were not provided, Amtrak will not be able to remain on the
glidepath to operational self-sufficiency, nor will the corporation make
it, on a cash basis, through fiscal year 2000.'' In the Committee
hearing on Amtrak's viability, the Inspector General concurred noting,
``if Amtrak does not receive the expanded capital definition, it will
not be able to cover its operating losses and could be forced to default
on current obligations. This could occur even though Amtrak is likely to
have $1 billion in Taxpayer Relief Act (TRA) funds in the bank''.
Because TRA and the 1999 appropriations Act permitted Amtrak to use its
capital funding for maintenance of equipment only, when Amtrak's annual
federal appropriation is used to fully fund the maintenance of
equipment, no TRA funds can legally be used to cover additional
operating expenses. Amtrak estimates that this shortfall will be
$47,000,000.
Amtrak, the Administration, and the Inspector General all support
greater flexibility. Restricting Amtrak's permissible uses for its
federal appropriation in fiscal year 2000 would be shortsighted. It
could force Amtrak to default on its current obligations at a time when
many are cautiously optimistic that the railroad may become
operationally self-sufficient two years later. The Committee concurs and
approves the request of Amtrak and the Administration to use Amtrak's
capital appropriations for preventive maintenance.
Bill language .--The Committee has included bill language that
prohibits Amtrak from obligating more than $228,400,000 prior to
September 30, 2000. Last year, Amtrak's Board of Directors agreed to
hold its capital expenditures to 40 percent. At the time the Board made
this commitment, Amtrak hoped to use the expanded capital definition to
cover what had previously been defined as operating costs, such as
maintenance of equipment and way without increasing the spend-out rate
for its capital programs. Since the Committee has permitted Amtrak to
use capital appropriations for previously defined operating expenses in
fiscal year 2000, the Committee must continue to hold Amtrak to the 40
percent obligation limitation that the Board adopted last year.
Fencing along the Northeast Corridor .--The Committee recognizes
that Amtrak has made progress in enhancing safety along the tracks where
high-speed rail will be operating. Amtrak should continue to work
closely with northeast corridor communities, as well as state transit
officials and owners of the track, to identify dangerous locations and
install perimeter fencing along the Corridor, wherever needed. In
particular, Amtrak should continue to focus on increased community
coordination in urbanized areas where there have been problems or
community concerns have been expressed, such as near Attleboro, Foxboro,
Mansfield, and Sharon, Massachusetts. Amtrak should ensure that fencing
improvements for these areas is completed before high-speed rail is
operational.
Beech Grove maintenance facility .--The Committee recognizes that
Amtrak's heavy overhaul facility in Beech Grove, Indiana is in need of
capital investment. The Committee is also aware that Amtrak's investment
needs are greater than its available funds. Amtrak shall submit a report
to the Committee within 90 days of enactment of this Act, detailing its
plans, including a proposed timeline and a list of priorities, for
capital improvements at its Beech Grove facility, should capital funds
be available.
RAIL INITIATIVES
(Liquidation of Contract Authorization)
(Highway Trust Fund)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 ---
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 $35,400,000
Recommended in the bill ---
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 ---
Budget estimate, fiscal year 2000 -35,400,000
The Administration has proposed a new rail initiative program that
would be funded from revenue aligned budget authority. This new program
would fund three rail initiatives: grade crossings in high-speed rail
corridors ($15,000,000), two train control systems ($10,000,000), and a
nationwide differential global positioning system ($10,400,000).
Funding for the rail initiatives under this new account structure has
been denied. The Committee opposes altering the distribution of revenue
aligned budget authority to any program outside of those authorized
under TEA21. The rail initiative is one of many diversions proposed by
the administration, which propose higher spending levels contingent upon
passage of legislation and user fees that the administration knows are
highly unlikely.
The Committee has deferred consideration of further increases in
funding for grade crossings beyond those guaranteed levels contained in
TEA21 and available through the highway formula, until the Committee
sees the results of a general provision deleting the 10 percent
non-federal match required for the section 130 hazard elimination
program. This program provides roughly $155,000,000 per year to the
states. Eliminating the non-federal match should allow states to address
grade crossing hazards on a more expeditious basis and defer any current
requirements for additional resources.
The Committee has provided $10,000,000 in the next generation
high-speed rail account to fund two positive train control demonstration
projects in the states of Illinois and Michigan. The Committee has
funded these two projects for several years which are a key component of
a partnership forged by Amtrak, FRA and nine midwestern States to bring
high-speed rail to Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota,
Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, and Wisconsin, as part of the midwest regional
rail initiative.
The Committee has denied any funding for the nationwide differential
global positioning system (-$10,400,000). Seventeen federal agencies and
private entities will be the beneficiaries of this system. Last year,
the department stated that these agencies, particularly Agriculture,
would be the primary beneficiaries of this information. Since the
Department of Transportation is not the principal beneficiary, the
Committee believes that it should not be the only source of funding for
this system in fiscal year 2000 or beyond. Last year, the Committee
urged the department to finalize plans to collect contributions for this
network from the other federal agencies and private sources to fund the
conversion of GWEN sites to a DGPS network and to provide such a
proposal to the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations. This
report has not been delivered to the committees yet.
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION
SUMMARY OF FISCAL YEAR 2000 PROGRAM
The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) was established as a
component of the Department of Transportation on July 1, 1968, when most
of the functions and programs under the Federal Transit Act (78 Stat.
302; 49 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) were transferred from the Department of
Housing and Urban Development. Known as the Urban Mass Transportation
Administration until enactment of the Intermodal Surface Transportation
Efficiency Act of 1991, the Federal Transit Administration administers
federal financial assistance programs for planning, developing and
improving comprehensive mass transportation systems in both urban and
non-urban areas.
Much of the funding for the Federal Transit Administration is
provided by annual limitations on obligations provided in appropriations
Acts. However, direct appropriations are required for every accounts.
The current authorization for the programs funded by the Federal
Transit Administration is contained in the Transportation Equity Act for
the 21st Century (TEA21). TEA21 also amended the Budget Enforcement Act
to provide two additional discretionary spending categories, the highway
category and the mass transit category. The mass transit category is
comprised of transit formula grants, transit capital, investments
funding, Federal Transit Administration administrative expenses, transit
planning and research, job access and reverse commute grants, and
university transportation research center funding. The mass transit
category obligations are capped at $5,797,000,000 and outlays are capped
at $4,761,000,000 in fiscal year 2000. Any additional appropriated
funding above the levels specified as guaranteed for each transit
program in TEA21 (that which could be appropriated from general funds
authorized under section 5338(h)) is scored against the non-defense
discretionary category.
The total funding provided for FTA for fiscal year 2000 is
$5,797,000,000, including $1,159,000,000 direct appropriations and
$4,638,000,000 limitations on contract authority. The total recommended
is $407,000,000 over the 1999 enacted level, $291,270,000 below the
fiscal year 2000 budget request, and the same level as guaranteed in
TEA21. The following table summarizes the fiscal year 1999 program
levels, the fiscal year 2000 budget request, and the fiscal year 2000
program levels:
Program 1999 enacted 2000 request Recommended in the bill
Administrative expenses $54,000,000 $60,000,000 $60,000,000
Formula grants\1\ 2,850,000,000 3,310,270,000 3,098,000,000
University transportation research 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000
Transit planning and research\1\ 98,000,000 111,000,000 107,000,000
Capital investment grants 2,257,000,000 2,451,000,000 2,451,000,000
Job access and reverse commute grants\1\ 75,000,000 150,000,000 75,000,000
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 50,000,000 --- ---
---------------- ---------------- ---------------------------
\1\The budget request included a proposal to transfer a total of $291,270,000 in obligational authority resulting from revenue aligned budget authority, of which $212,270,000 was to be transferred to formula grants; $4,000,000 to the national program of the transit planning and research account; and $75,000,000 to the job access and reverse commute grants program.
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Appropriation (General fund) Limitation on obligations (Trust fund)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999\1\ $10,800,000 ($43,200,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 12,000,000 (48,000,000)
Recommended in the bill 12,000,000 (48,000,000)
xlBill compared to:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +1,200,000 (+4,800,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 --- (---)
\1\Excludes reductions of $912,000 for TASC.
The bill provides a total appropriation of $60,000,000 for FTA's
salaries and expenses. The recommendation is $6,000,000 above the 1999
enacted level and the same level as the budget request. This
appropriation is guaranteed under the transit funding category. The
recommended appropriation of $60,000,000 is comprised of an
appropriation of $12,000,000 from the general fund and $48,000,000 from
limitations on obligations from the mass transit account of the highway
trust fund.
Full-time equivalent (FTE) staff years .--The Committee observes
that TEA21 has imposed additional duties on the FTA and approves the
budget request to increase staffing at the FTA by 10 FTE. The Committee
directs that the FTE level in fiscal year 2000 not rise in excess of 495
FTE.
Information technology activities.--The Committee recommendation
deletes funds for the human resources information system (-$200,000) as
systems development is premature. Further discussion is included under
the appropriation for the office of the assistant secretary for
administration in the office of the secretary.
In addition, the Committee has deferred consideration of several
information technology activities (-$2,500,000), since the FTA is unable
to inform the Committee of the out-year financial requirements to
complete systems review, development and acquisition. Funding for
development of several new major information technology systems cannot
be fully justified until such time as future annual and total costs for
such systems are fully developed and submitted to the Committee for
consideration. The Committee will reconsider the request for information
technology activities when FTA submits complete cost estimates. The
Committee encourages the FTA to submit such documentation and
justification before final consideration of the fiscal year 2000
Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act.
Project management oversight activities.--The Committee directs the
FTA to increase its financial management oversight activities within the
funds provided under the project management oversight program, section
23. The Committee believes it is imperative that the FTA understand more
fully the financing proposals of major transit projects authorized in
TEA21 before entering into full funding grant agreements and to identify
critical funding deficiencies or inadequate financing plans before such
funding shortfalls materialize. The experience to date with several
projects in FTA's current portfolio suggests a more aggressive approach
by the FTA is needed. The Committee directs that not less than
$4,500,000 shall be available in fiscal year 2000 for the conduct of
such financial management oversight reviews.
The Committee has included bill language requiring the FTA to
transfer to the Inspector General $800,000 for reimbursement of audits
and reviews of major transit projects, continuing a provision contained
in the fiscal year 1999 Department of Transportation and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act. Over the past several years, the IG has
provided critical oversight of several major transit projects, which the
Committee has found invaluable. The Committee anticipates that such
oversight activities will be continued by the Inspector General in
fiscal year 2000.
Full funding grant agreements (FFGAs).--The Committee observes that
cost increases on several projects with existing FFGAs suggest that the
FFGAs for those projects may have been executed too early during the
conceptual design phase. As a result, the project's scope and design
were not substantially complete and total costs to construct the project
were not reliably identified at the time the full funding grant
agreement was executed. To more fully anticipate the federal and local
financial requirements necessary to undertake such large transportation
investments, the FTA is directed not to execute any full funding grant
agreements for projects that have not completed at least eighty percent
of the design phase.
The FTA is directed to notify in writing the House and Senate
Committees on Appropriations not later than 60 days before issuing a new
full funding grant agreement. Such correspondence shall include: (1) a
copy of the proposed FFGA; (2) the total and annual federal
appropriations required for the project; (3) yearly and total federal
appropriations that can be reasonably planned or anticipated for future
FFGAs for each fiscal year through 2003; and (4) a detailed analysis of
annual commitments for current and anticipated FFGAs against the program
authorization. The Committee further directs that such correspondence
include a financial analysis of the project's cost and sponsor's ability
to finance, which shall be conducted by an independent examiner. This
independent evaluation shall contain pertinent information, including an
assessment of the capital cost estimate and the finance plan; the source
and security of all public- and private-sector financial instruments;
the project's operating plan which enumerates the project's future
revenue and ridership forecasts; and planned contingencies and risks
associated with the project.
The Committee directs the FTA to be judicious in the development and
execution of new full funding grant agreements in fiscal year 2000 in
order to preserve a sufficient level of new starts contract authority to
allow other new fixed guideway projects to participate in the capital
new starts program during the balance of the TEA21 authorization period.
FORMULA GRANTS
Appropriation (General fund) Limitation on obligations (Trust fund)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $570,000,000 ($2,280,000,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ 619,600,000 (2,690,670,000)
Recommended in the bill 619,600,000 (2,478,400,000)
xlBill compared to:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +49,600,000 (+198,400,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 (-212,270,000)
\1\Includes $212,270,000 in obligations proposed to be transferred from revenue aligned budget authority.
The accompanying bill provides a total of $3,098,000,000 for transit
formula grants. This level is $248,000,000 above the fiscal year 1999
enacted level of $2,850,000,000 and is guaranteed under the transit
category.
The recommended program level of $3,098,000,000 is comprised of an
appropriation of $619,600,000 from the general fund and $2,478,400,000
from limitations on obligations from the mass transit account of the
highway trust fund. Formula grants to states and local agencies funded
under this heading fall into four categories: urbanized area formula
grants (U.S.C. sec. 5307); clean fuels formula grants (U.S.C. sec.
5308); formula grants and loans for special needs of elderly individuals
and individuals with disabilities (U.S.C. sec. 5310); and formula grants
for other than urbanized areas (U.S.C. sec. 5311). In addition, set
asides of formula funds are directed to a grant program for intercity
bus operators to finance Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
accessibility costs and the Alaska Railroad for improvements to its
passenger operations.
Within the total funding level of $3,098,000,000, the new statutory
distribution of formula grants is allocated among the following
activities:
Urbanized areas (sec. 5307) $2,772,890,281
Clean fuels (sec. 5308) 50,000,000
Elderly and disabled (sec. 5310) 72,946,801
Non-urbanized areas (sec. 5311) 193,612,968
Rural transportation accessibility incentive program 3,700,000
Alaska Railroad 4,849,950
Section 3007 of TEA21 amends U.S.C. 5307, urbanized formula grants,
by striking the authorization to utilize these funds for operating
costs, but includes a specific provision allowing the Secretary to make
operating grants to urbanized areas with a population of less than
200,000. Generally, these grants may be used to fund capital projects,
and to finance planning and preventive maintenance of equipment,
facilities, and vehicles used in mass transportation. All urbanized
areas greater than 200,000 in population are statutorily required to use
one percent of their annual formula grants on enhancements, which
include landscaping, public art, bicycle storage, and connections to
parks.
Major project preliminary engineering and design (PE&D).--The
accompanying bill provides appreciable increases in formula funds
allocated to transit authorities. These funds can be used, among other
activities, for preliminary engineering and design of new rail
extensions or busways. The Committee asserts that local project sponsors
of new rail extensions or busways should use these funds for PE&D
activities rather than seek section 5309 discretionary set-asides. The
numerous authorizations for new fixed guideway projects contained in
TEA21 and the limited funding available annually for preliminary
engineering and design of such new systems will necessitate local
sponsors to use their formula apportionment and other local funds for
preliminary engineering and design activities. Moreover, the Committee
expects the FTA, when evaluating the local financial commitment of a
given project, to consider the extent to which the project's sponsors
have used the appreciable increases in the formula grants apportionments
for preliminary engineering and design activities of proposed new
systems.
Clean fuels program. --TEA21 requires that $50,000,000 be set aside
from funds made available under the formula grants program to fund a new
clean fuels program. The clean fuels program is supplemented by an
additional set-aside from the major capital investment's bus program and
provides grants for the purchase or lease of clean fuel buses for
eligible recipients in areas that are not in compliance with air quality
attainment standards. The Committee has identified designated recipients
of these funds within the projects listed under the bus program of the
capital investment grants account.
Requested set-asides. --The Committee has not earmarked funding
requested for several projects from amounts made available for the
section 5307 formula program. The budget proposed to set aside
$20,000,000 for the Long Island East Side Access project; $25,000,000
for Salt Lake City 2002 Winter Olympic Games transportation-related
activities; and a total of $5,000,000 (of which $3,700,000 is guaranteed
and $1,300,000 is derived from revenue aligned budget authority) for the
over-the-road accessibility program. These set-asides were to be derived
from additional budget resources transferred to the section 5307 formula
program from revenue aligned budget authority. The Committee has not
approved the transfer of revenue aligned budget authority and therefore
additional resources above the guaranteed level are not available for
these specific purposes.
The following table displays the state-by-state distribution of the
formula funds within each of the program categories:
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
[Graphic Image Not Available]
UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH
Appropriation (General fund) Limitation on obligations (Trust fund)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $1,200,000 ($4,800,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 1,200,000 (4,800,000)
Recommended in the bill 1,200,000 (4,800,000)
xlBill compared to:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 --- (---)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 --- (---)
The accompanying bill provides a total of $6,000,000 for university
transportation research. The recommendation is the same level as
provided in fiscal year 1999. This appropriation is guaranteed under the
transit funding category.
The recommended program level of $6,000,000 is comprised of an
appropriation of $1,200,000 from the general fund and $4,800,000 from
limitations on obligations from the mass transit account of the highway
trust fund.
TRANSIT PLANNING AND RESEARCH
Appropriation (General fund) Limitation on obligations (Trust fund)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $19,800,000 ($78,200,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000\1\ 21,000,000 (90,000,000)
Recommended in the bill 21,000,000 (86,000,000)
xlBill compared to:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 +1,200,000 (+7,800,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 -- (-4,000,000)
\1\Includes $4,000,000 in obligations proposed to be transferred from revenue aligned budget authority.
The accompanying bill provides a total of $107,000,000 for transit
planning and research. The recommendation is $9,000,000 more than
provided in fiscal year 1999 and $4,000,000 less than the budget
request. This appropriation is guaranteed under the transit funding
category. The Committee has not approved an additional $4,000,000 in
obligations for the national program to be derived from revenue aligned
budget authority.
The recommended program level of $107,000,000 is comprised of an
appropriation of $21,000,000 from the general fund and $86,000,000 from
limitations on obligations from the mass transit account of the highway
trust fund.
The bill contains language specifying that $49,632,000 shall be
available for metropolitan planning; $10,368,000 shall be available for
state planning; $29,500,000 shall be available for national planning and
research; $8,250,000 shall be available for transit cooperative
research; $4,000,000 shall be available for the National Transit
Institute; and $5,250,000 shall be available for rural transportation
assistance.
TEA21 earmarks the following projects within the funds provided for
the national program in fiscal year 2000:
Washoe County, Nevada transit technology $1,250,000
MBTA, Massachusetts advanced electric transit buses and related infrastructure 1,500,000
Palm Springs, California fuel cell buses 1,000,000
Gloucester, Massachusetts intermodal technology center 1,500,000
SEPTA, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania advanced propulsion control system (TEA21) 3,000,000
Project ACTION 3,000,000
Support in fiscal year 2000 is provided for a number of important
initiatives including:
Advanced transportation and alternative fueled vehicle technology consortium $2,750,000
Safety and security programs 5,450,000
International program 1,000,000
Santa Barbara Electric Transit Institute 1,750,000
Hennepin County community transportation, Minnesota 1,000,000
Pittsfield economic development authority electric bus program 1,500,000
Independent transportation network, Portland, Maine 500,000
Citizens for Modern Transit, Missouri 300,000
In addition, the FTA is directed to undertake a project, in
partnership with the transit industry, to identify the common accident
causal factors, how to collect data on those factors, and how such
information collection might be incorporated into the National Transit
Database safety data collection process. Such an effort shall address
the concerns raised by the National Transportation Safety Board. The
recommendation also includes sufficient funding to conduct an assessment
of the benefits of new transit investments compared with investments to
maintaining existing infrastructure. To offset funding necessary for
these activities, the Committee has deleted funding for several low
priority activities, including $200,000 for an information data outreach
project.
Fuel cell bus program. --The Committee directs that none of the
funds available under this heading shall be available to supplement
funding provided under section 3015(b) of TEA21 for the fuel cell bus
and bus facilities program. To the extent that supplemental funding is
believed necessary above the $29,100,000 provided in TEA21, the
Committee directs the FTA and Georgetown University to obtain additional
funding support from transit agencies that have expressed interest in
fuel cell transit buses and other corporate sponsors to finance such
perceived program shortfalls.
Advanced transportation and alternative fueled vehicle. --The
Committee has included $2,750,000 for the advanced transportation and
alternative fueled vehicle program. Within the funds provided, $500,000
shall be made available to WESTART and $2,250,000 shall be made
available to CALSTART.
The Committee has deleted funds for several lower priority
activities, including $200,000 for an information data outreach project.
Within the funds provided for safety activities, the FTA is directed
to undertake a project, in partnership with the transit industry, to
identify the common accident causal factors, how to collect data on
those factors, and how much information collection might be incorporated
into the National Transit Database safety collection process. Such an
effort shall address the concerns raised by the National Transportation
Safety Board.
The FTA is further directed to conduct an assessment of the benefits
of new transit investments compared with investments to maintaining
existing infrastructure.
TRUST FUND SHARE OF EXPENSES
(HIGHWAY TRUST FUND)
(LIQUIDATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORIZATION)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 ($4,251,800,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 (4,929,270,000)
Recommended in the bill (4,638,000,000)
xlBill compared with:
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 (+386,200,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 (-291,270,000)
For fiscal year 2000, the Committee has provided $4,638,000,000 for
liquidation of contract authorization. The increase over last year is
necessary to pay outstanding obligations of the various transit programs
at the levels contained in TEA21. This appropriation is mandatory and
has no scoring effect.
CAPITAL INVESTMENT GRANTS
Appropriation (General fund) Limitation on obligations (Trust fund)
Appropriation, fiscal year 1999 $451,400,000 ($1,805,600,000)
Budget request, fiscal year 2000 490,200,000 (1,960,800,000)
Recommended in the bill 490,200,000 (1,960,800,000)
xlBill compared to: +38,800,000 +155,200,000
The accompanying bill provides a total of $2,451,000,000 to be
available for capital investment grants. The recommendation is
$194,000,000 more than provided in fiscal year 1999 and the same level
as the budget request. This appropriation is guaranteed under the
transit category.
The recommended program level of $2,451,000,000 is comprised of an
appropriation of $490,200,000 from the general fund and $1,960,800,000
from limitations on obligations from the mass transit account of the
highway trust fund.
Funds provided for capital investment grants shall be distributed as
follows:
1999 enacted 2000 request Recommended in the bill
Fixed guideway modernization $902,800,000 $980,400,000 $980,400,000
New starts 902,800,000 980,400,000 980,400,000
Bus and bus facilities 451,400,000 490,200,000 490,200,000
--------------- --------------- ---------------------------
Three-year availability of section 5309 funds. --The Committee has
included bill language that permits the administrator to reallocate
discretionary new start and buses and bus facilities funds from projects
which remain unobligated after three years. Funds made available in the
fiscal year 1997 Department of Transportation and Related Agencies
Appropriations Act and previous Acts are available for reallocation in
fiscal year 2000 as availability for these discretionary projects is
limited to three years. The Committee directs the FTA to reprogram funds
from recoveries and previous appropriations that remain available after
three years and are available for reallocation to only those section 3
new starts that have full funding grant agreements in place on the date
of enactment of this Act, and with respect to bus and bus facilities,
only to those bus and bus facilities projects identified in the
accompanying reports of the fiscal year 2000 Department of
Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act. The FTA shall
notify the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations 15 business
days prior to any such reallocation, consistent with the department's
reprogramming guidelines.
The Committee, however, directs the FTA not to reallocate funds
provided in the fiscal year 1997 Department of Transportation and
Related Agencies Appropriations Act for the Houston regional bus plan,
the New Orleans Streetcar project, the Buffalo intermodal center, and
the Jackson, Mississippi intermodal corridor and bus projects. The FTA
informs the Committee that these funds are likely to be awarded in the
fourth quarter of fiscal year 1999 or soon thereafter.
BUSES AND BUS FACILITIES
The accompanying bill provides $490,200,000 for bus purchases and bus
facilities, including maintenance garages and intermodal facilities. Bus
systems are expected to play a vital role in the mass transportation
systems of virtually all cities. FTA estimates that 95 percent of the
areas that provide mass transit service do so through bus transit only
and over 60 percent of all transit passenger trips are provided by bus.
TEA21 requires that funding of $100,000,000 be made available for a
new clean fuels grant program. This funding is derived from $50,000,000
from the formula grants account and $50,000,000 from funds allocated for
buses under this account. Designated recipients of the clean fuels grant
program--funding for which is derived in part from the formula grants
program--are identified in the lists below (to the extent funding is
allocated for the purchase of eligible alternative-fuel vehicles,
related facilities and other eligible activities).
TEA21 requires that the funds provided for buses and bus facilities
be allocated as follows:
State and project Amount
State of Alabama: Birmingham-Jefferson County buses $1,250,000
State of Arkansas: 2,000,000
State of California: 1,250,000
State of Colorado: 625,000
State of Connecticut: 2,250,000
District of Columbia: Washington, D.C. intermodal transportation center 2,500,000
State of Florida: 2,500,000
State of Georgia: Atlanta MARTA buses 13,500,000
State of Hawaii: Honolulu bus facility and buses 2,250,000
State of Iowa: 885,000
State of Illinois: statewide buses and bus-related equipment 8,200,000
State of Indiana: 1,250,000
Commonwealth of Massachusetts: 1,250,000
State of Maryland: statewide bus facilities and buses 11,500,000
State of Michigan: statewide buses 13,500,000
State of Minnesota: 1,000,000
State of Missouri: St. Louis Bi-state Intermodal Center 1,250,000
State of North Carolina: 3,339,000
State of New Jersey: 1,750,000
State of New Mexico: 1,250,000
State of New York: 1,250,000
State of Ohio: 625,000
State of Oklahoma: statewide bus facilities and buses 5,000,000
State of Oregon: 4,400,000
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: 1,500,000
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico: San Juan intermodal access 600,000
State of Rhode Island: Providence buses and bus maintenance facility 3,294,000
State of South Carolina: statewide Virtual Transit Enterprise 1,220,000
State of South Dakota: statewide bus facilities and buses 1,500,000
State of Texas: 1,250,000
State of Utah: 800,000
Commonwealth of Virginia: 1,000,000
State of Washington: 1,950,000
State of Wisconsin: 6,000,000
State of West Virginia: 12,000,000
Other legislated set-asides: 3,000,000
In addition, federal support is provided for the following projects:
State and Project Amount
State of Alabama: $500,000
State of Arizona: 1,000,000
State of California: 80,000
State of Delaware: 1,000,000
State of Florida: 1,000,000
State of Georgia: 7,000,000
State of Iowa: 3,000,000
State of Indiana: 3,500,000
State of Kansas: 700,000
State of Kentucky: 2,000,000
State of Louisiana: 10,000,000
Commonwealth of Massachusetts: 1,000,000
State of Michigan: 9,713,000
State of Minnesota: 16,000,000
State of Missouri: 2,500,000
State of Mississippi: 200,000
State of Montana: 1,200,000
State of North Dakota: 1,000,000
State of Nebraska: 1,000,000
State of New Mexico: 4,000,000
State of New York: 2,250,000
State of North Carolina: 4,884,000
State of Ohio: 15,000,000
State of Oregon: 1,000,000
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: 2,000,000
State of South Carolina: 5,800,000
State of Tennessee: 7,000,000
State of Texas: 1,000,000
State of Virginia: 14,750,000
State of Washington: 1,500,000
State of Wisconsin: 5,000,000
State of West Virginia: 2,200,000
Detroit, Michigan .--The Committee recommendation includes a total
of $10,000,000 for buses and bus related facilities in Detroit,
Michigan. Of this amount, $287,000 shall be used solely for the
improvement of the EZ ride transportation program, which provides
transportation in Detroit for senior citizens who are unable to use
traditional forms of bus transit.
FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION
The accompanying bill provides $980,400,000 from the capital
investment grants program to modernize existing rail transit systems.
These funds are to be redistributed, consistent with the provisions of
TEA21, shown below.
SECTION 5309 FIXED GUDEWAY MODERNIZATION APPRORTIONMENTS
STATE Fiscal year--
1999 2000 Change from 1999
Arizona $1,276,627 $1,714,915 $438,288
California 86,293,374 97,447,440 11,154,066
Colorado 1,072,768 1,276,142 203,374
Connecticut 34,538,688 35,613,122 1,074,434
Delaware 661,929 900,963 239,034
District of Columbia 31,797,959 41,405,152 9,607,193
Forida 11,011,678 14,894,671 3,882,993
Georgia 14,855,414 20,056,733 5,201,319
Hawaii 528,313 717,140 188,827
Illinois 105,900,396 109,835,226 3,934,830
Indiana 7,108,243 7,372,357 264,114
Louisiana 2,305,868 2,719,194 413,326
Maryland 19,801,081 21,651,851 1,850,770
Massachusetts 59,763,228 63,230,944 3,467,716
Michigan 318,620 449,343 130,723
Minnesota 2,433,932 2,844,835 410,903
Missouri 1,516,420 1,632,113 115,693
New Jersey 81,715,296 87,109,545 5,394,249
New York 301,682,929 320,395,319 18,712,390
Ohio 14,805,733 16,007,175 1,201,442
Pennsylvania 93,529,903 95,594,209 2,064,306
Puerto Rico 1,326,488 1,777,215 450,727
Oregon 2,267,470 3,059,860 792,390
Rhode Island 1,800,384 2,412,069 611,865
Tennessee 58,594 79,754 21,160
Texas 4,455,080 5,696,889 1,241,809
Virginia 464,097 464,097 0
Washington 12,227,786 15,992,245 3,764,459
Wisconsin 510,702 696,482 185,780
------------- ------------- ------------------
\3/4\ percent oversight 6,771,000 7,353,000 582,000
============= ============= ==================
NEW STARTS
The accompanying bill provides $980,400,000 of new authority for new
starts. These funds are available for preliminary engineering,
right-of-way acquisition, project management, oversight, and
construction of new systems and extensions. TEA21 requires that no more
than eight percent of the funding provided for new starts be available
for preliminary engineering and design activities. The funds are to be
distributed as follows:
Project
Amount
Alaska or Hawaii ferry projects $10,400,000
Atlanta, Georgia, North line extension project 45,142,000
Baltimore central LRT double track project 5,000,000
Canton-Akron-Cleveland commuter rail project 4,000,000
Charlotte, North Carolina, north-south corridor transitway project 3,000,000
Chicago METRA commuter rail project 25,000,000
Chicago Transit Authority Douglas branch line project 2,000,000
Chicago Transit Authority Ravenswood branch line project 2,000,000
Cincinnati northeast/northern Kentucky corridor project 2,000,000
Clark County, Nevada, fixed guideway project 2,000,000
Cleveland Euclid corridor improvement project 1,000,000
Colorado Roaring Fork Valley project 1,000,000
Dallas north central light rail extension project 35,000,000
Dayton, Ohio, light rail study 1,000,000
Denver Southwest corridor project 35,000,000
Dulles corridor project 25,000,000
Fort Lauderdale, Florida Tri-County commuter rail project 12,000,000
Houston advanced transit program 4,000,000
Houston regional bus project 52,770,000
Johnson County, Kansas, I 35 commuter rail project 1,000,000
Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee rail extension project 1,000,000
Long Island Railroad East Side access project 4,000,000
Los Angeles Mid-City and East Side corridors projects 5,000,000
Los Angeles North Hollywood extension project 50,000,000
Los Angeles-San Diego LOSSAN corridor project 1,000,000
MARC commuter rail project 703,000
Massachusetts North Shore corridor project 1,000,000
Memphis, Tennessee, Medical Center rail extension project 5,000,000
Miami-Dade Transit east-west multimodal corridor project 3,000,000
Miami-Dade Transit North 27th corridor project 3,000,000
Nashville, Tennessee commuter rail project 1,000,000
New Jersey Hudson Bergen project 99,000,000
New Orleans Canal Street corridor project 2,000,000
Newark rail link MOS 1 project 6,000,000
Norfolk-Virginia Beach corridor project 1,000,000
Northern Indiana south shore commuter rail project 4,000,000
Oceanside-Escondido, California light rail system 2,000,000
Olympic transportation infrastructure investments 5,000,000
Orange County, California, transitway project 1,000,000
Orlando Lynx light rail (phase 1) project 20,000,000
Philadelphia-Reading SEPTA Schuylkill Valley metro project 1,000,000
Phoenix metropolitan area transit project 7,000,000
Pinellas County, Florida, mobility initiative project 3,000,000
Portland Westside light rail transit project 11,062,000
Puget Sound RTA Link light rail project 2,000,000
Puget Sound RTA Sounder commuter rail project 12,000,000
Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill triangle transit project 12,000,000
Sacramento south corridor LRT project 25,000,000
San Bernardino, California, Metrolink project 1,000,000
San Diego Mid Coast corridor project 7,000,000
San Diego Mission Valley East light rail transit project 23,000,000
San Fransciso BART extension to the airport project 84,000,000
San Jose Tasman West light rail project 20,000,000
San Juan Tren Urbano project 82,000,000
South Boston piers transitway 53,962,000
South DeKalb-Lindbergh, Georgia, corridor project 1,000,000
Spokane, Washington, South Valley corridor light rail project 3,000,000
St. Louis, Missouri, MetroLink cross county corridor project 3,000,000
St. Louis-St. Clair County MetroLink light rail (phase II) extension project 50,000,000
Tampa Bay regional rail project 1,000,000
Twin Cities Transitways projects 5,433,000
Twin Cities Transitways projects--Hiawatha corridor project 46,000,000
Utah north/south light rail project 37,928,000
Virginia Railway Express Woodbridge station improvements project 2,000,000
West Trenton, New Jersey, rail project 1,000,000
Whitehall terminal reconstruction project 3,000,000
Atlanta, Georgia north line extension. --The Metropolitan Atlanta
Rapid Transit Authority (MARTA) is constructing a 1.9 mile, 2-station
extension of the North Line from the Dunwoody station to North Springs.
When completed, this extension will serve the rapidly-growing area north
of Atlanta, which includes Perimeter Center and north Fulton County, and
will connect this area with the rest of the region by providing better
transit service for both commuters and inner-city residents traveling to
expanding job opportunities. On December 20, 1994, FTA issued a full
funding grant agreement committing a total of $305,010,000 in new starts
funding to this project. Of this commitment, a total of $249,870,000 has
been appropriated through fiscal year 1999. For fiscal year 2000, the
accompanying bill provides $45,142,000.
Baltimore central light rail double tracking project. --The Maryland
Mass Transit Administration proposes to construct 9.4 miles of track to
upgrade designated areas of the Baltimore central light rail line (CLRL)
that are currently single track. The CLRL is 29 miles long and operates
from Hunt Valley in the north to Cromwell/Glen Burnie in the south,
serving Baltimore City and Baltimore and Anne Arundel Counties, with
extensions providing service to Amtrak at Penn Station and the
Baltimore-Washington International Airport. The proposed project will
double track eight sections of the CLRL between Timonium and Cromwell
Station/Glen Burnie. Although no new stations are required, the addition
of a second track will require construction of second station platforms
at four stations where side boarding platforms are now in use. Other
elements included in the double track project are bridge and crossing
improvements, bi-directional signal system with traffic signal
preemption on Howard Street, and catenary and other equipment and
systems. The double tracking will be constructed almost entirely in
existing right-of-way. The MTA estimates the total cost of these
improvements at $150,000,000. To date, $1,000,000 has been appropriated
to the project. For fiscal year 2000, the Committee recommends
$5,000,000 for final design activities related to this project.
Canton-Akron-Cleveland commuter rail project. --The METRO Regional
Transit Authority (METRO), in cooperation with local metropolitan
planning organizations, regional transit authorities, and the Ohio
Department of Transportation, is conducting a major investment study to
assess the costs and benefits of new passenger rail service,
transportation system management, and/or capacity improvements for the
Canton-Akron-Cleveland corridor. The 70-mile corridor follows a path
along Interstate 77 between Canton and Akron. Between Akron and
Cleveland, the corridor widens to include both I 77 and State Route 8.
The SR 8 alignment utilizes interstate 270 and interstate 480, returning
to I 77 and continues into the central business district of Cleveland.
The corridor frequently experiences traffic congestion and related
safety problems. The study is currently in the primary scoping stage.
The proposed project is included in the Akron metropolitan area
transportation study's long range needs plan. In addition, several miles
of rail right-of-way have been purchased for passenger rail use.
Federal, state and local sources have allocated nearly $15,000,000 to
the project. Through fiscal year 1999, Congress has appropriated
$12,844,142 in section 5309 funds for this effort. The Committee
recommends $4,000,000 in fiscal year 2000.
Charlotte, North Carolina north-south corridor transitway project.
--In Charlotte, North Carolina, the north-south corridor extends
approximately 36.4 miles from Davidson in North Mecklenburg County
through Center City Charlotte to Pineville in southern Mecklenburg. This
corridor was identified in the centers and corridors plan adopted by the
Charlotte Council and Mecklenburg County Board of Commissioners in 1994
and reaffirmed through inclusion in the approved 2015 long range
transportation plan. Several alternatives will be considered, and
include: no-build; transportation systems management; bus rapid transit;
light rail transit; high occupancy vehicle/bus lanes on interstate 77
and widening of I 77. The City of Charlotte, Mecklenburg County and six
other municipalities in the county have developed a countywide
transit/land use plan for 2025. Transit operations and possible land use
actions for the north-south corridor were analyzed. The 2025 plan built
upon earlier transit studies and land use plans for the
Charlotte-Mecklenburg area. The plan was also the basis for obtaining
support for the recently approved county-wide referendum for a 1/2 cent
sales and use tax dedicated to public transportation. The tax, which is
anticipated to yield $50 million during the first year, will provide
local capital and operating funds to support a county-wide public
transportation system. Through fiscal year 1999, Congress has
appropriated nearly $4,000,000 in section 5309 funds for this effort. In
fiscal year 2000, the Committee recommends $3,000,000.
Chicago Metra commuter rail project. --Metra, the commuter rail
division of the Regional Transit Authority (RTA) of northeastern
Illinois, is proposing several extensions: the central Kane corridor,
which would extend trackage west to Elburn, Illinois; the Wisconsin
central limited corridor, which extends from downtown Chicago to Antioch
on the Illinois-Wisconsin border, traversing suburban Lake County; and
the southwest corridor, which would extend commuter rail service from
Orchard Park southwest to Manhattan, Illinois. The accompanying bill
provides $25,000,000 for final design activities for fiscal year 2000.
Chicago Transit Authority Douglas Branch line project. --The Douglas
Branch project is a complete reconstruction of the Douglas Branch of the
Chicago Transit Authority's blue line. The line runs for six miles from
a point just west of downtown Chicago to the terminus of the line at
Cermak Avenue. The Douglas Branch includes 11 stations. CTA has
completed the necessary planning and engineering work. The Douglas
Branch was built between 1912 and 1915. The line currently carries
approximately 27,000 daily riders. Because of its age, the line is
seriously deteriorated and has resulted in high maintenance and
operating costs. The Douglas Branch serves one of the most economically
disadvantaged, distressed areas in Chicago. Total project costs are
currently estimated at $394,000,000. Through fiscal year 1999, Congress
has appropriated $1,490,000 in section 5309 new start funds for the
project. The Committee recommends $2,000,000 in fiscal year 2000.
Chicago Transit Authority Ravenswood Branch line project. --The
Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) is proposing to lengthen existing
platforms and expand stations on the existing CTA Brown Line to
accommodate 8 car trains. The Brown Line runs for 9.2 miles from the
north side of Chicago to the Loop elevated in downtown Chicago and
includes 19 stations. Most of the line is operated on elevated structure
except for a portion near the northern end of the line, which operates
at grade. The Brown Line was built between 1900 and 1907. The Line
currently carries approximately 104,000 daily riders. Ridership has been
steadily increasing and current station and platform size prohibits CTA
from increasing capacity of the line to handle increased demand.
Selected yard improvements would also be undertaken. CTA has completed
the necessary planning and engineering work. Total project costs are
currently estimated at $310,000,000. Through fiscal year 1999,
$1,490,000 in section 5309 new starts funds for this project. The
Committee recommends $2,000,000 for final design and construction during
fiscal year 2000.
Cincinnati northeast/northern Kentucky corridor project. --The
Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana (OKI) Regional Council of Governments is proposing
to design and construct a 43-mile light rail transit line in a corridor
extending north from the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International
Airport and Florence, Kentucky to the city of Mason, Ohio. The proposed
alignment will use an existing right-of-way and active right-of-way
along a portion of the Indiana and Ohio railroad, owned by the Southwest
Ohio Regional Transit Authority. OKI has initiated preliminary
engineering and the preparation of a draft environment impact statement
for the first minimum operable segment (MOS 1) extending approximately
16.5 miles. The MOS 1 begins at 12th Street in Covington, Kentucky and
terminates at Pfieffer Road in Blue Ash, Ohio. The MOS 1 includes a
proposed 18 stations. Capital cost estimates for MOS 1 total $675.8
million. OKI estimates that 19,821 average weekday riders will use the
MOS 1 in the year 2020. The total capital cost estimate for the entire
43-mile LRT, including 30 proposed stations, for the I 71 corridor, is
$1,157,000,000. Through fiscal year 1999, Congress has appropriated
$8,780,000. For fiscal year 2000, the bill includes $2,000,000.
Clark County, Nevada fixed guideway project.-- The Regional
Transportation Commission (RTC) of Clark County (Las Vegas), Nevada, is
the designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) and regional
governmental entity responsible for providing public transportation
within Clark County. In the Fall of 1997, RTC selected a locally
preferred alternative for the Las Vegas resort corridor which includes a
combination of fixed guideway transit, significant expansion of the bus
fleet, implementation of TSM/TDM strategies, and some roadway
improvements. The core system includes a dual direction, elevated fixed
guideway rail system along Las Vegas Boulevard with a link to downtown
Las Vegas, an interim maintenance and control facility, and the
acquisition of 30 vehicles. The resort corridor project will be
completed in two phases, with a Phase 1 minimum operable segment (MOS),
located in the northernmost portion of the system. The MOS consists of
5.2 miles of double track, all elevated, with an automated guideway and
ten stations. A major facility at the northern terminus will include a
guideway station, a 28- to 30-by bus terminal, a 2,000 vehicle park and
ride lot, and a maintenance and operating facility. The MOS is estimated
to cost $500.3 million, and serve 93,000 daily riders in the year 2020.
The full build-out of the complete project includes up to 18.4 miles of
elevated double-track, with an automated guideway and 27 stations
extending to the McCarren International Airport, and is estimated to
cost $2,180,000,000. Through fiscal year 1999, Congress has appropriated
$8,954,000 for the project. The accompanying bill includes $2,000,000
for the project in fiscal year 2000.
Cleveland Euclid corridor improvement project. --The Greater
Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (GCRTA), in partnership with the
City of Cleveland, is proposing to design and construct a 5.6 mile
transit corridor incorporating exclusive bus rapid transit lanes and
related capital improvements on Euclid Avenue from Public Square in
downtown Cleveland, east to University Circle. The proposed project is
known as the Euclid Corridor improvement project (ECIP). GCRTA also
proposes that three stations along the existing Red Line be relocated
and three stations be renovated in order to spur economic development
and improve access between the stations, surrounding neighborhoods, and
employment centers. The total capital cost estimate for the ECIP is
$327,000,000. Through fiscal year 1999, Congress has appropriated
$8,500,000. For fiscal year 2000, the Committee recommends $1,000,000.
Colorado Roaring Fork Valley project. --In 1995, the Colorado
Department of Transportation (CDOT) completed a feasibility study of
rail transit in the 40-mile Aspen to Glenwood Springs Corridor in the
Roaring Fork Valley, about 160 miles west of Denver. The study estimated
that a valley-wide rail system would cost approximately $129,000,000. As
a result, the City of Aspen is considering a locally-funded light rail
transit (LRT) line in a four-mile segment of the corridor connecting
Pitkin County Airport with downtown Aspen. This segment is dependent on
the outcome of a local ballot initiative that is expected in November
1999. CDOT, meanwhile, is conducting a major investment study/draft
environmental impact statement (MIS/DEIS) to analyze transportation
alternatives, alignments, and costs in the remainder of the valley, the
35-mile corridor to Glenwood Springs. The MIS/DEIS is scheduled for
completion in June 1999. Through fiscal year 1999, Congress has
appropriated $1,993,000,000 in section 5309 new starts funds for this
effort. The Committee recommends $1,000,000 for this project in fiscal
year 2000.
Dallas north central light rail project. --Dallas Area Rapid Transit
(DART) plans to build an extension of its existing light rail system,
which opened in phases from June 1996 to May 1997, north to the City of
Plano. The 12.5-mile extension would connect with the existing system at
the Park Lane Station, adding nine new stations. DART estimates that
approximately 17,000 riders will use this extension by 2020. The total
cost of this project is estimated at $517,200,000. This extension is
nearing completion of the final design phase of project development. It
is included in the regionally adopted metropolitan transportation plan
and transportation improvement program, which are in conformance with
the state implementation plan for air quality. DART began contracting
for construction and purchasing vehicles and necessary right-of-way in
May 1998. The North Central Extension is authorized for final design and
construction by section 3030(a)(20) of TEA21. A total of $43,200,000 in
section 5309 new starts funds has been appropriated for this project
through fiscal year 1999. For fiscal year 2000, the Committee has
included an appropriation of $35,000,000 for final design and
construction.
Dayton, Ohio light rail study.-- The Committee recommendation
includes an appropriation of $993,000 for a light rail feasibility study
in Dayton, Ohio. The Congress has previously provided $1,000,000 for
this project.
Denver southwest corridor project. --The Regional Transit District
(RTD) in Denver is constructing an 8.7-mile light rail extension between
Denver and Littleton. The line extends from the I 25/Broadway station on
the existing Central Corridor line south to Mineral Avenue in Littleton,
running parallel to Santa Fe Drive over an exclusive, grade-separated
right-of-way. This extension is expected to serve 8,400 daily passengers
when it opens for revenue service in July 2000, with an estimated 22,000
daily riders by 2015. FTA issued an FFGA for this project on May 9,
1996, which will provide a total of $120,000,000 in section 5309 new
starts funding. Through fiscal year 1998, a total of $25.76 million has
been provided to this project, with an additional $39.70 million
appropriated in fiscal year 1999. For fiscal year 2000, the Committee
recommends $35,000,000.
Dulles corridor project. --In June 1997, the Virginia Department of
Rail and Public Transportation (VDRPT) completed a major investment
study which evaluated several transportation options in the Dulles
Corridor. The corridor extends from the West Falls Church Metrorail
Station to Dulles International Airport and continues into Loudon
County. The study recommended that a 23-mile, $1.45 billion rail system
be constructed to alleviate congestion and facilitate future growth in
the corridor. The study also called for the development of a funding
plan and the implementation of enhanced bus service. In July 1998, the
Virginia Secretary of Transportation assembled the Dulles Task Force to
determine the steps necessary for phased implementation of rail service
along the Dulles Corridor. This includes a bus rapid transit (BRT)
system that will operate similar to a rail system with stations built in
the median and access provided through pedestrian overpasses. These
stations will be designed for conversion into rail stations during the
next phase of the project. Through fiscal year 1999, Congress has
appropriated $16,870,000 in section 5309 new starts funds for this
effort. The accompanying bill provides $25,000,000 in fiscal year 2000
to be available for final design activities.
Fort Lauderdale, Florida Tri-county commuter rail project. --The
Tri-County Commuter Rail Authority (Tri-Rail) is proposing a number of
system improvements to the 71.7-mile regional transportation system it
operates within Palm Beach, Broward and Dade Counties in South Florida.
This area has a population of over four million, nearly one-third of the
total population of Florida. The planned improvements include
construction of a second mainline track, rehabilitation of the signal
system, station and parking improvements, acquisition of new rolling
stock, improvements to the Hialeah maintenance yard facility and
construction of a new, northern layover facility. The proposed
double-tracking is intended to allow for 15 minute headways during peak
commuter hours, as opposed to the current one-hour headways. Tri-Rail
estimates that these improvements will serve an average of 68,348 daily
riders by 2015. To date, 9.6 miles of the double track corridor
improvement project have been completed, including a station at Miami
International Airport, which will be the cornerstone of |